Hyster P2.0 vs Linde X20/600

Key differences

  • Maximum Lift Height. The Linde X20/600 offers 2,965 mm more maximum lift height than the Hyster P2.0.
  • Overall Width. The Hyster P2.0 offers 544 mm less overall width than the Linde X20/600.
  • Outside Turning Radius. The Hyster P2.0 offers 745 mm less outside turning radius than the Linde X20/600.
  • Operating Weight. These differ: Hyster P2.0 632 kg, Linde X20/600 4,837 kg.
  • Lift Motor Power. The Linde X20/600 offers 18.8 kW more lift motor power than the Hyster P2.0.
  • Lift Speed (laden). The Linde X20/600 offers 520 mm/s more lift speed (laden) than the Hyster P2.0.

On maximum lift height, Linde X20/600 leads with the higher figure at 3,095 mm versus 130 mm for Hyster P2.0. The measured gap is 2,965 mm, or 2,280.8% relative to the latter published value.

Linde X20/600 leads with the higher figure on travel speed (laden): its published 22.0 km/h compares with 6.0 km/h for Hyster P2.0. That is an absolute difference of 16.0 km/h (266.7% against the latter figure).

The lift speed (laden) figures separate Linde X20/600 and Hyster P2.0. Linde X20/600 leads with the higher figure with 560 mm/s; Hyster P2.0 records 40 mm/s, a gap of 520 mm/s or 1,300.0% of that second value.

On operating weight, Linde X20/600 has the higher published figure at 4,837 kg versus 632 kg for Hyster P2.0. The measured gap is 4,205 kg, or 665.3% relative to the latter published value.

Hyster P2.0 leads with the lower figure on outside turning radius: its published 1,607 mm compares with 2,352 mm for Linde X20/600. That is an absolute difference of 745 mm (31.7% against the latter figure).

The battery capacity figures separate Linde X20/600 and Hyster P2.0. Linde X20/600 leads with the higher figure with 670 Ah; Hyster P2.0 records 375 Ah, a gap of 295 Ah or 78.7% of that second value.

Highlighted values lead on that specification. An arrow indicates whether a higher or lower figure is preferred.

Specification Hyster P2.0 Linde X20/600
Capacity & Load
Rated Lift Capacity 2,000 kg (4,409 lb) (at 600 mm load centre) 2,000 kg (4,409 lb) (at 600 mm load centre)
Load Centre 600 mm (23.6 in) 600 mm (23.6 in)
Maximum Lift Height 130 mm (5.1 in) 3,095 mm (10.2 ft)
Free Lift Not specified 150 mm (5.9 in)
Mast & Forks
Mast Type Not specified Standard mast
Mast Height Lowered Not specified 2,220 mm (7.3 ft)
Mast Height Extended Not specified 3,852 mm (12.6 ft)
Mast Tilt Forward Not specified 5deg
Mast Tilt Backward Not specified 8deg
Fork Length 1,156 mm (45.5 in) 1,000 mm (39.4 in)
Fork Width 172 mm (6.8 in) 100 mm (3.9 in)
Fork Thickness 64 mm (2.5 in) 45 mm (1.8 in)
Fork Carriage Class Not specified 2A
Engine & Powertrain
Fuel Type Electric Electric
Power Source Electric (battery) Battery Electric
Engine / Motor Power Not specified 24.8 kW (33.3 hp)
Drive Motor Power 1.3 kW (1.7 hp) 12.4 kW (16.6 hp)
Lift Motor Power 1.2 kW (1.6 hp) 20.0 kW (26.8 hp)
Transmission Not specified Synchronous reluctance motors, stepless digital control
Battery & Fuel
Battery Voltage 24 V 90 V
Battery Capacity 375 Ah 670 Ah
Battery Energy Not specified 60.3 kWh
Battery Type Lead-acid Lithium-ion
Minimum Battery Weight 288 kg (635 lb) Not specified
Dimensions
Overall Length (with forks) 1,806 mm (71.1 in) 3,671 mm (12.0 ft)
Length to Fork Face 650 mm (25.6 in) 2,671 mm (8.8 ft)
Overall Width 712 mm (28.0 in) 1,256 mm (49.4 in)
Height to Overhead Guard Not specified 2,225 mm (7.3 ft)
Wheelbase 1,440 mm (56.7 in) 1,835 mm (72.2 in)
Ground Clearance 21 mm (0.8 in) 173 mm (6.8 in)
Outside Turning Radius 1,607 mm (63.3 in) 2,352 mm (7.7 ft)
Right-Angle Stacking Aisle (incl. load) 2,409 mm (7.9 ft) 4,008 mm (13.1 ft)
Working Aisle (VDI 4.34), 1000x1200 Crossways 2,409 mm (7.9 ft) 4,008 mm (13.1 ft)
Working Aisle (VDI 4.34), 800x1200 Lengthwise 2,276 mm (7.5 ft) 4,208 mm (13.8 ft)
Load Distance (x) 955 mm (37.6 in) 455 mm (17.9 in)
Internal Turning Radius (b13) Not specified 655 mm (25.8 in)
Weights
Operating Weight 632 kg (1,393 lb) 4,837 kg (10,664 lb)
Front Axle Load (laden) 983 kg (2,167 lb) 5,663 kg (12,485 lb)
Rear Axle Load (laden) 1,649 kg (3,635 lb) 1,174 kg (2,588 lb)
Performance
Travel Speed (laden) 6.0 km/h (3.7 mph) 22.0 km/h (13.7 mph)
Travel Speed (unladen) 6.0 km/h (3.7 mph) 22.0 km/h (13.7 mph)
Lift Speed (laden) 40 mm/s (7.9 ft/min) 560 mm/s (110.2 ft/min)
Lift Speed (unladen) 50 mm/s (9.8 ft/min) 580 mm/s (114.2 ft/min)
Lowering Speed (laden) 90 mm/s (17.7 ft/min) 580 mm/s (114.2 ft/min)
Gradeability (laden) 4.5% 22.2%
Drawbar Pull (laden) Not specified 7,600 N (1,709 lbf)
Tyres, Brakes & Chassis
Tyre Type Polyurethane Solid Pneumatic
Front Tyre Size 250 x 75 250/75-12 (27 x 10-12)
Rear Tyre Size 85 x 110 6.50-10
Wheels (front / rear) 1x+2 / 2 2x / 2
Service Brake Electromagnetic Hydraulic / mechanical
Operator Position Pedestrian Seated
General
Warranty 24 months / 4,000 hours (manufacturer standard) Not specified

What the numbers say

This is a cross-brand comparison: Hyster P2.0 (P Series (A418)), Linde X20/600 (X Series 1252).

Hyster P2.0: 2,000 kg (at 600 mm load centre); Linde X20/600: 2,000 kg (at 600 mm load centre). These are published ratings at the same load centre. Check the manufacturer's load chart for the exact mast, lift height and attachment configuration before selecting a truck.

The Hyster P2.0 and Linde X20/600 are rated at 2,000 kg, so capacity does not separate them.

For racking, the Linde X20/600 reaches 3,095 mm while the Hyster P2.0 tops out at 130 mm, a difference of 2,965 mm.

Per tonne of rated capacity the Hyster P2.0 weighs 316 kg and the Linde X20/600 weighs 2,419 kg.

Running cost

Frequently asked questions

How do the lift heights of the Hyster P2.0 and Linde X20/600 compare?

Hyster P2.0: 130 mm. Linde X20/600: 3,095 mm.

How do the turning radii of the Hyster P2.0 and Linde X20/600 compare?

Hyster P2.0: 1,607 mm. Linde X20/600: 2,352 mm.

How do the operating weights of the Hyster P2.0 and Linde X20/600 compare?

Hyster P2.0: 632 kg. Linde X20/600: 4,837 kg.

What is the main difference between the Hyster P2.0 and Linde X20/600?

The Linde X20/600 offers 2,965 mm more maximum lift height than the Hyster P2.0. The Hyster P2.0 offers 544 mm less overall width than the Linde X20/600. The Hyster P2.0 offers 745 mm less outside turning radius than the Linde X20/600.

People also compare

Other machines in this class

Toyota

8FBC20U

  • Capacity1,810 kg
  • Lift height3,340 mm
  • FuelElectric

72%

Toyota

8FBC20U-COMP

  • Capacity1,810 kg
  • Lift height3,340 mm
  • FuelElectric

72%

Toyota

8FBC18U

  • Capacity1,750 kg
  • Lift height3,335 mm
  • FuelElectric

79%

Toyota

8FBC25U

  • Capacity2,270 kg
  • Lift height3,340 mm
  • FuelElectric

72%

Toyota

8FBC25U-COMP

  • Capacity2,270 kg
  • Lift height3,340 mm
  • FuelElectric

72%

Hyster

J2.2A

  • Capacity2,000 kg
  • Lift height3,371 mm
  • FuelElectric

86%

Compare something else

Start a new comparison