Linde X20/600 vs Toyota 8FBCH25U
Key differences
- Engine / Motor Power. The Linde X20/600 offers 10.0 kW more engine / motor power than the Toyota 8FBCH25U.
- Outside Turning Radius. The Toyota 8FBCH25U offers 412 mm less outside turning radius than the Linde X20/600.
- Overall Width. The Toyota 8FBCH25U offers 191 mm less overall width than the Linde X20/600.
- Rated Lift Capacity. The Toyota 8FBCH25U offers 270 kg more rated lift capacity than the Linde X20/600. Linde X20/600: 2,000 kg (at 600 mm load centre) · Toyota 8FBCH25U: 2,270 kg (at 600 mm load centre). These are published ratings at the same load centre. Check the manufacturer's load chart for the exact mast, lift height and attachment configuration before selecting a truck.
- Maximum Lift Height. The Toyota 8FBCH25U offers 245 mm more maximum lift height than the Linde X20/600.
- Ground Clearance. The Linde X20/600 offers 73 mm more ground clearance than the Toyota 8FBCH25U.
On rated lift capacity, Toyota 8FBCH25U leads with the higher figure at 2,270 kg versus 2,000 kg for Linde X20/600. The measured gap is 270 kg, or 13.5% relative to the latter published value. Linde X20/600: 2,000 kg (at 600 mm load centre) · Toyota 8FBCH25U: 2,270 kg (at 600 mm load centre). These are published ratings at the same load centre. Check the manufacturer's load chart for the exact mast, lift height and attachment configuration before selecting a truck.
Toyota 8FBCH25U leads with the higher figure on maximum lift height: its published 3,340 mm compares with 3,095 mm for Linde X20/600. That is an absolute difference of 245 mm (7.9% against the latter figure).
The travel speed (laden) figures separate Linde X20/600 and Toyota 8FBCH25U. Linde X20/600 leads with the higher figure with 22.0 km/h; Toyota 8FBCH25U records 19.5 km/h, a gap of 2.5 km/h or 12.8% of that second value.
On lift speed (laden), Linde X20/600 leads with the higher figure at 560 mm/s versus 520 mm/s for Toyota 8FBCH25U. The measured gap is 40 mm/s, or 7.7% relative to the latter published value.
Toyota 8FBCH25U leads with the lower figure on outside turning radius: its published 1,940 mm compares with 2,352 mm for Linde X20/600. That is an absolute difference of 412 mm (17.5% against the latter figure).
The battery capacity figures separate Toyota 8FBCH25U and Linde X20/600. Toyota 8FBCH25U leads with the higher figure with 850 Ah; Linde X20/600 records 670 Ah, a gap of 180 Ah or 26.9% of that second value.
Highlighted values lead on that specification. An arrow indicates whether a higher or lower figure is preferred.
| Specification | Linde X20/600 | Toyota 8FBCH25U |
|---|---|---|
| Capacity & Load | ||
| Rated Lift Capacity | 2,000 kg (4,409 lb) (at 600 mm load centre) | 2,270 kg (5,004 lb) (at 600 mm load centre) |
| Load Centre | 600 mm (23.6 in) | 600 mm (23.6 in) |
| Maximum Lift Height | 3,095 mm (10.2 ft) | 3,340 mm (11.0 ft) |
| Free Lift | 150 mm (5.9 in) | 155 mm (6.1 in) |
| Mast & Forks | ||
| Mast Type | Standard mast | Wide-view 2-stage (V) |
| Mast Height Lowered | 2,220 mm (7.3 ft) | 2,110 mm (6.9 ft) |
| Mast Height Extended | 3,852 mm (12.6 ft) | 4,560 mm (15.0 ft) |
| Mast Tilt Forward | 5deg | 6deg |
| Mast Tilt Backward | 8deg | 8deg |
| Fork Length | 1,000 mm (39.4 in) | 1,070 mm (42.1 in) |
| Fork Width | 100 mm (3.9 in) | 125 mm (4.9 in) |
| Fork Thickness | 45 mm (1.8 in) | 40 mm (1.6 in) |
| Fork Carriage Class | 2A | Not specified |
| Engine & Powertrain | ||
| Fuel Type | Electric | Electric |
| Power Source | Battery Electric | Battery Electric |
| Engine / Motor Power | 24.8 kW (33.3 hp) | 14.8 kW (19.8 hp) |
| Drive Motor Power | 12.4 kW (16.6 hp) | 14.8 kW (19.8 hp) |
| Lift Motor Power | 20.0 kW (26.8 hp) | 21.5 kW (28.8 hp) |
| Transmission | Synchronous reluctance motors, stepless digital control | AC drive, transistor inverter |
| Battery & Fuel | ||
| Battery Voltage | 90 V | 48 V |
| Battery Capacity | 670 Ah | 850 Ah |
| Battery Energy | 60.3 kWh | Not specified |
| Battery Type | Lithium-ion | Lead-acid |
| Dimensions | ||
| Overall Length (with forks) | 3,671 mm (12.0 ft) | Not specified |
| Length to Fork Face | 2,671 mm (8.8 ft) | 2,170 mm (7.1 ft) |
| Overall Width | 1,256 mm (49.4 in) | 1,065 mm (41.9 in) |
| Height to Overhead Guard | 2,225 mm (7.3 ft) | 2,235 mm (7.3 ft) |
| Wheelbase | 1,835 mm (72.2 in) | 1,390 mm (54.7 in) |
| Ground Clearance | 173 mm (6.8 in) | 100 mm (3.9 in) |
| Outside Turning Radius | 2,352 mm (7.7 ft) | 1,940 mm (76.4 in) |
| Right-Angle Stacking Aisle (incl. load) | 4,008 mm (13.1 ft) | Not specified |
| Right-Angle Stacking Aisle (excl. load) | Not specified | 2,365 mm (7.8 ft) |
| Working Aisle (VDI 4.34), 1000x1200 Crossways | 4,008 mm (13.1 ft) | Not specified |
| Working Aisle (VDI 4.34), 800x1200 Lengthwise | 4,208 mm (13.8 ft) | Not specified |
| Load Distance (x) | 455 mm (17.9 in) | 425 mm (16.7 in) |
| Internal Turning Radius (b13) | 655 mm (25.8 in) | Not specified |
| Weights | ||
| Operating Weight | 4,837 kg (10,664 lb) | Not specified |
| Front Axle Load (laden) | 5,663 kg (12,485 lb) | Not specified |
| Rear Axle Load (laden) | 1,174 kg (2,588 lb) | Not specified |
| Performance | ||
| Travel Speed (laden) | 22.0 km/h (13.7 mph) | 19.5 km/h (12.1 mph) |
| Travel Speed (unladen) | 22.0 km/h (13.7 mph) | 19.0 km/h (11.8 mph) |
| Lift Speed (laden) | 560 mm/s (110.2 ft/min) | 520 mm/s (102.4 ft/min) |
| Lift Speed (unladen) | 580 mm/s (114.2 ft/min) | 660 mm/s (129.9 ft/min) |
| Lowering Speed (laden) | 580 mm/s (114.2 ft/min) | 500 mm/s (98.4 ft/min) |
| Gradeability (laden) | 22.2% | 21.0% |
| Drawbar Pull (laden) | 7,600 N (1,709 lbf) | Not specified |
| Tyres, Brakes & Chassis | ||
| Tyre Type | Solid Pneumatic | Cushion |
| Front Tyre Size | 250/75-12 (27 x 10-12) | 21 x 7 x 15 |
| Rear Tyre Size | 6.50-10 | 16 x 5 x 10.5 |
| Wheels (front / rear) | 2x / 2 | 2x / 2 |
| Service Brake | Hydraulic / mechanical | Hydraulic |
| Operator Position | Seated | Seated |
What the numbers say
This is a cross-brand comparison: Linde X20/600 (X Series 1252), Toyota 8FBCH25U (Core Electric 8FBC).
Linde X20/600: 2,000 kg (at 600 mm load centre); Toyota 8FBCH25U: 2,270 kg (at 600 mm load centre). These are published ratings at the same load centre. Check the manufacturer's load chart for the exact mast, lift height and attachment configuration before selecting a truck.
The Toyota 8FBCH25U has the highest published rating at 2,270 kg, 14% more than the Linde X20/600 at 2,000 kg.
For racking, the Toyota 8FBCH25U reaches 3,340 mm while the Linde X20/600 tops out at 3,095 mm, a difference of 245 mm.
By rated capacity among the electric forklifts in this database (highest first): Linde X20/600 14th of 19, Toyota 8FBCH25U 11th of 19.
Frequently asked questions
How do the published lift capacity ratings of the Linde X20/600 and Toyota 8FBCH25U compare?
Linde X20/600: 2,000 kg (at 600 mm load centre). Toyota 8FBCH25U: 2,270 kg (at 600 mm load centre). These are published ratings at the same load centre. Check the manufacturer's load chart for the exact mast, lift height and attachment configuration before selecting a truck.
How do the lift heights of the Linde X20/600 and Toyota 8FBCH25U compare?
Linde X20/600: 3,095 mm. Toyota 8FBCH25U: 3,340 mm.
How do the turning radii of the Linde X20/600 and Toyota 8FBCH25U compare?
Linde X20/600: 2,352 mm. Toyota 8FBCH25U: 1,940 mm.
What is the main difference between the Linde X20/600 and Toyota 8FBCH25U?
The Linde X20/600 offers 10.0 kW more engine / motor power than the Toyota 8FBCH25U. The Toyota 8FBCH25U offers 412 mm less outside turning radius than the Linde X20/600. The Toyota 8FBCH25U offers 191 mm less overall width than the Linde X20/600.