Linde X20/600 vs Toyota 8FBC25U-COMP
Comparing 2 electric forklifts on published specifications. 28 specifications are published for every model here.
Key differences
- Engine / Motor Power. Linde X20/600 offers 10.0 kW more engine / motor power than the next model in this comparison.
- Outside Turning Radius. Toyota 8FBC25U-COMP offers 602 mm less outside turning radius than the next model in this comparison.
- Overall Width. Toyota 8FBC25U-COMP offers 191 mm less overall width than the next model in this comparison.
- Rated Lift Capacity. Toyota 8FBC25U-COMP offers 270 kg more rated lift capacity than the next model in this comparison.
- Maximum Lift Height. Toyota 8FBC25U-COMP offers 245 mm more maximum lift height than the next model in this comparison.
- Ground Clearance. Linde X20/600 offers 73 mm more ground clearance than the next model in this comparison.
| Specification | Linde X20/600 | Toyota 8FBC25U-COMP |
|---|---|---|
| Capacity & Load | ||
| Rated Lift Capacity ↑ | 2,000 kg (4,409 lb) | 2,270 kg (5,004 lb) (leads on this specification) |
| Load Centre | 600 mm (23.6 in) | 600 mm (23.6 in) |
| Maximum Lift Height ↑ | 3,095 mm (10.2 ft) | 3,340 mm (11.0 ft) (leads on this specification) |
| Free Lift ↑ | 150 mm (5.9 in) | 155 mm (6.1 in) |
| Mast & Forks | ||
| Mast Type | Standard mast | Wide-view 2-stage (V) |
| Mast Height Lowered ↓ | 2,220 mm (7.3 ft) | 2,115 mm (6.9 ft) |
| Mast Height Extended | 3,852 mm (12.6 ft) | 4,560 mm (15.0 ft) |
| Mast Tilt Forward | 5deg | 6deg |
| Mast Tilt Backward | 8deg | 8deg |
| Fork Length | 1,000 mm (39.4 in) | 1,070 mm (42.1 in) |
| Fork Width | 100 mm (3.9 in) | 125 mm (4.9 in) |
| Fork Thickness | 45 mm (1.8 in) | 40 mm (1.6 in) |
| Fork Carriage Class | 2A | Not specified |
| Engine & Powertrain | ||
| Fuel Type | Electric | Electric |
| Power Source | Battery Electric | Battery Electric |
| Engine / Motor Power ↑ | 24.8 kW (33.3 hp) (leads on this specification) | 14.8 kW (19.8 hp) |
| Drive Motor Power ↑ | 12.4 kW (16.6 hp) | 14.8 kW (19.8 hp) (leads on this specification) |
| Lift Motor Power ↑ | 20.0 kW (26.8 hp) | 21.5 kW (28.8 hp) (leads on this specification) |
| Transmission | Synchronous reluctance motors, stepless digital control | AC drive, transistor inverter |
| Battery & Fuel | ||
| Battery Voltage | 90 V | 48 V |
| Battery Capacity ↑ | 670 Ah | 680 Ah |
| Battery Energy ↑ | 60.3 kWh | Not specified |
| Battery Type | Lithium-ion | Lead-acid |
| Dimensions | ||
| Overall Length (with forks) ↓ | 3,671 mm (12.0 ft) | Not specified |
| Length to Fork Face ↓ | 2,671 mm (8.8 ft) | 2,100 mm (6.9 ft) (leads on this specification) |
| Overall Width ↓ | 1,256 mm (49.4 in) | 1,065 mm (41.9 in) (leads on this specification) |
| Height to Overhead Guard ↓ | 2,225 mm (7.3 ft) | 2,235 mm (7.3 ft) |
| Wheelbase | 1,835 mm (72.2 in) | 1,295 mm (51.0 in) |
| Ground Clearance ↑ | 173 mm (6.8 in) (leads on this specification) | 100 mm (3.9 in) |
| Outside Turning Radius ↓ | 2,352 mm (7.7 ft) | 1,750 mm (68.9 in) (leads on this specification) |
| Right-Angle Stacking Aisle (incl. load) ↓ | 4,008 mm (13.1 ft) | Not specified |
| Right-Angle Stacking Aisle (excl. load) ↓ | Not specified | 2,170 mm (7.1 ft) |
| Weights | ||
| Operating Weight | 4,837 kg (10,664 lb) | Not specified |
| Front Axle Load (laden) | 5,663 kg (12,485 lb) | Not specified |
| Rear Axle Load (laden) | 1,174 kg (2,588 lb) | Not specified |
| Performance | ||
| Travel Speed (laden) ↑ | 22.0 km/h (13.7 mph) (leads on this specification) | 19.5 km/h (12.1 mph) |
| Travel Speed (unladen) ↑ | 22.0 km/h (13.7 mph) (leads on this specification) | 19.0 km/h (11.8 mph) |
| Lift Speed (laden) ↑ | 560 mm/s (110.2 ft/min) (leads on this specification) | 520 mm/s (102.4 ft/min) |
| Lift Speed (unladen) ↑ | 580 mm/s (114.2 ft/min) | 660 mm/s (129.9 ft/min) (leads on this specification) |
| Lowering Speed (laden) | 580 mm/s (114.2 ft/min) | 500 mm/s (98.4 ft/min) |
| Gradeability (laden) ↑ | 22.2% (leads on this specification) | 21.0% |
| Drawbar Pull (laden) ↑ | 7,600 N (1,709 lbf) | Not specified |
| Tyres, Brakes & Chassis | ||
| Tyre Type | Solid Pneumatic | Cushion |
| Front Tyre Size | 250/75-12 (27 x 10-12) | 21 x 7 x 15 |
| Rear Tyre Size | 6.50-10 | 16 x 5 x 10.5 |
| Wheels (front / rear) | 2x / 2 | 2x / 2 |
| Service Brake | Hydraulic / mechanical | Hydraulic |
| Operator Position | Seated | Seated |
How to read this comparison
- A highlighted value means that model leads on that specification, and only where a higher or lower figure is objectively better. Capacity and lift height are marked; wheelbase and tyre size are not, because neither direction is universally better.
- A value is only marked when every model in the comparison published that figure. We never mark a leader against missing data.
- We do not name an overall winner. Which machine is right depends on your aisles, your shift pattern and your energy prices, which no specification table knows.
- Capacity figures are only comparable at the same load centre. Check the load centre row before comparing capacities directly.
Frequently asked questions
Which has the higher lift capacity, the Linde X20/600 and Toyota 8FBC25U-COMP?
Linde X20/600: 2,000 kg. Toyota 8FBC25U-COMP: 2,270 kg.
What is the main difference between the Linde X20/600 and Toyota 8FBC25U-COMP?
Linde X20/600 offers 10.0 kW more engine / motor power than the next model in this comparison. Toyota 8FBC25U-COMP offers 602 mm less outside turning radius than the next model in this comparison. Toyota 8FBC25U-COMP offers 191 mm less overall width than the next model in this comparison.
People also compare
Other machines in this class
Compare something else
Build your own comparison with up to four models.
Start a new comparison