Linde X20/600 vs Toyota 50-8FGU20
Key differences
- Engine / Motor Power. The Toyota 50-8FGU20 offers 13.2 kW more engine / motor power than the Linde X20/600.
- Rated Lift Capacity. The Linde X20/600 offers 200 kg more rated lift capacity than the Toyota 50-8FGU20. Linde X20/600: 2,000 kg (at 600 mm load centre) · Toyota 50-8FGU20: 1,800 kg (at 600 mm load centre). These are published ratings at the same load centre. Check the manufacturer's load chart for the exact mast, lift height and attachment configuration before selecting a truck.
- Outside Turning Radius. The Toyota 50-8FGU20 offers 202 mm less outside turning radius than the Linde X20/600.
- Overall Width. The Toyota 50-8FGU20 offers 106 mm less overall width than the Linde X20/600.
- Maximum Lift Height. The Toyota 50-8FGU20 offers 245 mm more maximum lift height than the Linde X20/600.
- Operating Weight. These differ: Linde X20/600 4,837 kg, Toyota 50-8FGU20 3,210 kg.
On rated lift capacity, Linde X20/600 leads with the higher figure at 2,000 kg versus 1,800 kg for Toyota 50-8FGU20. The measured gap is 200 kg, or 11.1% relative to the latter published value. Linde X20/600: 2,000 kg (at 600 mm load centre) · Toyota 50-8FGU20: 1,800 kg (at 600 mm load centre). These are published ratings at the same load centre. Check the manufacturer's load chart for the exact mast, lift height and attachment configuration before selecting a truck.
Toyota 50-8FGU20 leads with the higher figure on maximum lift height: its published 3,340 mm compares with 3,095 mm for Linde X20/600. That is an absolute difference of 245 mm (7.9% against the latter figure).
The travel speed (laden) figures separate Linde X20/600 and Toyota 50-8FGU20. Linde X20/600 leads with the higher figure with 22.0 km/h; Toyota 50-8FGU20 records 17.5 km/h, a gap of 4.5 km/h or 25.7% of that second value.
On lift speed (laden), Toyota 50-8FGU20 leads with the higher figure at 600 mm/s versus 560 mm/s for Linde X20/600. The measured gap is 40 mm/s, or 7.1% relative to the latter published value.
Linde X20/600 has the higher published figure on operating weight: its published 4,837 kg compares with 3,210 kg for Toyota 50-8FGU20. That is an absolute difference of 1,627 kg (50.7% against the latter figure).
The outside turning radius figures separate Toyota 50-8FGU20 and Linde X20/600. Toyota 50-8FGU20 leads with the lower figure with 2,150 mm; Linde X20/600 records 2,352 mm, a gap of 202 mm or 8.6% of that second value.
Highlighted values lead on that specification. An arrow indicates whether a higher or lower figure is preferred.
| Specification | Linde X20/600 | Toyota 50-8FGU20 |
|---|---|---|
| Capacity & Load | ||
| Rated Lift Capacity | 2,000 kg (4,409 lb) (at 600 mm load centre) | 1,800 kg (3,968 lb) (at 600 mm load centre) |
| Load Centre | 600 mm (23.6 in) | 600 mm (23.6 in) |
| Maximum Lift Height | 3,095 mm (10.2 ft) | 3,340 mm (11.0 ft) |
| Free Lift | 150 mm (5.9 in) | 155 mm (6.1 in) |
| Mast & Forks | ||
| Mast Type | Standard mast | Wide-view 2-stage (V) |
| Mast Height Lowered | 2,220 mm (7.3 ft) | 2,145 mm (7.0 ft) |
| Mast Height Extended | 3,852 mm (12.6 ft) | 4,560 mm (15.0 ft) |
| Mast Tilt Forward | 5deg | 6deg |
| Mast Tilt Backward | 8deg | 11deg |
| Fork Length | 1,000 mm (39.4 in) | 1,070 mm (42.1 in) |
| Fork Width | 100 mm (3.9 in) | 125 mm (4.9 in) |
| Fork Thickness | 45 mm (1.8 in) | 40 mm (1.6 in) |
| Fork Carriage Class | 2A | Not specified |
| Engine & Powertrain | ||
| Fuel Type | Electric | LPG |
| Power Source | Battery Electric | Internal Combustion |
| Engine Manufacturer | Not specified | Toyota |
| Engine Model | Not specified | 4Y-US (2.2 L) |
| Engine / Motor Power | 24.8 kW (33.3 hp) | 38.0 kW (51.0 hp) |
| Engine Displacement | Not specified | 2,237 cc |
| Cylinders | Not specified | 4 |
| Drive Motor Power | 12.4 kW (16.6 hp) | Not specified |
| Lift Motor Power | 20.0 kW (26.8 hp) | Not specified |
| Transmission | Synchronous reluctance motors, stepless digital control | Powershift, 1 forward / 1 reverse |
| Battery & Fuel | ||
| Battery Voltage | 90 V | Not specified |
| Battery Capacity | 670 Ah | Not specified |
| Battery Energy | 60.3 kWh | Not specified |
| Battery Type | Lithium-ion | Not specified |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | Not specified | 60.0 L (15.9 gal) |
| Dimensions | ||
| Overall Length (with forks) | 3,671 mm (12.0 ft) | Not specified |
| Length to Fork Face | 2,671 mm (8.8 ft) | 2,575 mm (8.4 ft) |
| Overall Width | 1,256 mm (49.4 in) | 1,150 mm (45.3 in) |
| Height to Overhead Guard | 2,225 mm (7.3 ft) | 2,110 mm (6.9 ft) |
| Wheelbase | 1,835 mm (72.2 in) | 1,650 mm (65.0 in) |
| Ground Clearance | 173 mm (6.8 in) | 140 mm (5.5 in) |
| Outside Turning Radius | 2,352 mm (7.7 ft) | 2,150 mm (7.1 ft) |
| Right-Angle Stacking Aisle (incl. load) | 4,008 mm (13.1 ft) | Not specified |
| Right-Angle Stacking Aisle (excl. load) | Not specified | 2,620 mm (8.6 ft) |
| Working Aisle (VDI 4.34), 1000x1200 Crossways | 4,008 mm (13.1 ft) | Not specified |
| Working Aisle (VDI 4.34), 800x1200 Lengthwise | 4,208 mm (13.8 ft) | Not specified |
| Load Distance (x) | 455 mm (17.9 in) | 470 mm (18.5 in) |
| Internal Turning Radius (b13) | 655 mm (25.8 in) | Not specified |
| Weights | ||
| Operating Weight | 4,837 kg (10,664 lb) | 3,210 kg (7,077 lb) |
| Front Axle Load (laden) | 5,663 kg (12,485 lb) | 4,600 kg (10,141 lb) |
| Rear Axle Load (laden) | 1,174 kg (2,588 lb) | 610 kg (1,345 lb) |
| Performance | ||
| Travel Speed (laden) | 22.0 km/h (13.7 mph) | 17.5 km/h (10.9 mph) |
| Travel Speed (unladen) | 22.0 km/h (13.7 mph) | 18.0 km/h (11.2 mph) |
| Lift Speed (laden) | 560 mm/s (110.2 ft/min) | 600 mm/s (118.1 ft/min) |
| Lift Speed (unladen) | 580 mm/s (114.2 ft/min) | 640 mm/s (126.0 ft/min) |
| Lowering Speed (laden) | 580 mm/s (114.2 ft/min) | 500 mm/s (98.4 ft/min) |
| Gradeability (laden) | 22.2% | 33.0% |
| Drawbar Pull (laden) | 7,600 N (1,709 lbf) | Not specified |
| Tyres, Brakes & Chassis | ||
| Tyre Type | Solid Pneumatic | Pneumatic |
| Front Tyre Size | 250/75-12 (27 x 10-12) | 7.00-12-12PR |
| Rear Tyre Size | 6.50-10 | 6.00-9-10PR |
| Wheels (front / rear) | 2x / 2 | 2x / 2 |
| Service Brake | Hydraulic / mechanical | Hydraulic |
| Operator Position | Seated | Seated |
What the numbers say
This is a cross-brand comparison: Linde X20/600 (X Series 1252), Toyota 50-8FGU20 (Core IC Pneumatic 8FGU).
Linde X20/600: 2,000 kg (at 600 mm load centre); Toyota 50-8FGU20: 1,800 kg (at 600 mm load centre). These are published ratings at the same load centre. Check the manufacturer's load chart for the exact mast, lift height and attachment configuration before selecting a truck.
The Linde X20/600 has the highest published rating at 2,000 kg, 11% more than the Toyota 50-8FGU20 at 1,800 kg.
For racking, the Toyota 50-8FGU20 reaches 3,340 mm while the Linde X20/600 tops out at 3,095 mm, a difference of 245 mm.
Per tonne of rated capacity the Toyota 50-8FGU20 weighs 1,783 kg and the Linde X20/600 weighs 2,419 kg.
Frequently asked questions
How do the published lift capacity ratings of the Linde X20/600 and Toyota 50-8FGU20 compare?
Linde X20/600: 2,000 kg (at 600 mm load centre). Toyota 50-8FGU20: 1,800 kg (at 600 mm load centre). These are published ratings at the same load centre. Check the manufacturer's load chart for the exact mast, lift height and attachment configuration before selecting a truck.
How do the lift heights of the Linde X20/600 and Toyota 50-8FGU20 compare?
Linde X20/600: 3,095 mm. Toyota 50-8FGU20: 3,340 mm.
How do the turning radii of the Linde X20/600 and Toyota 50-8FGU20 compare?
Linde X20/600: 2,352 mm. Toyota 50-8FGU20: 2,150 mm.
How do the operating weights of the Linde X20/600 and Toyota 50-8FGU20 compare?
Linde X20/600: 4,837 kg. Toyota 50-8FGU20: 3,210 kg.
What is the main difference between the Linde X20/600 and Toyota 50-8FGU20?
The Toyota 50-8FGU20 offers 13.2 kW more engine / motor power than the Linde X20/600. The Linde X20/600 offers 200 kg more rated lift capacity than the Toyota 50-8FGU20. Linde X20/600: 2,000 kg (at 600 mm load centre) · Toyota 50-8FGU20: 1,800 kg (at 600 mm load centre). These are published ratings at the same load centre. Check the manufacturer's load chart for the exact mast, lift height and attachment configuration before selecting a truck. The Toyota 50-8FGU20 offers 202 mm less outside turning radius than the Linde X20/600.
Do the Linde X20/600 and Toyota 50-8FGU20 use the same fuel type?
No. Linde X20/600: Electric. Toyota 50-8FGU20: LPG.