Hyster R1.4 vs Linde X20/600
Key differences
- Maximum Lift Height. The Hyster R1.4 offers 1,905 mm more maximum lift height than the Linde X20/600.
- Rated Lift Capacity. The Linde X20/600 offers 600 kg more rated lift capacity than the Hyster R1.4. Hyster R1.4: 1,400 kg (at 600 mm load centre) · Linde X20/600: 2,000 kg (at 600 mm load centre). These are published ratings at the same load centre. Check the manufacturer's load chart for the exact mast, lift height and attachment configuration before selecting a truck.
- Outside Turning Radius. The Hyster R1.4 offers 681 mm less outside turning radius than the Linde X20/600.
- Free Lift. The Hyster R1.4 offers 1,498 mm more free lift than the Linde X20/600.
- Gradeability (laden). The Linde X20/600 offers 15.2% more gradeability (laden) than the Hyster R1.4.
- Drive Motor Power. The Linde X20/600 offers 7.0 kW more drive motor power than the Hyster R1.4.
On rated lift capacity, Linde X20/600 leads with the higher figure at 2,000 kg versus 1,400 kg for Hyster R1.4. The measured gap is 600 kg, or 42.9% relative to the latter published value. Hyster R1.4: 1,400 kg (at 600 mm load centre) · Linde X20/600: 2,000 kg (at 600 mm load centre). These are published ratings at the same load centre. Check the manufacturer's load chart for the exact mast, lift height and attachment configuration before selecting a truck.
Hyster R1.4 leads with the higher figure on maximum lift height: its published 5,000 mm compares with 3,095 mm for Linde X20/600. That is an absolute difference of 1,905 mm (61.6% against the latter figure).
The travel speed (laden) figures separate Linde X20/600 and Hyster R1.4. Linde X20/600 leads with the higher figure with 22.0 km/h; Hyster R1.4 records 11.0 km/h, a gap of 11.0 km/h or 100.0% of that second value.
On lift speed (laden), Linde X20/600 leads with the higher figure at 560 mm/s versus 370 mm/s for Hyster R1.4. The measured gap is 190 mm/s, or 51.4% relative to the latter published value.
Linde X20/600 has the higher published figure on operating weight: its published 4,837 kg compares with 3,495 kg for Hyster R1.4. That is an absolute difference of 1,342 kg (38.4% against the latter figure).
The outside turning radius figures separate Hyster R1.4 and Linde X20/600. Hyster R1.4 leads with the lower figure with 1,671 mm; Linde X20/600 records 2,352 mm, a gap of 681 mm or 29.0% of that second value.
Highlighted values lead on that specification. An arrow indicates whether a higher or lower figure is preferred.
| Specification | Hyster R1.4 | Linde X20/600 |
|---|---|---|
| Capacity & Load | ||
| Rated Lift Capacity | 1,400 kg (3,086 lb) (at 600 mm load centre) | 2,000 kg (4,409 lb) (at 600 mm load centre) |
| Load Centre | 600 mm (23.6 in) | 600 mm (23.6 in) |
| Maximum Lift Height | 5,000 mm (16.4 ft) | 3,095 mm (10.2 ft) |
| Free Lift | 1,648 mm (64.9 in) | 150 mm (5.9 in) |
| Mast & Forks | ||
| Mast Type | 3-stage full free lift | Standard mast |
| Mast Height Lowered | 2,195 mm (7.2 ft) | 2,220 mm (7.3 ft) |
| Mast Height Extended | 5,563 mm (18.3 ft) | 3,852 mm (12.6 ft) |
| Mast Tilt Forward | 2deg | 5deg |
| Mast Tilt Backward | 4deg | 8deg |
| Fork Length | 1,150 mm (45.3 in) | 1,000 mm (39.4 in) |
| Fork Width | 80 mm (3.1 in) | 100 mm (3.9 in) |
| Fork Thickness | 40 mm (1.6 in) | 45 mm (1.8 in) |
| Fork Carriage Class | II A | 2A |
| Engine & Powertrain | ||
| Fuel Type | Electric | Electric |
| Power Source | Electric (battery) | Battery Electric |
| Engine / Motor Power | Not specified | 24.8 kW (33.3 hp) |
| Drive Motor Power | 5.4 kW (7.2 hp) | 12.4 kW (16.6 hp) |
| Lift Motor Power | 9.9 kW (13.3 hp) | 20.0 kW (26.8 hp) |
| Transmission | Not specified | Synchronous reluctance motors, stepless digital control |
| Battery & Fuel | ||
| Battery Voltage | 48 V | 90 V |
| Battery Capacity | 700 Ah | 670 Ah |
| Battery Energy | Not specified | 60.3 kWh |
| Battery Type | Lead-acid | Lithium-ion |
| Minimum Battery Weight | 1,119 kg (2,467 lb) | Not specified |
| Dimensions | ||
| Overall Length (with forks) | 2,523 mm (8.3 ft) | 3,671 mm (12.0 ft) |
| Length to Fork Face | 1,373 mm (54.1 in) | 2,671 mm (8.8 ft) |
| Overall Width | 1,265 mm (49.8 in) | 1,256 mm (49.4 in) |
| Height to Overhead Guard | 2,175 mm (7.1 ft) | 2,225 mm (7.3 ft) |
| Wheelbase | 1,400 mm (55.1 in) | 1,835 mm (72.2 in) |
| Ground Clearance | 85 mm (3.3 in) | 173 mm (6.8 in) |
| Outside Turning Radius | 1,671 mm (65.8 in) | 2,352 mm (7.7 ft) |
| Right-Angle Stacking Aisle (incl. load) | 2,826 mm (9.3 ft) | 4,008 mm (13.1 ft) |
| Working Aisle (VDI 4.34), 1000x1200 Crossways | 2,826 mm (9.3 ft) | 4,008 mm (13.1 ft) |
| Working Aisle (VDI 4.34), 800x1200 Lengthwise | 2,895 mm (9.5 ft) | 4,208 mm (13.8 ft) |
| Load Distance (x) | 258 mm (10.2 in) | 455 mm (17.9 in) |
| Internal Turning Radius (b13) | Not specified | 655 mm (25.8 in) |
| Weights | ||
| Operating Weight | 3,495 kg (7,705 lb) | 4,837 kg (10,664 lb) |
| Front Axle Load (laden) | 1,711 kg (3,772 lb) | 5,663 kg (12,485 lb) |
| Rear Axle Load (laden) | 3,184 kg (7,020 lb) | 1,174 kg (2,588 lb) |
| Performance | ||
| Travel Speed (laden) | 11.0 km/h (6.8 mph) | 22.0 km/h (13.7 mph) |
| Travel Speed (unladen) | 11.0 km/h (6.8 mph) | 22.0 km/h (13.7 mph) |
| Lift Speed (laden) | 370 mm/s (72.8 ft/min) | 560 mm/s (110.2 ft/min) |
| Lift Speed (unladen) | 630 mm/s (124.0 ft/min) | 580 mm/s (114.2 ft/min) |
| Lowering Speed (laden) | 550 mm/s (108.3 ft/min) | 580 mm/s (114.2 ft/min) |
| Gradeability (laden) | 7.0% | 22.2% |
| Drawbar Pull (laden) | Not specified | 7,600 N (1,709 lbf) |
| Tyres, Brakes & Chassis | ||
| Tyre Type | Vulkollan | Solid Pneumatic |
| Front Tyre Size | 343 x 140 | 250/75-12 (27 x 10-12) |
| Rear Tyre Size | 285 x 100 | 6.50-10 |
| Wheels (front / rear) | 1x / 2 | 2x / 2 |
| Service Brake | Electric | Hydraulic / mechanical |
| Operator Position | Seated | Seated |
| General | ||
| Noise Level at Operator Ear | 70 dB(A) | Not specified |
| Warranty | 24 months / 4,000 hours (manufacturer standard) | Not specified |
What the numbers say
This is a cross-brand comparison: Hyster R1.4 (R Series (D435)), Linde X20/600 (X Series 1252).
Hyster R1.4: 1,400 kg (at 600 mm load centre); Linde X20/600: 2,000 kg (at 600 mm load centre). These are published ratings at the same load centre. Check the manufacturer's load chart for the exact mast, lift height and attachment configuration before selecting a truck.
The Linde X20/600 has the highest published rating at 2,000 kg, 43% more than the Hyster R1.4 at 1,400 kg.
For racking, the Hyster R1.4 reaches 5,000 mm while the Linde X20/600 tops out at 3,095 mm, a difference of 1,905 mm.
Per tonne of rated capacity the Linde X20/600 weighs 2,419 kg and the Hyster R1.4 weighs 2,496 kg.
Frequently asked questions
How do the published lift capacity ratings of the Hyster R1.4 and Linde X20/600 compare?
Hyster R1.4: 1,400 kg (at 600 mm load centre). Linde X20/600: 2,000 kg (at 600 mm load centre). These are published ratings at the same load centre. Check the manufacturer's load chart for the exact mast, lift height and attachment configuration before selecting a truck.
How do the lift heights of the Hyster R1.4 and Linde X20/600 compare?
Hyster R1.4: 5,000 mm. Linde X20/600: 3,095 mm.
How do the turning radii of the Hyster R1.4 and Linde X20/600 compare?
Hyster R1.4: 1,671 mm. Linde X20/600: 2,352 mm.
How do the operating weights of the Hyster R1.4 and Linde X20/600 compare?
Hyster R1.4: 3,495 kg. Linde X20/600: 4,837 kg.
What is the main difference between the Hyster R1.4 and Linde X20/600?
The Hyster R1.4 offers 1,905 mm more maximum lift height than the Linde X20/600. The Linde X20/600 offers 600 kg more rated lift capacity than the Hyster R1.4. Hyster R1.4: 1,400 kg (at 600 mm load centre) · Linde X20/600: 2,000 kg (at 600 mm load centre). These are published ratings at the same load centre. Check the manufacturer's load chart for the exact mast, lift height and attachment configuration before selecting a truck. The Hyster R1.4 offers 681 mm less outside turning radius than the Linde X20/600.