Hyster H3.5FT vs Linde X35
Comparing 2 models on published specifications. 29 specifications are published for every model here.
Key differences
- Engine / Motor Power. Hyster H3.5FT offers 18.2 kW more engine / motor power than the next model in this comparison.
- Overall Width. Hyster H3.5FT offers 170 mm less overall width than the next model in this comparison.
- Drawbar Pull (laden). Hyster H3.5FT offers 9,850 N more drawbar pull (laden) than the next model in this comparison.
- Operating Weight. These differ: Hyster H3.5FT 4,799 kg, Linde X35 5,536 kg. Neither figure is better in itself - it depends on the application.
- Lift Speed (laden). Hyster H3.5FT offers 60 mm/s more lift speed (laden) than the next model in this comparison.
- Travel Speed (laden). Linde X35 offers 2.0 km/h more travel speed (laden) than the next model in this comparison.
| Specification | Hyster H3.5FT | Linde X35 |
|---|---|---|
| Capacity & Load | ||
| Rated Lift Capacity ↑ | 3,500 kg (7,716 lb) | 3,500 kg (7,716 lb) |
| Load Centre | 500 mm (19.7 in) | 500 mm (19.7 in) |
| Maximum Lift Height ↑ | 3,055 mm (10.0 ft) | Not specified |
| Free Lift ↑ | 140 mm (5.5 in) | 150 mm (5.9 in) (leads on this specification) |
| Mast & Forks | ||
| Mast Type | 2-stage limited free lift | Standard mast |
| Mast Height Lowered ↓ | 2,195 mm (7.2 ft) | 2,224 mm (7.3 ft) |
| Mast Height Extended | 3,805 mm (12.5 ft) | 3,856 mm (12.7 ft) |
| Mast Tilt Forward | 6deg | 5deg |
| Mast Tilt Backward | 5deg | 8deg |
| Fork Length | 1,000 mm (39.4 in) | 1,000 mm (39.4 in) |
| Fork Width | 120 mm (4.7 in) | 120 mm (4.7 in) |
| Fork Thickness | 50 mm (2.0 in) | 50 mm (2.0 in) |
| Fork Carriage Class | III A | 3A |
| Engine & Powertrain | ||
| Fuel Type | Diesel | Electric |
| Power Source | Internal Combustion | Battery Electric |
| Engine Manufacturer | Yanmar | Not specified |
| Engine Model | 4TNE98 (3.3 L) | Not specified |
| Engine / Motor Power ↑ | 43.0 kW (57.7 hp) (leads on this specification) | 24.8 kW (33.3 hp) |
| Engine Displacement | 3,319 cc | Not specified |
| Cylinders | 4 | Not specified |
| Drive Motor Power ↑ | Not specified | 12.4 kW (16.6 hp) |
| Lift Motor Power ↑ | Not specified | 20.0 kW (26.8 hp) |
| Transmission | Electronic Powershift, 1-speed | Synchronous reluctance motors, stepless digital control |
| Battery & Fuel | ||
| Battery Voltage | Not specified | 90 V |
| Battery Capacity ↑ | Not specified | 670 Ah |
| Battery Energy ↑ | Not specified | 60.3 kWh |
| Battery Type | Not specified | Lithium-ion |
| Fuel Tank Capacity ↑ | 52.8 L (13.9 gal) | Not specified |
| Dimensions | ||
| Overall Length (with forks) ↓ | 3,734 mm (12.3 ft) | 3,709 mm (12.2 ft) |
| Length to Fork Face ↓ | 2,734 mm (9.0 ft) | 2,709 mm (8.9 ft) |
| Overall Width ↓ | 1,186 mm (46.7 in) (leads on this specification) | 1,356 mm (53.4 in) |
| Height to Overhead Guard ↓ | 2,185 mm (7.2 ft) | 2,225 mm (7.3 ft) |
| Wheelbase | 1,700 mm (66.9 in) | 1,875 mm (73.8 in) |
| Ground Clearance ↑ | 185 mm (7.3 in) | 180 mm (7.1 in) |
| Outside Turning Radius ↓ | 2,380 mm (7.8 ft) | 2,394 mm (7.9 ft) |
| Right-Angle Stacking Aisle (incl. load) ↓ | 4,063 mm (13.3 ft) | 4,048 mm (13.3 ft) |
| Weights | ||
| Operating Weight | 4,799 kg (10,580 lb) | 5,536 kg (12,205 lb) |
| Front Axle Load (laden) | 7,319 kg (16,136 lb) | 7,953 kg (17,533 lb) |
| Rear Axle Load (laden) | 980 kg (2,161 lb) | 1,083 kg (2,388 lb) |
| Performance | ||
| Travel Speed (laden) ↑ | 20.0 km/h (12.4 mph) | 22.0 km/h (13.7 mph) (leads on this specification) |
| Travel Speed (unladen) ↑ | 21.1 km/h (13.1 mph) | 22.0 km/h (13.7 mph) |
| Lift Speed (laden) ↑ | 600 mm/s (118.1 ft/min) (leads on this specification) | 540 mm/s (106.3 ft/min) |
| Lift Speed (unladen) ↑ | 600 mm/s (118.1 ft/min) | 580 mm/s (114.2 ft/min) |
| Lowering Speed (laden) | 530 mm/s (104.3 ft/min) | 580 mm/s (114.2 ft/min) |
| Gradeability (laden) ↑ | 16.5% | 17.6% (leads on this specification) |
| Drawbar Pull (laden) ↑ | 17,450 N (3,923 lbf) (leads on this specification) | 7,600 N (1,709 lbf) |
| Tyres, Brakes & Chassis | ||
| Tyre Type | Solid Pneumatic | Solid Pneumatic |
| Front Tyre Size | 28 x 9-15 | 355/45-15 (28 x 12.5-15) |
| Rear Tyre Size | 6.50 x 10 | 225/75-10 (23 x 9-10) |
| Wheels (front / rear) | 2x / 2 | 2x / 2 |
| Service Brake | Hydraulic, drum | Hydraulic / mechanical |
| Operator Position | Seated | Seated |
| General | ||
| Noise Level at Operator Ear ↓ | 79 dB(A) | Not specified |
| Warranty | 24 months / 4,000 hours (manufacturer standard) | Not specified |
How to read this comparison
- A highlighted value means that model leads on that specification, and only where a higher or lower figure is objectively better. Capacity and lift height are marked; wheelbase and tyre size are not, because neither direction is universally better.
- A value is only marked when every model in the comparison published that figure. We never mark a leader against missing data.
- We do not name an overall winner. Which machine is right depends on your aisles, your shift pattern and your energy prices, which no specification table knows.
- Capacity figures are only comparable at the same load centre. Check the load centre row before comparing capacities directly.
Frequently asked questions
Which has the higher lift capacity, the Hyster H3.5FT and Linde X35?
Hyster H3.5FT: 3,500 kg. Linde X35: 3,500 kg.
What is the main difference between the Hyster H3.5FT and Linde X35?
Hyster H3.5FT offers 18.2 kW more engine / motor power than the next model in this comparison. Hyster H3.5FT offers 170 mm less overall width than the next model in this comparison. Hyster H3.5FT offers 9,850 N more drawbar pull (laden) than the next model in this comparison.
Do the Hyster H3.5FT and Linde X35 use the same fuel type?
No. Hyster H3.5FT: Diesel. Linde X35: Electric. Running costs are therefore not directly comparable without entering your own energy prices.
People also compare
Other machines in this class
Compare something else
Build your own comparison with up to four models.
Start a new comparison