Hyster H4.5FTS5 vs Linde X35
Key differences
- Engine / Motor Power. The Hyster H4.5FTS5 offers 32.2 kW more engine / motor power than the Linde X35.
- Rated Lift Capacity. The Hyster H4.5FTS5 offers 1,000 kg more rated lift capacity than the Linde X35. Hyster H4.5FTS5: 4,500 kg (at 500 mm load centre) · Linde X35: 3,500 kg (at 500 mm load centre). These are published ratings at the same load centre. Check the manufacturer's load chart for the exact mast, lift height and attachment configuration before selecting a truck.
- Outside Turning Radius. The Linde X35 offers 225 mm less outside turning radius than the Hyster H4.5FTS5.
- Drawbar Pull (laden). The Hyster H4.5FTS5 offers 18,165 N more drawbar pull (laden) than the Linde X35.
- Operating Weight. These differ: Hyster H4.5FTS5 6,826 kg, Linde X35 5,536 kg.
- Free Lift. The Linde X35 offers 50 mm more free lift than the Hyster H4.5FTS5.
On rated lift capacity, Hyster H4.5FTS5 leads with the higher figure at 4,500 kg versus 3,500 kg for Linde X35. The measured gap is 1,000 kg, or 28.6% relative to the latter published value. Hyster H4.5FTS5: 4,500 kg (at 500 mm load centre) · Linde X35: 3,500 kg (at 500 mm load centre). These are published ratings at the same load centre. Check the manufacturer's load chart for the exact mast, lift height and attachment configuration before selecting a truck.
Linde X35 leads with the higher figure on travel speed (laden): its published 22.0 km/h compares with 17.6 km/h for Hyster H4.5FTS5. That is an absolute difference of 4.4 km/h (25.0% against the latter figure).
The lift speed (laden) figures separate Linde X35 and Hyster H4.5FTS5. Linde X35 leads with the higher figure with 540 mm/s; Hyster H4.5FTS5 records 450 mm/s, a gap of 90 mm/s or 20.0% of that second value.
On operating weight, Hyster H4.5FTS5 has the higher published figure at 6,826 kg versus 5,536 kg for Linde X35. The measured gap is 1,290 kg, or 23.3% relative to the latter published value.
Linde X35 leads with the lower figure on outside turning radius: its published 2,394 mm compares with 2,619 mm for Hyster H4.5FTS5. That is an absolute difference of 225 mm (8.6% against the latter figure).
The engine / motor power figures separate Hyster H4.5FTS5 and Linde X35. Hyster H4.5FTS5 leads with the higher figure with 57.0 kW; Linde X35 records 24.8 kW, a gap of 32.2 kW or 129.8% of that second value.
Highlighted values lead on that specification. An arrow indicates whether a higher or lower figure is preferred.
| Specification | Hyster H4.5FTS5 | Linde X35 |
|---|---|---|
| Capacity & Load | ||
| Rated Lift Capacity | 4,500 kg (9,921 lb) (at 500 mm load centre) | 3,500 kg (7,716 lb) (at 500 mm load centre) |
| Load Centre | 500 mm (19.7 in) | 500 mm (19.7 in) |
| Maximum Lift Height | 2,740 mm (9.0 ft) | Not specified |
| Free Lift | 100 mm (3.9 in) | 150 mm (5.9 in) |
| Mast & Forks | ||
| Mast Type | 2-stage limited free lift | Standard mast |
| Mast Height Lowered | 2,215 mm (7.3 ft) | 2,224 mm (7.3 ft) |
| Mast Height Extended | 3,730 mm (12.2 ft) | 3,856 mm (12.7 ft) |
| Mast Tilt Forward | 6deg | 5deg |
| Mast Tilt Backward | 10deg | 8deg |
| Fork Length | 1,200 mm (47.2 in) | 1,000 mm (39.4 in) |
| Fork Width | 150 mm (5.9 in) | 120 mm (4.7 in) |
| Fork Thickness | 60 mm (2.4 in) | 50 mm (2.0 in) |
| Fork Carriage Class | IV A | 3A |
| Engine & Powertrain | ||
| Fuel Type | Diesel | Electric |
| Power Source | Internal Combustion | Battery Electric |
| Engine Manufacturer | Kubota | Not specified |
| Engine Model | V3600 IDI-T (3.6 L) | Not specified |
| Engine / Motor Power | 57.0 kW (76.4 hp) | 24.8 kW (33.3 hp) |
| Engine Displacement | 3,620 cc | Not specified |
| Cylinders | 4 | Not specified |
| Drive Motor Power | Not specified | 12.4 kW (16.6 hp) |
| Lift Motor Power | Not specified | 20.0 kW (26.8 hp) |
| Transmission | Electronic Powershift, 1-speed | Synchronous reluctance motors, stepless digital control |
| Battery & Fuel | ||
| Battery Voltage | Not specified | 90 V |
| Battery Capacity | Not specified | 670 Ah |
| Battery Energy | Not specified | 60.3 kWh |
| Battery Type | Not specified | Lithium-ion |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 79.0 L (20.9 gal) | Not specified |
| Dimensions | ||
| Overall Length (with forks) | 4,266 mm (14.0 ft) | 3,709 mm (12.2 ft) |
| Length to Fork Face | 3,066 mm (10.1 ft) | 2,709 mm (8.9 ft) |
| Overall Width | 1,402 mm (55.2 in) | 1,356 mm (53.4 in) |
| Height to Overhead Guard | 2,258 mm (7.4 ft) | 2,225 mm (7.3 ft) |
| Wheelbase | 1,830 mm (72.0 in) | 1,875 mm (73.8 in) |
| Ground Clearance | 194 mm (7.6 in) | 180 mm (7.1 in) |
| Outside Turning Radius | 2,619 mm (8.6 ft) | 2,394 mm (7.9 ft) |
| Right-Angle Stacking Aisle (incl. load) | 4,542 mm (14.9 ft) | 4,048 mm (13.3 ft) |
| Working Aisle (VDI 4.34), 1000x1200 Crossways | 4,542 mm (14.9 ft) | 4,048 mm (13.3 ft) |
| Working Aisle (VDI 4.34), 800x1200 Lengthwise | Not specified | 4,248 mm (13.9 ft) |
| Load Distance (x) | 591 mm (23.3 in) | 453 mm (17.8 in) |
| Internal Turning Radius (b13) | 751 mm (29.6 in) | 668 mm (26.3 in) |
| Weights | ||
| Operating Weight | 6,826 kg (15,049 lb) | 5,536 kg (12,205 lb) |
| Front Axle Load (laden) | 10,114 kg (22,298 lb) | 7,953 kg (17,533 lb) |
| Rear Axle Load (laden) | 1,212 kg (2,672 lb) | 1,083 kg (2,388 lb) |
| Performance | ||
| Travel Speed (laden) | 17.6 km/h (10.9 mph) | 22.0 km/h (13.7 mph) |
| Travel Speed (unladen) | 18.7 km/h (11.6 mph) | 22.0 km/h (13.7 mph) |
| Lift Speed (laden) | 450 mm/s (88.6 ft/min) | 540 mm/s (106.3 ft/min) |
| Lift Speed (unladen) | 490 mm/s (96.5 ft/min) | 580 mm/s (114.2 ft/min) |
| Lowering Speed (laden) | 510 mm/s (100.4 ft/min) | 580 mm/s (114.2 ft/min) |
| Gradeability (laden) | 24.6% | 17.6% |
| Drawbar Pull (laden) | 25,765 N (5,792 lbf) | 7,600 N (1,709 lbf) |
| Tyres, Brakes & Chassis | ||
| Tyre Type | Solid Pneumatic | Solid Pneumatic |
| Front Tyre Size | 250 x 15 | 355/45-15 (28 x 12.5-15) |
| Rear Tyre Size | 7.00 x 12 | 225/75-10 (23 x 9-10) |
| Wheels (front / rear) | 2x / 2 | 2x / 2 |
| Service Brake | Hydraulic, oil-immersed | Hydraulic / mechanical |
| Operator Position | Seated | Seated |
| General | ||
| Noise Level at Operator Ear | 81 dB(A) | Not specified |
What the numbers say
This is a cross-brand comparison: Hyster H4.5FTS5 (Fortens FT), Linde X35 (X Series 1252).
Hyster H4.5FTS5: 4,500 kg (at 500 mm load centre); Linde X35: 3,500 kg (at 500 mm load centre). These are published ratings at the same load centre. Check the manufacturer's load chart for the exact mast, lift height and attachment configuration before selecting a truck.
The Hyster H4.5FTS5 has the highest published rating at 4,500 kg, 29% more than the Linde X35 at 3,500 kg.
Per tonne of rated capacity the Hyster H4.5FTS5 weighs 1,517 kg and the Linde X35 weighs 1,582 kg.
Frequently asked questions
How do the published lift capacity ratings of the Hyster H4.5FTS5 and Linde X35 compare?
Hyster H4.5FTS5: 4,500 kg (at 500 mm load centre). Linde X35: 3,500 kg (at 500 mm load centre). These are published ratings at the same load centre. Check the manufacturer's load chart for the exact mast, lift height and attachment configuration before selecting a truck.
How do the turning radii of the Hyster H4.5FTS5 and Linde X35 compare?
Hyster H4.5FTS5: 2,619 mm. Linde X35: 2,394 mm.
How do the operating weights of the Hyster H4.5FTS5 and Linde X35 compare?
Hyster H4.5FTS5: 6,826 kg. Linde X35: 5,536 kg.
What is the main difference between the Hyster H4.5FTS5 and Linde X35?
The Hyster H4.5FTS5 offers 32.2 kW more engine / motor power than the Linde X35. The Hyster H4.5FTS5 offers 1,000 kg more rated lift capacity than the Linde X35. Hyster H4.5FTS5: 4,500 kg (at 500 mm load centre) · Linde X35: 3,500 kg (at 500 mm load centre). These are published ratings at the same load centre. Check the manufacturer's load chart for the exact mast, lift height and attachment configuration before selecting a truck. The Linde X35 offers 225 mm less outside turning radius than the Hyster H4.5FTS5.
Do the Hyster H4.5FTS5 and Linde X35 use the same fuel type?
No. Hyster H4.5FTS5: Diesel. Linde X35: Electric.