Hyster H3.0FT vs Linde X35
Key differences
- Engine / Motor Power. The Hyster H3.0FT offers 9.1 kW more engine / motor power than the Linde X35.
- Rated Lift Capacity. The Linde X35 offers 500 kg more rated lift capacity than the Hyster H3.0FT. Hyster H3.0FT: 3,000 kg (at 500 mm load centre) · Linde X35: 3,500 kg (at 500 mm load centre). These are published ratings at the same load centre. Check the manufacturer's load chart for the exact mast, lift height and attachment configuration before selecting a truck.
- Overall Width. The Hyster H3.0FT offers 170 mm less overall width than the Linde X35.
- Drawbar Pull (laden). The Hyster H3.0FT offers 8,754 N more drawbar pull (laden) than the Linde X35.
- Operating Weight. These differ: Hyster H3.0FT 4,612 kg, Linde X35 5,536 kg.
- Travel Speed (laden). The Linde X35 offers 3.8 km/h more travel speed (laden) than the Hyster H3.0FT.
On rated lift capacity, Linde X35 leads with the higher figure at 3,500 kg versus 3,000 kg for Hyster H3.0FT. The measured gap is 500 kg, or 16.7% relative to the latter published value. Hyster H3.0FT: 3,000 kg (at 500 mm load centre) · Linde X35: 3,500 kg (at 500 mm load centre). These are published ratings at the same load centre. Check the manufacturer's load chart for the exact mast, lift height and attachment configuration before selecting a truck.
Linde X35 leads with the higher figure on travel speed (laden): its published 22.0 km/h compares with 18.2 km/h for Hyster H3.0FT. That is an absolute difference of 3.8 km/h (20.9% against the latter figure).
The lift speed (laden) figures separate Linde X35 and Hyster H3.0FT. Linde X35 leads with the higher figure with 540 mm/s; Hyster H3.0FT records 470 mm/s, a gap of 70 mm/s or 14.9% of that second value.
On operating weight, Linde X35 has the higher published figure at 5,536 kg versus 4,612 kg for Hyster H3.0FT. The measured gap is 924 kg, or 20.0% relative to the latter published value.
Hyster H3.0FT leads with the lower figure on outside turning radius: its published 2,277 mm compares with 2,394 mm for Linde X35. That is an absolute difference of 117 mm (4.9% against the latter figure).
The engine / motor power figures separate Hyster H3.0FT and Linde X35. Hyster H3.0FT leads with the higher figure with 33.9 kW; Linde X35 records 24.8 kW, a gap of 9.1 kW or 36.7% of that second value.
Highlighted values lead on that specification. An arrow indicates whether a higher or lower figure is preferred.
| Specification | Hyster H3.0FT | Linde X35 |
|---|---|---|
| Capacity & Load | ||
| Rated Lift Capacity | 3,000 kg (6,614 lb) (at 500 mm load centre) | 3,500 kg (7,716 lb) (at 500 mm load centre) |
| Load Centre | 500 mm (19.7 in) | 500 mm (19.7 in) |
| Maximum Lift Height | 3,055 mm (10.0 ft) | Not specified |
| Free Lift | 140 mm (5.5 in) | 150 mm (5.9 in) |
| Mast & Forks | ||
| Mast Type | 2-stage limited free lift | Standard mast |
| Mast Height Lowered | 2,195 mm (7.2 ft) | 2,224 mm (7.3 ft) |
| Mast Height Extended | 3,805 mm (12.5 ft) | 3,856 mm (12.7 ft) |
| Mast Tilt Forward | 6deg | 5deg |
| Mast Tilt Backward | 5deg | 8deg |
| Fork Length | 1,000 mm (39.4 in) | 1,000 mm (39.4 in) |
| Fork Width | 120 mm (4.7 in) | 120 mm (4.7 in) |
| Fork Thickness | 50 mm (2.0 in) | 50 mm (2.0 in) |
| Fork Carriage Class | III A | 3A |
| Engine & Powertrain | ||
| Fuel Type | Diesel | Electric |
| Power Source | Internal Combustion | Battery Electric |
| Engine Manufacturer | Yanmar | Not specified |
| Engine Model | 4TNE92 (2.6 L) | Not specified |
| Engine / Motor Power | 33.9 kW (45.5 hp) | 24.8 kW (33.3 hp) |
| Engine Displacement | 2,659 cc | Not specified |
| Cylinders | 4 | Not specified |
| Drive Motor Power | Not specified | 12.4 kW (16.6 hp) |
| Lift Motor Power | Not specified | 20.0 kW (26.8 hp) |
| Transmission | Electronic Powershift, 1-speed | Synchronous reluctance motors, stepless digital control |
| Battery & Fuel | ||
| Battery Voltage | Not specified | 90 V |
| Battery Capacity | Not specified | 670 Ah |
| Battery Energy | Not specified | 60.3 kWh |
| Battery Type | Not specified | Lithium-ion |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 52.8 L (13.9 gal) | Not specified |
| Dimensions | ||
| Overall Length (with forks) | 3,633 mm (11.9 ft) | 3,709 mm (12.2 ft) |
| Length to Fork Face | 2,633 mm (8.6 ft) | 2,709 mm (8.9 ft) |
| Overall Width | 1,186 mm (46.7 in) | 1,356 mm (53.4 in) |
| Height to Overhead Guard | 2,185 mm (7.2 ft) | 2,225 mm (7.3 ft) |
| Wheelbase | 1,623 mm (63.9 in) | 1,875 mm (73.8 in) |
| Ground Clearance | 185 mm (7.3 in) | 180 mm (7.1 in) |
| Outside Turning Radius | 2,277 mm (7.5 ft) | 2,394 mm (7.9 ft) |
| Right-Angle Stacking Aisle (incl. load) | 3,960 mm (13.0 ft) | 4,048 mm (13.3 ft) |
| Working Aisle (VDI 4.34), 1000x1200 Crossways | 3,960 mm (13.0 ft) | 4,048 mm (13.3 ft) |
| Working Aisle (VDI 4.34), 800x1200 Lengthwise | 4,160 mm (13.6 ft) | 4,248 mm (13.9 ft) |
| Load Distance (x) | 483 mm (19.0 in) | 453 mm (17.8 in) |
| Internal Turning Radius (b13) | 618 mm (24.3 in) | 668 mm (26.3 in) |
| Weights | ||
| Operating Weight | 4,612 kg (10,168 lb) | 5,536 kg (12,205 lb) |
| Front Axle Load (laden) | 6,640 kg (14,639 lb) | 7,953 kg (17,533 lb) |
| Rear Axle Load (laden) | 972 kg (2,143 lb) | 1,083 kg (2,388 lb) |
| Performance | ||
| Travel Speed (laden) | 18.2 km/h (11.3 mph) | 22.0 km/h (13.7 mph) |
| Travel Speed (unladen) | 19.1 km/h (11.9 mph) | 22.0 km/h (13.7 mph) |
| Lift Speed (laden) | 470 mm/s (92.5 ft/min) | 540 mm/s (106.3 ft/min) |
| Lift Speed (unladen) | 620 mm/s (122.0 ft/min) | 580 mm/s (114.2 ft/min) |
| Lowering Speed (laden) | 530 mm/s (104.3 ft/min) | 580 mm/s (114.2 ft/min) |
| Gradeability (laden) | 15.0% | 17.6% |
| Drawbar Pull (laden) | 16,354 N (3,677 lbf) | 7,600 N (1,709 lbf) |
| Tyres, Brakes & Chassis | ||
| Tyre Type | Solid Pneumatic | Solid Pneumatic |
| Front Tyre Size | 28 x 9-15 | 355/45-15 (28 x 12.5-15) |
| Rear Tyre Size | 6.50 x 10 | 225/75-10 (23 x 9-10) |
| Wheels (front / rear) | 2x / 2 | 2x / 2 |
| Service Brake | Hydraulic, drum | Hydraulic / mechanical |
| Operator Position | Seated | Seated |
| General | ||
| Noise Level at Operator Ear | 79 dB(A) | Not specified |
| Warranty | 24 months / 4,000 hours (manufacturer standard) | Not specified |
What the numbers say
This is a cross-brand comparison: Hyster H3.0FT (Fortens FT), Linde X35 (X Series 1252).
Hyster H3.0FT: 3,000 kg (at 500 mm load centre); Linde X35: 3,500 kg (at 500 mm load centre). These are published ratings at the same load centre. Check the manufacturer's load chart for the exact mast, lift height and attachment configuration before selecting a truck.
The Linde X35 has the highest published rating at 3,500 kg, 17% more than the Hyster H3.0FT at 3,000 kg.
Per tonne of rated capacity the Hyster H3.0FT weighs 1,537 kg and the Linde X35 weighs 1,582 kg.
Frequently asked questions
How do the published lift capacity ratings of the Hyster H3.0FT and Linde X35 compare?
Hyster H3.0FT: 3,000 kg (at 500 mm load centre). Linde X35: 3,500 kg (at 500 mm load centre). These are published ratings at the same load centre. Check the manufacturer's load chart for the exact mast, lift height and attachment configuration before selecting a truck.
How do the turning radii of the Hyster H3.0FT and Linde X35 compare?
Hyster H3.0FT: 2,277 mm. Linde X35: 2,394 mm.
How do the operating weights of the Hyster H3.0FT and Linde X35 compare?
Hyster H3.0FT: 4,612 kg. Linde X35: 5,536 kg.
What is the main difference between the Hyster H3.0FT and Linde X35?
The Hyster H3.0FT offers 9.1 kW more engine / motor power than the Linde X35. The Linde X35 offers 500 kg more rated lift capacity than the Hyster H3.0FT. Hyster H3.0FT: 3,000 kg (at 500 mm load centre) · Linde X35: 3,500 kg (at 500 mm load centre). These are published ratings at the same load centre. Check the manufacturer's load chart for the exact mast, lift height and attachment configuration before selecting a truck. The Hyster H3.0FT offers 170 mm less overall width than the Linde X35.
Do the Hyster H3.0FT and Linde X35 use the same fuel type?
No. Hyster H3.0FT: Diesel. Linde X35: Electric.