Hyster J3.0A vs Linde X35
Key differences
- Engine / Motor Power. The Linde X35 offers 6.8 kW more engine / motor power than the Hyster J3.0A.
- Rated Lift Capacity. The Linde X35 offers 500 kg more rated lift capacity than the Hyster J3.0A. Hyster J3.0A: 3,000 kg (at 500 mm load centre) · Linde X35: 3,500 kg (at 500 mm load centre). These are published ratings at the same load centre. Check the manufacturer's load chart for the exact mast, lift height and attachment configuration before selecting a truck.
- Outside Turning Radius. The Hyster J3.0A offers 292 mm less outside turning radius than the Linde X35.
- Overall Width. The Hyster J3.0A offers 133 mm less overall width than the Linde X35.
- Gradeability (laden). The Linde X35 offers 6.6% more gradeability (laden) than the Hyster J3.0A.
- Free Lift. The Linde X35 offers 50 mm more free lift than the Hyster J3.0A.
On rated lift capacity, Linde X35 leads with the higher figure at 3,500 kg versus 3,000 kg for Hyster J3.0A. The measured gap is 500 kg, or 16.7% relative to the latter published value. Hyster J3.0A: 3,000 kg (at 500 mm load centre) · Linde X35: 3,500 kg (at 500 mm load centre). These are published ratings at the same load centre. Check the manufacturer's load chart for the exact mast, lift height and attachment configuration before selecting a truck.
Linde X35 leads with the higher figure on travel speed (laden): its published 22.0 km/h compares with 17.0 km/h for Hyster J3.0A. That is an absolute difference of 5.0 km/h (29.4% against the latter figure).
The lift speed (laden) figures separate Linde X35 and Hyster J3.0A. Linde X35 leads with the higher figure with 540 mm/s; Hyster J3.0A records 430 mm/s, a gap of 110 mm/s or 25.6% of that second value.
On operating weight, Linde X35 has the higher published figure at 5,536 kg versus 5,509 kg for Hyster J3.0A. The measured gap is 27 kg, or 0.5% relative to the latter published value.
Hyster J3.0A leads with the lower figure on outside turning radius: its published 2,102 mm compares with 2,394 mm for Linde X35. That is an absolute difference of 292 mm (12.2% against the latter figure).
The battery capacity figures separate Hyster J3.0A and Linde X35. Hyster J3.0A leads with the higher figure with 700 Ah; Linde X35 records 670 Ah, a gap of 30 Ah or 4.5% of that second value.
Highlighted values lead on that specification. An arrow indicates whether a higher or lower figure is preferred.
| Specification | Hyster J3.0A | Linde X35 |
|---|---|---|
| Capacity & Load | ||
| Rated Lift Capacity | 3,000 kg (6,614 lb) (at 500 mm load centre) | 3,500 kg (7,716 lb) (at 500 mm load centre) |
| Load Centre | 500 mm (19.7 in) | 500 mm (19.7 in) |
| Maximum Lift Height | 3,228 mm (10.6 ft) | Not specified |
| Free Lift | 100 mm (3.9 in) | 150 mm (5.9 in) |
| Mast & Forks | ||
| Mast Type | 2-stage limited free lift | Standard mast |
| Mast Height Lowered | 2,240 mm (7.3 ft) | 2,224 mm (7.3 ft) |
| Mast Height Extended | 4,498 mm (14.8 ft) | 3,856 mm (12.7 ft) |
| Mast Tilt Forward | 5deg | 5deg |
| Mast Tilt Backward | 5deg | 8deg |
| Fork Length | 1,000 mm (39.4 in) | 1,000 mm (39.4 in) |
| Fork Width | 120 mm (4.7 in) | 120 mm (4.7 in) |
| Fork Thickness | 50 mm (2.0 in) | 50 mm (2.0 in) |
| Fork Carriage Class | III A | 3A |
| Engine & Powertrain | ||
| Fuel Type | Electric | Electric |
| Power Source | Battery Electric | Battery Electric |
| Engine / Motor Power | 18.0 kW (24.1 hp) | 24.8 kW (33.3 hp) |
| Drive Motor Power | 9.0 kW (12.1 hp) | 12.4 kW (16.6 hp) |
| Lift Motor Power | 20.7 kW (27.8 hp) | 20.0 kW (26.8 hp) |
| Transmission | Induction drive control | Synchronous reluctance motors, stepless digital control |
| Battery & Fuel | ||
| Battery Voltage | 80 V | 90 V |
| Battery Capacity | 700 Ah | 670 Ah |
| Battery Energy | Not specified | 60.3 kWh |
| Battery Type | Lead-acid | Lithium-ion |
| Minimum Battery Weight | 1,770 kg (3,902 lb) | Not specified |
| Dimensions | ||
| Overall Length (with forks) | 3,525 mm (11.6 ft) | 3,709 mm (12.2 ft) |
| Length to Fork Face | 2,525 mm (8.3 ft) | 2,709 mm (8.9 ft) |
| Overall Width | 1,223 mm (48.1 in) | 1,356 mm (53.4 in) |
| Height to Overhead Guard | 2,193 mm (7.2 ft) | 2,225 mm (7.3 ft) |
| Wheelbase | 1,780 mm (70.1 in) | 1,875 mm (73.8 in) |
| Ground Clearance | 137 mm (5.4 in) | 180 mm (7.1 in) |
| Outside Turning Radius | 2,102 mm (6.9 ft) | 2,394 mm (7.9 ft) |
| Right-Angle Stacking Aisle (incl. load) | 3,805 mm (12.5 ft) | 4,048 mm (13.3 ft) |
| Working Aisle (VDI 4.34), 1000x1200 Crossways | 3,805 mm (12.5 ft) | 4,048 mm (13.3 ft) |
| Working Aisle (VDI 4.34), 800x1200 Lengthwise | 3,953 mm (13.0 ft) | 4,248 mm (13.9 ft) |
| Load Distance (x) | 434 mm (17.1 in) | 453 mm (17.8 in) |
| Internal Turning Radius (b13) | 134 mm (5.3 in) | 668 mm (26.3 in) |
| Weights | ||
| Operating Weight | 5,509 kg (12,145 lb) | 5,536 kg (12,205 lb) |
| Front Axle Load (laden) | 7,429 kg (16,378 lb) | 7,953 kg (17,533 lb) |
| Rear Axle Load (laden) | 1,079 kg (2,379 lb) | 1,083 kg (2,388 lb) |
| Performance | ||
| Travel Speed (laden) | 17.0 km/h (10.6 mph) | 22.0 km/h (13.7 mph) |
| Travel Speed (unladen) | 18.0 km/h (11.2 mph) | 22.0 km/h (13.7 mph) |
| Lift Speed (laden) | 430 mm/s (84.6 ft/min) | 540 mm/s (106.3 ft/min) |
| Lift Speed (unladen) | 560 mm/s (110.2 ft/min) | 580 mm/s (114.2 ft/min) |
| Lowering Speed (laden) | 630 mm/s (124.0 ft/min) | 580 mm/s (114.2 ft/min) |
| Gradeability (laden) | 11.0% | 17.6% |
| Drawbar Pull (laden) | 7,100 N (1,596 lbf) | 7,600 N (1,709 lbf) |
| Tyres, Brakes & Chassis | ||
| Tyre Type | Solid Pneumatic | Solid Pneumatic |
| Front Tyre Size | 23 x 10-12 | 355/45-15 (28 x 12.5-15) |
| Rear Tyre Size | 18 x 7-8 | 225/75-10 (23 x 9-10) |
| Wheels (front / rear) | 2x / 2 | 2x / 2 |
| Service Brake | Hydraulic | Hydraulic / mechanical |
| Operator Position | Seated | Seated |
| General | ||
| Noise Level at Operator Ear | 67 dB(A) | Not specified |
| Warranty | 24 months / 4,000 hours (manufacturer standard) | Not specified |
What the numbers say
This is a cross-brand comparison: Hyster J3.0A (J-A Series), Linde X35 (X Series 1252).
Hyster J3.0A: 3,000 kg (at 500 mm load centre); Linde X35: 3,500 kg (at 500 mm load centre). These are published ratings at the same load centre. Check the manufacturer's load chart for the exact mast, lift height and attachment configuration before selecting a truck.
The Linde X35 has the highest published rating at 3,500 kg, 17% more than the Hyster J3.0A at 3,000 kg.
Per tonne of rated capacity the Linde X35 weighs 1,582 kg and the Hyster J3.0A weighs 1,836 kg.
By rated capacity among the electric forklifts in this database (highest first): Hyster J3.0A 3rd of 19, Linde X35 1st of 19.
Frequently asked questions
How do the published lift capacity ratings of the Hyster J3.0A and Linde X35 compare?
Hyster J3.0A: 3,000 kg (at 500 mm load centre). Linde X35: 3,500 kg (at 500 mm load centre). These are published ratings at the same load centre. Check the manufacturer's load chart for the exact mast, lift height and attachment configuration before selecting a truck.
How do the turning radii of the Hyster J3.0A and Linde X35 compare?
Hyster J3.0A: 2,102 mm. Linde X35: 2,394 mm.
How do the operating weights of the Hyster J3.0A and Linde X35 compare?
Hyster J3.0A: 5,509 kg. Linde X35: 5,536 kg.
What is the main difference between the Hyster J3.0A and Linde X35?
The Linde X35 offers 6.8 kW more engine / motor power than the Hyster J3.0A. The Linde X35 offers 500 kg more rated lift capacity than the Hyster J3.0A. Hyster J3.0A: 3,000 kg (at 500 mm load centre) · Linde X35: 3,500 kg (at 500 mm load centre). These are published ratings at the same load centre. Check the manufacturer's load chart for the exact mast, lift height and attachment configuration before selecting a truck. The Hyster J3.0A offers 292 mm less outside turning radius than the Linde X35.