Hyster J3.0A vs Linde X35

Comparing 2 electric forklifts on published specifications. 33 specifications are published for every model here.

Key differences

  • Engine / Motor Power. Linde X35 offers 6.8 kW more engine / motor power than the next model in this comparison.
  • Rated Lift Capacity. Linde X35 offers 500 kg more rated lift capacity than the next model in this comparison.
  • Outside Turning Radius. Hyster J3.0A offers 292 mm less outside turning radius than the next model in this comparison.
  • Overall Width. Hyster J3.0A offers 133 mm less overall width than the next model in this comparison.
  • Gradeability (laden). Linde X35 offers 6.6% more gradeability (laden) than the next model in this comparison.
  • Free Lift. Linde X35 offers 50 mm more free lift than the next model in this comparison.
Specification Hyster J3.0A Linde X35
Capacity & Load
Rated Lift Capacity 3,000 kg (6,614 lb) 3,500 kg (7,716 lb) (leads on this specification)
Load Centre 500 mm (19.7 in) 500 mm (19.7 in)
Maximum Lift Height 3,228 mm (10.6 ft) Not specified
Free Lift 100 mm (3.9 in) 150 mm (5.9 in) (leads on this specification)
Mast & Forks
Mast Type 2-stage limited free lift Standard mast
Mast Height Lowered 2,240 mm (7.3 ft) 2,224 mm (7.3 ft)
Mast Height Extended 4,498 mm (14.8 ft) 3,856 mm (12.7 ft)
Mast Tilt Forward 5deg 5deg
Mast Tilt Backward 5deg 8deg
Fork Length 1,000 mm (39.4 in) 1,000 mm (39.4 in)
Fork Width 120 mm (4.7 in) 120 mm (4.7 in)
Fork Thickness 50 mm (2.0 in) 50 mm (2.0 in)
Fork Carriage Class III A 3A
Engine & Powertrain
Fuel Type Electric Electric
Power Source Battery Electric Battery Electric
Engine / Motor Power 18.0 kW (24.1 hp) 24.8 kW (33.3 hp) (leads on this specification)
Drive Motor Power 9.0 kW (12.1 hp) 12.4 kW (16.6 hp) (leads on this specification)
Lift Motor Power 20.7 kW (27.8 hp) 20.0 kW (26.8 hp)
Transmission Induction drive control Synchronous reluctance motors, stepless digital control
Battery & Fuel
Battery Voltage 80 V 90 V
Battery Capacity 700 Ah 670 Ah
Battery Energy Not specified 60.3 kWh
Battery Type Lead-acid Lithium-ion
Minimum Battery Weight 1,770 kg (3,902 lb) Not specified
Dimensions
Overall Length (with forks) 3,525 mm (11.6 ft) 3,709 mm (12.2 ft)
Length to Fork Face 2,525 mm (8.3 ft) (leads on this specification) 2,709 mm (8.9 ft)
Overall Width 1,223 mm (48.1 in) (leads on this specification) 1,356 mm (53.4 in)
Height to Overhead Guard 2,193 mm (7.2 ft) 2,225 mm (7.3 ft)
Wheelbase 1,780 mm (70.1 in) 1,875 mm (73.8 in)
Ground Clearance 137 mm (5.4 in) 180 mm (7.1 in) (leads on this specification)
Outside Turning Radius 2,102 mm (6.9 ft) (leads on this specification) 2,394 mm (7.9 ft)
Right-Angle Stacking Aisle (incl. load) 3,805 mm (12.5 ft) (leads on this specification) 4,048 mm (13.3 ft)
Weights
Operating Weight 5,509 kg (12,145 lb) 5,536 kg (12,205 lb)
Front Axle Load (laden) 7,429 kg (16,378 lb) 7,953 kg (17,533 lb)
Rear Axle Load (laden) 1,079 kg (2,379 lb) 1,083 kg (2,388 lb)
Performance
Travel Speed (laden) 17.0 km/h (10.6 mph) 22.0 km/h (13.7 mph) (leads on this specification)
Travel Speed (unladen) 18.0 km/h (11.2 mph) 22.0 km/h (13.7 mph) (leads on this specification)
Lift Speed (laden) 430 mm/s (84.6 ft/min) 540 mm/s (106.3 ft/min) (leads on this specification)
Lift Speed (unladen) 560 mm/s (110.2 ft/min) 580 mm/s (114.2 ft/min)
Lowering Speed (laden) 630 mm/s (124.0 ft/min) 580 mm/s (114.2 ft/min)
Gradeability (laden) 11.0% 17.6% (leads on this specification)
Drawbar Pull (laden) 7,100 N (1,596 lbf) 7,600 N (1,709 lbf) (leads on this specification)
Tyres, Brakes & Chassis
Tyre Type Solid Pneumatic Solid Pneumatic
Front Tyre Size 23 x 10-12 355/45-15 (28 x 12.5-15)
Rear Tyre Size 18 x 7-8 225/75-10 (23 x 9-10)
Wheels (front / rear) 2x / 2 2x / 2
Service Brake Hydraulic Hydraulic / mechanical
Operator Position Seated Seated
General
Noise Level at Operator Ear 67 dB(A) Not specified
Warranty 24 months / 4,000 hours (manufacturer standard) Not specified

How to read this comparison

  • A highlighted value means that model leads on that specification, and only where a higher or lower figure is objectively better. Capacity and lift height are marked; wheelbase and tyre size are not, because neither direction is universally better.
  • A value is only marked when every model in the comparison published that figure. We never mark a leader against missing data.
  • We do not name an overall winner. Which machine is right depends on your aisles, your shift pattern and your energy prices, which no specification table knows.
  • Capacity figures are only comparable at the same load centre. Check the load centre row before comparing capacities directly.

Which one is cheaper to run?

The specification table cannot answer that on its own. Put your own hours and energy prices into these.

Frequently asked questions

Which has the higher lift capacity, the Hyster J3.0A and Linde X35?

Hyster J3.0A: 3,000 kg. Linde X35: 3,500 kg.

What is the main difference between the Hyster J3.0A and Linde X35?

Linde X35 offers 6.8 kW more engine / motor power than the next model in this comparison. Linde X35 offers 500 kg more rated lift capacity than the next model in this comparison. Hyster J3.0A offers 292 mm less outside turning radius than the next model in this comparison.

People also compare

Other machines in this class

Linde

X30

  • Capacity3,000 kg
  • Lift height3,095 mm
  • FuelElectric

84%

Toyota

8FBC32U

  • Capacity2,950 kg
  • Lift height3,345 mm
  • FuelElectric

72%

Toyota

8FBCH32U

  • Capacity2,950 kg
  • Lift height3,345 mm
  • FuelElectric

70%

Toyota

8FBC30U

  • Capacity2,720 kg
  • Lift height3,345 mm
  • FuelElectric

72%

Linde

X25

  • Capacity2,500 kg
  • Lift height3,095 mm
  • FuelElectric

84%

Hyster

J3.5A

  • Capacity3,500 kg
  • Lift height3,228 mm
  • FuelElectric

86%

Compare something else

Build your own comparison with up to four models.

Start a new comparison