Hyster H3.0FT vs Linde X25
Key differences
- Engine / Motor Power. The Hyster H3.0FT offers 9.1 kW more engine / motor power than the Linde X25.
- Rated Lift Capacity. The Hyster H3.0FT offers 500 kg more rated lift capacity than the Linde X25. Hyster H3.0FT: 3,000 kg (at 500 mm load centre) · Linde X25: 2,500 kg (at 500 mm load centre). These are published ratings at the same load centre. Check the manufacturer's load chart for the exact mast, lift height and attachment configuration before selecting a truck.
- Overall Width. The Hyster H3.0FT offers 70 mm less overall width than the Linde X25.
- Drawbar Pull (laden). The Hyster H3.0FT offers 8,754 N more drawbar pull (laden) than the Linde X25.
- Gradeability (laden). The Linde X25 offers 5.5% more gradeability (laden) than the Hyster H3.0FT.
- Lift Speed (laden). The Linde X25 offers 100 mm/s more lift speed (laden) than the Hyster H3.0FT.
On rated lift capacity, Hyster H3.0FT leads with the higher figure at 3,000 kg versus 2,500 kg for Linde X25. The measured gap is 500 kg, or 20.0% relative to the latter published value. Hyster H3.0FT: 3,000 kg (at 500 mm load centre) · Linde X25: 2,500 kg (at 500 mm load centre). These are published ratings at the same load centre. Check the manufacturer's load chart for the exact mast, lift height and attachment configuration before selecting a truck.
Linde X25 leads with the higher figure on maximum lift height: its published 3,095 mm compares with 3,055 mm for Hyster H3.0FT. That is an absolute difference of 40 mm (1.3% against the latter figure).
The travel speed (laden) figures separate Linde X25 and Hyster H3.0FT. Linde X25 leads with the higher figure with 22.0 km/h; Hyster H3.0FT records 18.2 km/h, a gap of 3.8 km/h or 20.9% of that second value.
On lift speed (laden), Linde X25 leads with the higher figure at 570 mm/s versus 470 mm/s for Hyster H3.0FT. The measured gap is 100 mm/s, or 21.3% relative to the latter published value.
Linde X25 has the higher published figure on operating weight: its published 4,837 kg compares with 4,612 kg for Hyster H3.0FT. That is an absolute difference of 225 kg (4.9% against the latter figure).
The outside turning radius figures separate Hyster H3.0FT and Linde X25. Hyster H3.0FT leads with the lower figure with 2,277 mm; Linde X25 records 2,352 mm, a gap of 75 mm or 3.2% of that second value.
Highlighted values lead on that specification. An arrow indicates whether a higher or lower figure is preferred.
| Specification | Hyster H3.0FT | Linde X25 |
|---|---|---|
| Capacity & Load | ||
| Rated Lift Capacity | 3,000 kg (6,614 lb) (at 500 mm load centre) | 2,500 kg (5,512 lb) (at 500 mm load centre) |
| Load Centre | 500 mm (19.7 in) | 500 mm (19.7 in) |
| Maximum Lift Height | 3,055 mm (10.0 ft) | 3,095 mm (10.2 ft) |
| Free Lift | 140 mm (5.5 in) | 150 mm (5.9 in) |
| Mast & Forks | ||
| Mast Type | 2-stage limited free lift | Standard mast |
| Mast Height Lowered | 2,195 mm (7.2 ft) | 2,220 mm (7.3 ft) |
| Mast Height Extended | 3,805 mm (12.5 ft) | 3,852 mm (12.6 ft) |
| Mast Tilt Forward | 6deg | 5deg |
| Mast Tilt Backward | 5deg | 8deg |
| Fork Length | 1,000 mm (39.4 in) | 1,000 mm (39.4 in) |
| Fork Width | 120 mm (4.7 in) | 100 mm (3.9 in) |
| Fork Thickness | 50 mm (2.0 in) | 45 mm (1.8 in) |
| Fork Carriage Class | III A | 2A |
| Engine & Powertrain | ||
| Fuel Type | Diesel | Electric |
| Power Source | Internal Combustion | Battery Electric |
| Engine Manufacturer | Yanmar | Not specified |
| Engine Model | 4TNE92 (2.6 L) | Not specified |
| Engine / Motor Power | 33.9 kW (45.5 hp) | 24.8 kW (33.3 hp) |
| Engine Displacement | 2,659 cc | Not specified |
| Cylinders | 4 | Not specified |
| Drive Motor Power | Not specified | 12.4 kW (16.6 hp) |
| Lift Motor Power | Not specified | 20.0 kW (26.8 hp) |
| Transmission | Electronic Powershift, 1-speed | Synchronous reluctance motors, stepless digital control |
| Battery & Fuel | ||
| Battery Voltage | Not specified | 90 V |
| Battery Capacity | Not specified | 670 Ah |
| Battery Energy | Not specified | 60.3 kWh |
| Battery Type | Not specified | Lithium-ion |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 52.8 L (13.9 gal) | Not specified |
| Dimensions | ||
| Overall Length (with forks) | 3,633 mm (11.9 ft) | 3,671 mm (12.0 ft) |
| Length to Fork Face | 2,633 mm (8.6 ft) | 2,671 mm (8.8 ft) |
| Overall Width | 1,186 mm (46.7 in) | 1,256 mm (49.4 in) |
| Height to Overhead Guard | 2,185 mm (7.2 ft) | 2,225 mm (7.3 ft) |
| Wheelbase | 1,623 mm (63.9 in) | 1,853 mm (73.0 in) |
| Ground Clearance | 185 mm (7.3 in) | 173 mm (6.8 in) |
| Outside Turning Radius | 2,277 mm (7.5 ft) | 2,352 mm (7.7 ft) |
| Right-Angle Stacking Aisle (incl. load) | 3,960 mm (13.0 ft) | 4,008 mm (13.1 ft) |
| Working Aisle (VDI 4.34), 1000x1200 Crossways | 3,960 mm (13.0 ft) | 4,008 mm (13.1 ft) |
| Working Aisle (VDI 4.34), 800x1200 Lengthwise | 4,160 mm (13.6 ft) | 4,208 mm (13.8 ft) |
| Load Distance (x) | 483 mm (19.0 in) | 455 mm (17.9 in) |
| Internal Turning Radius (b13) | 618 mm (24.3 in) | 655 mm (25.8 in) |
| Weights | ||
| Operating Weight | 4,612 kg (10,168 lb) | 4,837 kg (10,664 lb) |
| Front Axle Load (laden) | 6,640 kg (14,639 lb) | 6,315 kg (13,922 lb) |
| Rear Axle Load (laden) | 972 kg (2,143 lb) | 1,022 kg (2,253 lb) |
| Performance | ||
| Travel Speed (laden) | 18.2 km/h (11.3 mph) | 22.0 km/h (13.7 mph) |
| Travel Speed (unladen) | 19.1 km/h (11.9 mph) | 22.0 km/h (13.7 mph) |
| Lift Speed (laden) | 470 mm/s (92.5 ft/min) | 570 mm/s (112.2 ft/min) |
| Lift Speed (unladen) | 620 mm/s (122.0 ft/min) | 580 mm/s (114.2 ft/min) |
| Lowering Speed (laden) | 530 mm/s (104.3 ft/min) | 580 mm/s (114.2 ft/min) |
| Gradeability (laden) | 15.0% | 20.5% |
| Drawbar Pull (laden) | 16,354 N (3,677 lbf) | 7,600 N (1,709 lbf) |
| Tyres, Brakes & Chassis | ||
| Tyre Type | Solid Pneumatic | Solid Pneumatic |
| Front Tyre Size | 28 x 9-15 | 250/75-12 (27 x 10-12) |
| Rear Tyre Size | 6.50 x 10 | 6.50-10 |
| Wheels (front / rear) | 2x / 2 | 2x / 2 |
| Service Brake | Hydraulic, drum | Hydraulic / mechanical |
| Operator Position | Seated | Seated |
| General | ||
| Noise Level at Operator Ear | 79 dB(A) | Not specified |
| Warranty | 24 months / 4,000 hours (manufacturer standard) | Not specified |
What the numbers say
This is a cross-brand comparison: Hyster H3.0FT (Fortens FT), Linde X25 (X Series 1252).
Hyster H3.0FT: 3,000 kg (at 500 mm load centre); Linde X25: 2,500 kg (at 500 mm load centre). These are published ratings at the same load centre. Check the manufacturer's load chart for the exact mast, lift height and attachment configuration before selecting a truck.
The Hyster H3.0FT has the highest published rating at 3,000 kg, 20% more than the Linde X25 at 2,500 kg.
For racking, the Linde X25 reaches 3,095 mm while the Hyster H3.0FT tops out at 3,055 mm, a difference of 40 mm.
Per tonne of rated capacity the Hyster H3.0FT weighs 1,537 kg and the Linde X25 weighs 1,935 kg.
Frequently asked questions
How do the published lift capacity ratings of the Hyster H3.0FT and Linde X25 compare?
Hyster H3.0FT: 3,000 kg (at 500 mm load centre). Linde X25: 2,500 kg (at 500 mm load centre). These are published ratings at the same load centre. Check the manufacturer's load chart for the exact mast, lift height and attachment configuration before selecting a truck.
How do the lift heights of the Hyster H3.0FT and Linde X25 compare?
Hyster H3.0FT: 3,055 mm. Linde X25: 3,095 mm.
How do the turning radii of the Hyster H3.0FT and Linde X25 compare?
Hyster H3.0FT: 2,277 mm. Linde X25: 2,352 mm.
How do the operating weights of the Hyster H3.0FT and Linde X25 compare?
Hyster H3.0FT: 4,612 kg. Linde X25: 4,837 kg.
What is the main difference between the Hyster H3.0FT and Linde X25?
The Hyster H3.0FT offers 9.1 kW more engine / motor power than the Linde X25. The Hyster H3.0FT offers 500 kg more rated lift capacity than the Linde X25. Hyster H3.0FT: 3,000 kg (at 500 mm load centre) · Linde X25: 2,500 kg (at 500 mm load centre). These are published ratings at the same load centre. Check the manufacturer's load chart for the exact mast, lift height and attachment configuration before selecting a truck. The Hyster H3.0FT offers 70 mm less overall width than the Linde X25.
Do the Hyster H3.0FT and Linde X25 use the same fuel type?
No. Hyster H3.0FT: Diesel. Linde X25: Electric.