Hyster H2.0FT vs Linde X25
Key differences
- Engine / Motor Power. The Hyster H2.0FT offers 9.1 kW more engine / motor power than the Linde X25.
- Rated Lift Capacity. The Linde X25 offers 500 kg more rated lift capacity than the Hyster H2.0FT.
- Outside Turning Radius. The Hyster H2.0FT offers 203 mm less outside turning radius than the Linde X25.
- Overall Width. The Hyster H2.0FT offers 99 mm less overall width than the Linde X25.
- Drawbar Pull (laden). The Hyster H2.0FT offers 9,840 N more drawbar pull (laden) than the Linde X25.
- Operating Weight. These differ: Hyster H2.0FT 3,563 kg, Linde X25 4,837 kg.
On rated lift capacity, Linde X25 leads with the higher figure at 2,500 kg versus 2,000 kg for Hyster H2.0FT. The measured gap is 500 kg, or 25.0% relative to the latter published value.
Hyster H2.0FT leads with the higher figure on maximum lift height: its published 3,250 mm compares with 3,095 mm for Linde X25. That is an absolute difference of 155 mm (5.0% against the latter figure).
The travel speed (laden) figures separate Linde X25 and Hyster H2.0FT. Linde X25 leads with the higher figure with 22.0 km/h; Hyster H2.0FT records 16.9 km/h, a gap of 5.1 km/h or 30.2% of that second value.
On lift speed (laden), Hyster H2.0FT leads with the higher figure at 660 mm/s versus 570 mm/s for Linde X25. The measured gap is 90 mm/s, or 15.8% relative to the latter published value.
Linde X25 has the higher published figure on operating weight: its published 4,837 kg compares with 3,563 kg for Hyster H2.0FT. That is an absolute difference of 1,274 kg (35.8% against the latter figure).
The outside turning radius figures separate Hyster H2.0FT and Linde X25. Hyster H2.0FT leads with the lower figure with 2,149 mm; Linde X25 records 2,352 mm, a gap of 203 mm or 8.6% of that second value.
Highlighted values lead on that specification. An arrow indicates whether a higher or lower figure is preferred.
| Specification | Hyster H2.0FT | Linde X25 |
|---|---|---|
| Capacity & Load | ||
| Rated Lift Capacity | 2,000 kg (4,409 lb) | 2,500 kg (5,512 lb) |
| Load Centre | 500 mm (19.7 in) | 500 mm (19.7 in) |
| Maximum Lift Height | 3,250 mm (10.7 ft) | 3,095 mm (10.2 ft) |
| Free Lift | 140 mm (5.5 in) | 150 mm (5.9 in) |
| Mast & Forks | ||
| Mast Type | 2-stage limited free lift | Standard mast |
| Mast Height Lowered | 2,170 mm (7.1 ft) | 2,220 mm (7.3 ft) |
| Mast Height Extended | 3,900 mm (12.8 ft) | 3,852 mm (12.6 ft) |
| Mast Tilt Forward | 6deg | 5deg |
| Mast Tilt Backward | 5deg | 8deg |
| Fork Length | 1,000 mm (39.4 in) | 1,000 mm (39.4 in) |
| Fork Width | 100 mm (3.9 in) | 100 mm (3.9 in) |
| Fork Thickness | 40 mm (1.6 in) | 45 mm (1.8 in) |
| Fork Carriage Class | II A | 2A |
| Engine & Powertrain | ||
| Fuel Type | Diesel | Electric |
| Power Source | Internal Combustion | Battery Electric |
| Engine Manufacturer | Yanmar | Not specified |
| Engine Model | 4TNE92 (2.6 L) | Not specified |
| Engine / Motor Power | 33.9 kW (45.5 hp) | 24.8 kW (33.3 hp) |
| Engine Displacement | 2,659 cc | Not specified |
| Cylinders | 4 | Not specified |
| Drive Motor Power | Not specified | 12.4 kW (16.6 hp) |
| Lift Motor Power | Not specified | 20.0 kW (26.8 hp) |
| Transmission | Electronic Powershift, 1-speed | Synchronous reluctance motors, stepless digital control |
| Battery & Fuel | ||
| Battery Voltage | Not specified | 90 V |
| Battery Capacity | Not specified | 670 Ah |
| Battery Energy | Not specified | 60.3 kWh |
| Battery Type | Not specified | Lithium-ion |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 52.8 L (13.9 gal) | Not specified |
| Dimensions | ||
| Overall Length (with forks) | 3,486 mm (11.4 ft) | 3,671 mm (12.0 ft) |
| Length to Fork Face | 2,486 mm (8.2 ft) | 2,671 mm (8.8 ft) |
| Overall Width | 1,157 mm (45.6 in) | 1,256 mm (49.4 in) |
| Height to Overhead Guard | 2,160 mm (7.1 ft) | 2,225 mm (7.3 ft) |
| Wheelbase | 1,623 mm (63.9 in) | 1,853 mm (73.0 in) |
| Ground Clearance | 160 mm (6.3 in) | 173 mm (6.8 in) |
| Outside Turning Radius | 2,149 mm (7.1 ft) | 2,352 mm (7.7 ft) |
| Right-Angle Stacking Aisle (incl. load) | 3,820 mm (12.5 ft) | 4,008 mm (13.1 ft) |
| Working Aisle (VDI 4.34), 1000x1200 Crossways | 3,820 mm (12.5 ft) | 4,008 mm (13.1 ft) |
| Working Aisle (VDI 4.34), 800x1200 Lengthwise | 4,020 mm (13.2 ft) | 4,208 mm (13.8 ft) |
| Load Distance (x) | 471 mm (18.5 in) | 455 mm (17.9 in) |
| Internal Turning Radius (b13) | 629 mm (24.8 in) | 655 mm (25.8 in) |
| Weights | ||
| Operating Weight | 3,563 kg (7,855 lb) | 4,837 kg (10,664 lb) |
| Front Axle Load (laden) | 5,048 kg (11,129 lb) | 6,315 kg (13,922 lb) |
| Rear Axle Load (laden) | 516 kg (1,138 lb) | 1,022 kg (2,253 lb) |
| Performance | ||
| Travel Speed (laden) | 16.9 km/h (10.5 mph) | 22.0 km/h (13.7 mph) |
| Travel Speed (unladen) | 18.0 km/h (11.2 mph) | 22.0 km/h (13.7 mph) |
| Lift Speed (laden) | 660 mm/s (129.9 ft/min) | 570 mm/s (112.2 ft/min) |
| Lift Speed (unladen) | 710 mm/s (139.8 ft/min) | 580 mm/s (114.2 ft/min) |
| Lowering Speed (laden) | 580 mm/s (114.2 ft/min) | 580 mm/s (114.2 ft/min) |
| Gradeability (laden) | 21.3% | 20.5% |
| Drawbar Pull (laden) | 17,440 N (3,921 lbf) | 7,600 N (1,709 lbf) |
| Tyres, Brakes & Chassis | ||
| Tyre Type | Solid Pneumatic | Solid Pneumatic |
| Front Tyre Size | 7.00 x 12-12 | 250/75-12 (27 x 10-12) |
| Rear Tyre Size | 6.00 x 9 | 6.50-10 |
| Wheels (front / rear) | 2x / 2 | 2x / 2 |
| Service Brake | Hydraulic, drum | Hydraulic / mechanical |
| Operator Position | Seated | Seated |
| General | ||
| Noise Level at Operator Ear | 79 dB(A) | Not specified |
| Warranty | 24 months / 4,000 hours (manufacturer standard) | Not specified |
What the numbers say
This is a cross-brand comparison: Hyster H2.0FT (Fortens FT), Linde X25 (X Series 1252).
The Linde X25 carries the most at 2,500 kg, 25% more than the Hyster H2.0FT at 2,000 kg.
For racking, the Hyster H2.0FT reaches 3,250 mm while the Linde X25 tops out at 3,095 mm, a difference of 155 mm.
Per tonne of rated capacity the Hyster H2.0FT weighs 1,782 kg and the Linde X25 weighs 1,935 kg.
Frequently asked questions
Which has the higher lift capacity, the Hyster H2.0FT and Linde X25?
Hyster H2.0FT: 2,000 kg. Linde X25: 2,500 kg.
How do the lift heights of the Hyster H2.0FT and Linde X25 compare?
Hyster H2.0FT: 3,250 mm. Linde X25: 3,095 mm.
How do the turning radii of the Hyster H2.0FT and Linde X25 compare?
Hyster H2.0FT: 2,149 mm. Linde X25: 2,352 mm.
How do the operating weights of the Hyster H2.0FT and Linde X25 compare?
Hyster H2.0FT: 3,563 kg. Linde X25: 4,837 kg.
What is the main difference between the Hyster H2.0FT and Linde X25?
The Hyster H2.0FT offers 9.1 kW more engine / motor power than the Linde X25. The Linde X25 offers 500 kg more rated lift capacity than the Hyster H2.0FT. The Hyster H2.0FT offers 203 mm less outside turning radius than the Linde X25.
Do the Hyster H2.0FT and Linde X25 use the same fuel type?
No. Hyster H2.0FT: Diesel. Linde X25: Electric.