Hyster H2.0FT vs Yale GLP20VX

Comparing 2 models on published specifications. 34 specifications are published for every model here.

Key differences

  • Engine / Motor Power. Yale GLP20VX offers 10.1 kW more engine / motor power than the next model in this comparison.
  • Lift Speed (unladen). Hyster H2.0FT offers 80 mm/s more lift speed (unladen) than the next model in this comparison.
  • Gradeability (laden). Hyster H2.0FT offers 2.3% more gradeability (laden) than the next model in this comparison.
  • Lift Speed (laden). Hyster H2.0FT offers 50 mm/s more lift speed (laden) than the next model in this comparison.
  • Drawbar Pull (laden). Yale GLP20VX offers 1,280 N more drawbar pull (laden) than the next model in this comparison.
  • Engine Displacement. These differ: Hyster H2.0FT 2,659 cc, Yale GLP20VX 2,351 cc. Neither figure is better in itself - it depends on the application.
Specification Hyster H2.0FT Yale GLP20VX
Capacity & Load
Rated Lift Capacity 2,000 kg (4,409 lb) 2,000 kg (4,409 lb)
Load Centre 500 mm (19.7 in) 500 mm (19.7 in)
Maximum Lift Height 3,250 mm (10.7 ft) 3,250 mm (10.7 ft)
Free Lift 140 mm (5.5 in) 140 mm (5.5 in)
Mast & Forks
Mast Type 2-stage limited free lift 2-stage limited free lift
Mast Height Lowered 2,170 mm (7.1 ft) 2,170 mm (7.1 ft)
Mast Height Extended 3,900 mm (12.8 ft) 3,904 mm (12.8 ft)
Mast Tilt Forward 6deg 6deg
Mast Tilt Backward 5deg 5deg
Fork Length 1,000 mm (39.4 in) 1,000 mm (39.4 in)
Fork Width 100 mm (3.9 in) 100 mm (3.9 in)
Fork Thickness 40 mm (1.6 in) 40 mm (1.6 in)
Fork Carriage Class II A II A
Engine & Powertrain
Fuel Type Diesel LPG
Power Source Internal Combustion Internal Combustion
Engine Manufacturer Yanmar PSI
Engine Model 4TNE92 (2.6 L) 2.4 L LPG
Engine / Motor Power 33.9 kW (45.5 hp) 44.0 kW (59.0 hp) (leads on this specification)
Engine Displacement 2,659 cc 2,351 cc
Cylinders 4 4
Transmission Electronic Powershift, 1-speed Electronic Powershift
Battery & Fuel
Fuel Tank Capacity 52.8 L (13.9 gal) 52.8 L (13.9 gal)
Dimensions
Overall Length (with forks) 3,486 mm (11.4 ft) 3,486 mm (11.4 ft)
Length to Fork Face 2,486 mm (8.2 ft) 2,486 mm (8.2 ft)
Overall Width 1,157 mm (45.6 in) 1,157 mm (45.6 in)
Height to Overhead Guard 2,160 mm (7.1 ft) 2,160 mm (7.1 ft)
Wheelbase 1,623 mm (63.9 in) 1,623 mm (63.9 in)
Ground Clearance 160 mm (6.3 in) 160 mm (6.3 in)
Outside Turning Radius 2,149 mm (7.1 ft) 2,149 mm (7.1 ft)
Right-Angle Stacking Aisle (incl. load) 3,820 mm (12.5 ft) 3,820 mm (12.5 ft)
Weights
Operating Weight 3,563 kg (7,855 lb) 3,563 kg (7,855 lb)
Front Axle Load (laden) 5,048 kg (11,129 lb) 5,048 kg (11,129 lb)
Rear Axle Load (laden) 516 kg (1,138 lb) 516 kg (1,138 lb)
Performance
Travel Speed (laden) 16.9 km/h (10.5 mph) 17.3 km/h (10.7 mph)
Travel Speed (unladen) 18.0 km/h (11.2 mph) 18.0 km/h (11.2 mph)
Lift Speed (laden) 660 mm/s (129.9 ft/min) (leads on this specification) 610 mm/s (120.1 ft/min)
Lift Speed (unladen) 710 mm/s (139.8 ft/min) (leads on this specification) 630 mm/s (124.0 ft/min)
Lowering Speed (laden) 580 mm/s (114.2 ft/min) 580 mm/s (114.2 ft/min)
Gradeability (laden) 21.3% (leads on this specification) 19.0%
Drawbar Pull (laden) 17,440 N (3,921 lbf) 18,720 N (4,208 lbf) (leads on this specification)
Tyres, Brakes & Chassis
Tyre Type Solid Pneumatic Solid Pneumatic
Front Tyre Size 7.00 x 12-12 7.00 x 12-12
Rear Tyre Size 6.00 x 9 6.00 x 9
Wheels (front / rear) 2x / 2 2x / 2
Service Brake Hydraulic, drum Hydraulic, drum
Operator Position Seated Seated
General
Noise Level at Operator Ear 79 dB(A) 77 dB(A)
Warranty 24 months / 4,000 hours (manufacturer standard) Not specified

How to read this comparison

  • A highlighted value means that model leads on that specification, and only where a higher or lower figure is objectively better. Capacity and lift height are marked; wheelbase and tyre size are not, because neither direction is universally better.
  • A value is only marked when every model in the comparison published that figure. We never mark a leader against missing data.
  • We do not name an overall winner. Which machine is right depends on your aisles, your shift pattern and your energy prices, which no specification table knows.
  • Capacity figures are only comparable at the same load centre. Check the load centre row before comparing capacities directly.

Which one is cheaper to run?

The specification table cannot answer that on its own. Put your own hours and energy prices into these.

Frequently asked questions

Which has the higher lift capacity, the Hyster H2.0FT and Yale GLP20VX?

Hyster H2.0FT: 2,000 kg. Yale GLP20VX: 2,000 kg.

What is the main difference between the Hyster H2.0FT and Yale GLP20VX?

Yale GLP20VX offers 10.1 kW more engine / motor power than the next model in this comparison. Hyster H2.0FT offers 80 mm/s more lift speed (unladen) than the next model in this comparison. Hyster H2.0FT offers 2.3% more gradeability (laden) than the next model in this comparison.

Do the Hyster H2.0FT and Yale GLP20VX use the same fuel type?

No. Hyster H2.0FT: Diesel. Yale GLP20VX: LPG. Running costs are therefore not directly comparable without entering your own energy prices.

People also compare

Other machines in this class

Linde

X20/600

  • Capacity2,000 kg
  • Lift height3,095 mm
  • FuelElectric

84%

Toyota

8FBC20U

  • Capacity1,810 kg
  • Lift height3,340 mm
  • FuelElectric

72%

Toyota

8FBC20U-COMP

  • Capacity1,810 kg
  • Lift height3,340 mm
  • FuelElectric

72%

Toyota

40-8FGU20

  • Capacity1,800 kg
  • Lift height3,340 mm
  • FuelDual Fuel LPG/Petrol

77%

Toyota

50-8FGU20

  • Capacity1,800 kg
  • Lift height3,340 mm
  • FuelLPG

77%

Hyster

H2.0A LPG

  • Capacity2,000 kg
  • Lift height3,900 mm
  • FuelLPG

82%

Compare something else

Build your own comparison with up to four models.

Start a new comparison