Hyster H3.0FT vs Yale GLP30VX

Comparing 2 models on published specifications. 34 specifications are published for every model here.

Key differences

  • Engine / Motor Power. Yale GLP30VX offers 10.1 kW more engine / motor power than the next model in this comparison.
  • Lift Speed (laden). Yale GLP30VX offers 60 mm/s more lift speed (laden) than the next model in this comparison.
  • Lift Speed (unladen). Hyster H3.0FT offers 70 mm/s more lift speed (unladen) than the next model in this comparison.
  • Gradeability (laden). Yale GLP30VX offers 1.9% more gradeability (laden) than the next model in this comparison.
  • Travel Speed (unladen). Yale GLP30VX offers 1.2 km/h more travel speed (unladen) than the next model in this comparison.
  • Engine Displacement. These differ: Hyster H3.0FT 2,659 cc, Yale GLP30VX 2,351 cc. Neither figure is better in itself - it depends on the application.
Specification Hyster H3.0FT Yale GLP30VX
Capacity & Load
Rated Lift Capacity 3,000 kg (6,614 lb) 3,000 kg (6,614 lb)
Load Centre 500 mm (19.7 in) 500 mm (19.7 in)
Maximum Lift Height 3,055 mm (10.0 ft) 3,055 mm (10.0 ft)
Free Lift 140 mm (5.5 in) 140 mm (5.5 in)
Mast & Forks
Mast Type 2-stage limited free lift 2-stage limited free lift
Mast Height Lowered 2,195 mm (7.2 ft) 2,195 mm (7.2 ft)
Mast Height Extended 3,805 mm (12.5 ft) 3,809 mm (12.5 ft)
Mast Tilt Forward 6deg 6deg
Mast Tilt Backward 5deg 5deg
Fork Length 1,000 mm (39.4 in) 1,000 mm (39.4 in)
Fork Width 120 mm (4.7 in) 120 mm (4.7 in)
Fork Thickness 50 mm (2.0 in) 50 mm (2.0 in)
Fork Carriage Class III A III A
Engine & Powertrain
Fuel Type Diesel LPG
Power Source Internal Combustion Internal Combustion
Engine Manufacturer Yanmar PSI
Engine Model 4TNE92 (2.6 L) 2.4 L LPG
Engine / Motor Power 33.9 kW (45.5 hp) 44.0 kW (59.0 hp) (leads on this specification)
Engine Displacement 2,659 cc 2,351 cc
Cylinders 4 4
Transmission Electronic Powershift, 1-speed Electronic Powershift
Battery & Fuel
Fuel Tank Capacity 52.8 L (13.9 gal) 52.8 L (13.9 gal)
Dimensions
Overall Length (with forks) 3,633 mm (11.9 ft) 3,633 mm (11.9 ft)
Length to Fork Face 2,633 mm (8.6 ft) 2,633 mm (8.6 ft)
Overall Width 1,186 mm (46.7 in) 1,186 mm (46.7 in)
Height to Overhead Guard 2,185 mm (7.2 ft) 2,185 mm (7.2 ft)
Wheelbase 1,623 mm (63.9 in) 1,623 mm (63.9 in)
Ground Clearance 185 mm (7.3 in) 185 mm (7.3 in)
Outside Turning Radius 2,277 mm (7.5 ft) 2,277 mm (7.5 ft)
Right-Angle Stacking Aisle (incl. load) 3,960 mm (13.0 ft) 3,955 mm (13.0 ft)
Weights
Operating Weight 4,612 kg (10,168 lb) 4,612 kg (10,168 lb)
Front Axle Load (laden) 6,640 kg (14,639 lb) 6,640 kg (14,639 lb)
Rear Axle Load (laden) 972 kg (2,143 lb) 972 kg (2,143 lb)
Performance
Travel Speed (laden) 18.2 km/h (11.3 mph) 19.1 km/h (11.9 mph)
Travel Speed (unladen) 19.1 km/h (11.9 mph) 20.3 km/h (12.6 mph) (leads on this specification)
Lift Speed (laden) 470 mm/s (92.5 ft/min) 530 mm/s (104.3 ft/min) (leads on this specification)
Lift Speed (unladen) 620 mm/s (122.0 ft/min) (leads on this specification) 550 mm/s (108.3 ft/min)
Lowering Speed (laden) 530 mm/s (104.3 ft/min) 530 mm/s (104.3 ft/min)
Gradeability (laden) 15.0% 16.9% (leads on this specification)
Drawbar Pull (laden) 16,354 N (3,677 lbf) 17,054 N (3,834 lbf)
Tyres, Brakes & Chassis
Tyre Type Solid Pneumatic Solid Pneumatic
Front Tyre Size 28 x 9-15 28 x 9-15
Rear Tyre Size 6.50 x 10 6.50 x 10
Wheels (front / rear) 2x / 2 2x / 2
Service Brake Hydraulic, drum Hydraulic, drum
Operator Position Seated Seated
General
Noise Level at Operator Ear 79 dB(A) 77 dB(A)
Warranty 24 months / 4,000 hours (manufacturer standard) Not specified

How to read this comparison

  • A highlighted value means that model leads on that specification, and only where a higher or lower figure is objectively better. Capacity and lift height are marked; wheelbase and tyre size are not, because neither direction is universally better.
  • A value is only marked when every model in the comparison published that figure. We never mark a leader against missing data.
  • We do not name an overall winner. Which machine is right depends on your aisles, your shift pattern and your energy prices, which no specification table knows.
  • Capacity figures are only comparable at the same load centre. Check the load centre row before comparing capacities directly.

Which one is cheaper to run?

The specification table cannot answer that on its own. Put your own hours and energy prices into these.

Frequently asked questions

Which has the higher lift capacity, the Hyster H3.0FT and Yale GLP30VX?

Hyster H3.0FT: 3,000 kg. Yale GLP30VX: 3,000 kg.

What is the main difference between the Hyster H3.0FT and Yale GLP30VX?

Yale GLP30VX offers 10.1 kW more engine / motor power than the next model in this comparison. Yale GLP30VX offers 60 mm/s more lift speed (laden) than the next model in this comparison. Hyster H3.0FT offers 70 mm/s more lift speed (unladen) than the next model in this comparison.

Do the Hyster H3.0FT and Yale GLP30VX use the same fuel type?

No. Hyster H3.0FT: Diesel. Yale GLP30VX: LPG. Running costs are therefore not directly comparable without entering your own energy prices.

People also compare

Other machines in this class

Linde

X30

  • Capacity3,000 kg
  • Lift height3,095 mm
  • FuelElectric

84%

Toyota

40-8FGU32

  • Capacity3,000 kg
  • Lift height3,345 mm
  • FuelDual Fuel LPG/Petrol

77%

Toyota

50-8FGU32

  • Capacity3,000 kg
  • Lift height3,345 mm
  • FuelLPG

77%

Toyota

8FBC32U

  • Capacity2,950 kg
  • Lift height3,345 mm
  • FuelElectric

72%

Toyota

8FBCH32U

  • Capacity2,950 kg
  • Lift height3,345 mm
  • FuelElectric

70%

Hyster

H3.0A LPG

  • Capacity3,000 kg
  • Lift height3,880 mm
  • FuelLPG

82%

Compare something else

Build your own comparison with up to four models.

Start a new comparison