Hyster H3.5A vs Linde X35
Comparing 2 models on published specifications. 29 specifications are published for every model here.
Key differences
- Engine / Motor Power. Hyster H3.5A offers 19.2 kW more engine / motor power than the next model in this comparison.
- Overall Width. Hyster H3.5A offers 170 mm less overall width than the next model in this comparison.
- Free Lift. Linde X35 offers 100 mm more free lift than the next model in this comparison.
- Drawbar Pull (laden). Hyster H3.5A offers 11,421 N more drawbar pull (laden) than the next model in this comparison.
- Operating Weight. These differ: Hyster H3.5A 4,910 kg, Linde X35 5,536 kg. Neither figure is better in itself - it depends on the application.
- Gradeability (laden). Hyster H3.5A offers 6.4% more gradeability (laden) than the next model in this comparison.
| Specification | Hyster H3.5A | Linde X35 |
|---|---|---|
| Capacity & Load | ||
| Rated Lift Capacity ↑ | 3,500 kg (7,716 lb) | 3,500 kg (7,716 lb) |
| Load Centre | 500 mm (19.7 in) | 500 mm (19.7 in) |
| Maximum Lift Height ↑ | 3,880 mm (12.7 ft) | Not specified |
| Free Lift ↑ | 50 mm (2.0 in) | 150 mm (5.9 in) (leads on this specification) |
| Mast & Forks | ||
| Mast Type | 2-stage limited free lift | Standard mast |
| Mast Height Lowered ↓ | 2,692 mm (8.8 ft) | 2,224 mm (7.3 ft) (leads on this specification) |
| Mast Height Extended | 4,552 mm (14.9 ft) | 3,856 mm (12.7 ft) |
| Mast Tilt Forward | 6deg | 5deg |
| Mast Tilt Backward | 6deg | 8deg |
| Fork Length | 1,000 mm (39.4 in) | 1,000 mm (39.4 in) |
| Fork Width | 120 mm (4.7 in) | 120 mm (4.7 in) |
| Fork Thickness | 50 mm (2.0 in) | 50 mm (2.0 in) |
| Fork Carriage Class | III A | 3A |
| Engine & Powertrain | ||
| Fuel Type | Diesel | Electric |
| Power Source | Internal Combustion | Battery Electric |
| Engine Manufacturer | Yanmar | Not specified |
| Engine Model | 4TNV86CHT (2.1 L) | Not specified |
| Engine / Motor Power ↑ | 44.0 kW (59.0 hp) (leads on this specification) | 24.8 kW (33.3 hp) |
| Engine Displacement | 2,091 cc | Not specified |
| Cylinders | 4 | Not specified |
| Drive Motor Power ↑ | Not specified | 12.4 kW (16.6 hp) |
| Lift Motor Power ↑ | Not specified | 20.0 kW (26.8 hp) |
| Transmission | Electronic Powershift, 1-speed | Synchronous reluctance motors, stepless digital control |
| Battery & Fuel | ||
| Battery Voltage | Not specified | 90 V |
| Battery Capacity ↑ | Not specified | 670 Ah |
| Battery Energy ↑ | Not specified | 60.3 kWh |
| Battery Type | Not specified | Lithium-ion |
| Fuel Tank Capacity ↑ | 39.9 L (10.5 gal) | Not specified |
| Dimensions | ||
| Overall Length (with forks) ↓ | 3,813 mm (12.5 ft) | 3,709 mm (12.2 ft) |
| Length to Fork Face ↓ | 2,781 mm (9.1 ft) | 2,709 mm (8.9 ft) |
| Overall Width ↓ | 1,186 mm (46.7 in) (leads on this specification) | 1,356 mm (53.4 in) |
| Height to Overhead Guard ↓ | 2,182 mm (7.2 ft) | 2,225 mm (7.3 ft) |
| Wheelbase | 1,700 mm (66.9 in) | 1,875 mm (73.8 in) |
| Ground Clearance ↑ | 182 mm (7.2 in) | 180 mm (7.1 in) |
| Outside Turning Radius ↓ | 2,449 mm (8.0 ft) | 2,394 mm (7.9 ft) |
| Right-Angle Stacking Aisle (incl. load) ↓ | 4,144 mm (13.6 ft) | 4,048 mm (13.3 ft) |
| Weights | ||
| Operating Weight | 4,910 kg (10,825 lb) | 5,536 kg (12,205 lb) |
| Front Axle Load (laden) | 7,230 kg (15,939 lb) | 7,953 kg (17,533 lb) |
| Rear Axle Load (laden) | 1,180 kg (2,601 lb) | 1,083 kg (2,388 lb) |
| Performance | ||
| Travel Speed (laden) ↑ | 18.4 km/h (11.4 mph) | 22.0 km/h (13.7 mph) (leads on this specification) |
| Travel Speed (unladen) ↑ | 18.6 km/h (11.6 mph) | 22.0 km/h (13.7 mph) (leads on this specification) |
| Lift Speed (laden) ↑ | 560 mm/s (110.2 ft/min) | 540 mm/s (106.3 ft/min) |
| Lift Speed (unladen) ↑ | 610 mm/s (120.1 ft/min) | 580 mm/s (114.2 ft/min) |
| Lowering Speed (laden) | 580 mm/s (114.2 ft/min) | 580 mm/s (114.2 ft/min) |
| Gradeability (laden) ↑ | 24.0% (leads on this specification) | 17.6% |
| Drawbar Pull (laden) ↑ | 19,021 N (4,276 lbf) (leads on this specification) | 7,600 N (1,709 lbf) |
| Tyres, Brakes & Chassis | ||
| Tyre Type | Solid Pneumatic | Solid Pneumatic |
| Front Tyre Size | 28 x 9-15 | 355/45-15 (28 x 12.5-15) |
| Rear Tyre Size | 6.5 x 10 | 225/75-10 (23 x 9-10) |
| Wheels (front / rear) | 2x / 2 | 2x / 2 |
| Service Brake | Hydraulic, drum | Hydraulic / mechanical |
| Operator Position | Seated | Seated |
| General | ||
| Noise Level at Operator Ear ↓ | 79 dB(A) | Not specified |
| Warranty | 24 months / 4,000 hours (manufacturer standard) | Not specified |
How to read this comparison
- A highlighted value means that model leads on that specification, and only where a higher or lower figure is objectively better. Capacity and lift height are marked; wheelbase and tyre size are not, because neither direction is universally better.
- A value is only marked when every model in the comparison published that figure. We never mark a leader against missing data.
- We do not name an overall winner. Which machine is right depends on your aisles, your shift pattern and your energy prices, which no specification table knows.
- Capacity figures are only comparable at the same load centre. Check the load centre row before comparing capacities directly.
Frequently asked questions
Which has the higher lift capacity, the Hyster H3.5A and Linde X35?
Hyster H3.5A: 3,500 kg. Linde X35: 3,500 kg.
What is the main difference between the Hyster H3.5A and Linde X35?
Hyster H3.5A offers 19.2 kW more engine / motor power than the next model in this comparison. Hyster H3.5A offers 170 mm less overall width than the next model in this comparison. Linde X35 offers 100 mm more free lift than the next model in this comparison.
Do the Hyster H3.5A and Linde X35 use the same fuel type?
No. Hyster H3.5A: Diesel. Linde X35: Electric. Running costs are therefore not directly comparable without entering your own energy prices.
People also compare
Other machines in this class
Compare something else
Build your own comparison with up to four models.
Start a new comparison