Hyster H3.0FT vs Linde X30

Key differences

  • Engine / Motor Power. The Hyster H3.0FT offers 9.1 kW more engine / motor power than the Linde X30.
  • Overall Width. The Hyster H3.0FT offers 70 mm less overall width than the Linde X30.
  • Drawbar Pull (laden). The Hyster H3.0FT offers 8,754 N more drawbar pull (laden) than the Linde X30.
  • Operating Weight. These differ: Hyster H3.0FT 4,612 kg, Linde X30 5,121 kg.
  • Gradeability (laden). The Linde X30 offers 3.3% more gradeability (laden) than the Hyster H3.0FT.
  • Lift Speed (laden). The Linde X30 offers 100 mm/s more lift speed (laden) than the Hyster H3.0FT.

On maximum lift height, Linde X30 leads with the higher figure at 3,095 mm versus 3,055 mm for Hyster H3.0FT. The measured gap is 40 mm, or 1.3% relative to the latter published value.

Linde X30 leads with the higher figure on travel speed (laden): its published 22.0 km/h compares with 18.2 km/h for Hyster H3.0FT. That is an absolute difference of 3.8 km/h (20.9% against the latter figure).

The lift speed (laden) figures separate Linde X30 and Hyster H3.0FT. Linde X30 leads with the higher figure with 570 mm/s; Hyster H3.0FT records 470 mm/s, a gap of 100 mm/s or 21.3% of that second value.

On operating weight, Linde X30 has the higher published figure at 5,121 kg versus 4,612 kg for Hyster H3.0FT. The measured gap is 509 kg, or 11.0% relative to the latter published value.

Hyster H3.0FT leads with the lower figure on outside turning radius: its published 2,277 mm compares with 2,394 mm for Linde X30. That is an absolute difference of 117 mm (4.9% against the latter figure).

The engine / motor power figures separate Hyster H3.0FT and Linde X30. Hyster H3.0FT leads with the higher figure with 33.9 kW; Linde X30 records 24.8 kW, a gap of 9.1 kW or 36.7% of that second value.

Highlighted values lead on that specification. An arrow indicates whether a higher or lower figure is preferred.

Specification Hyster H3.0FT Linde X30
Capacity & Load
Rated Lift Capacity 3,000 kg (6,614 lb) (at 500 mm load centre) 3,000 kg (6,614 lb) (at 500 mm load centre)
Load Centre 500 mm (19.7 in) 500 mm (19.7 in)
Maximum Lift Height 3,055 mm (10.0 ft) 3,095 mm (10.2 ft)
Free Lift 140 mm (5.5 in) 150 mm (5.9 in)
Mast & Forks
Mast Type 2-stage limited free lift Standard mast
Mast Height Lowered 2,195 mm (7.2 ft) 2,218 mm (7.3 ft)
Mast Height Extended 3,805 mm (12.5 ft) 3,850 mm (12.6 ft)
Mast Tilt Forward 6deg 5deg
Mast Tilt Backward 5deg 8deg
Fork Length 1,000 mm (39.4 in) 1,000 mm (39.4 in)
Fork Width 120 mm (4.7 in) 100 mm (3.9 in)
Fork Thickness 50 mm (2.0 in) 45 mm (1.8 in)
Fork Carriage Class III A 3A
Engine & Powertrain
Fuel Type Diesel Electric
Power Source Internal Combustion Battery Electric
Engine Manufacturer Yanmar Not specified
Engine Model 4TNE92 (2.6 L) Not specified
Engine / Motor Power 33.9 kW (45.5 hp) 24.8 kW (33.3 hp)
Engine Displacement 2,659 cc Not specified
Cylinders 4 Not specified
Drive Motor Power Not specified 12.4 kW (16.6 hp)
Lift Motor Power Not specified 20.0 kW (26.8 hp)
Transmission Electronic Powershift, 1-speed Synchronous reluctance motors, stepless digital control
Battery & Fuel
Battery Voltage Not specified 90 V
Battery Capacity Not specified 670 Ah
Battery Energy Not specified 60.3 kWh
Battery Type Not specified Lithium-ion
Fuel Tank Capacity 52.8 L (13.9 gal) Not specified
Dimensions
Overall Length (with forks) 3,633 mm (11.9 ft) 3,704 mm (12.2 ft)
Length to Fork Face 2,633 mm (8.6 ft) 2,704 mm (8.9 ft)
Overall Width 1,186 mm (46.7 in) 1,256 mm (49.4 in)
Height to Overhead Guard 2,185 mm (7.2 ft) 2,225 mm (7.3 ft)
Wheelbase 1,623 mm (63.9 in) 1,875 mm (73.8 in)
Ground Clearance 185 mm (7.3 in) 178 mm (7.0 in)
Outside Turning Radius 2,277 mm (7.5 ft) 2,394 mm (7.9 ft)
Right-Angle Stacking Aisle (incl. load) 3,960 mm (13.0 ft) 4,043 mm (13.3 ft)
Working Aisle (VDI 4.34), 1000x1200 Crossways 3,960 mm (13.0 ft) 4,043 mm (13.3 ft)
Working Aisle (VDI 4.34), 800x1200 Lengthwise 4,160 mm (13.6 ft) 4,243 mm (13.9 ft)
Load Distance (x) 483 mm (19.0 in) 448 mm (17.6 in)
Internal Turning Radius (b13) 618 mm (24.3 in) 668 mm (26.3 in)
Weights
Operating Weight 4,612 kg (10,168 lb) 5,121 kg (11,290 lb)
Front Axle Load (laden) 6,640 kg (14,639 lb) 7,104 kg (15,662 lb)
Rear Axle Load (laden) 972 kg (2,143 lb) 1,017 kg (2,242 lb)
Performance
Travel Speed (laden) 18.2 km/h (11.3 mph) 22.0 km/h (13.7 mph)
Travel Speed (unladen) 19.1 km/h (11.9 mph) 22.0 km/h (13.7 mph)
Lift Speed (laden) 470 mm/s (92.5 ft/min) 570 mm/s (112.2 ft/min)
Lift Speed (unladen) 620 mm/s (122.0 ft/min) 580 mm/s (114.2 ft/min)
Lowering Speed (laden) 530 mm/s (104.3 ft/min) 580 mm/s (114.2 ft/min)
Gradeability (laden) 15.0% 18.3%
Drawbar Pull (laden) 16,354 N (3,677 lbf) 7,600 N (1,709 lbf)
Tyres, Brakes & Chassis
Tyre Type Solid Pneumatic Solid Pneumatic
Front Tyre Size 28 x 9-15 250/75-12 (27 x 10-12)
Rear Tyre Size 6.50 x 10 225/75-10 (23 x 9-10)
Wheels (front / rear) 2x / 2 2x / 2
Service Brake Hydraulic, drum Hydraulic / mechanical
Operator Position Seated Seated
General
Noise Level at Operator Ear 79 dB(A) Not specified
Warranty 24 months / 4,000 hours (manufacturer standard) Not specified

What the numbers say

This is a cross-brand comparison: Hyster H3.0FT (Fortens FT), Linde X30 (X Series 1252).

Hyster H3.0FT: 3,000 kg (at 500 mm load centre); Linde X30: 3,000 kg (at 500 mm load centre). These are published ratings at the same load centre. Check the manufacturer's load chart for the exact mast, lift height and attachment configuration before selecting a truck.

The Hyster H3.0FT and Linde X30 are rated at 3,000 kg, so capacity does not separate them.

For racking, the Linde X30 reaches 3,095 mm while the Hyster H3.0FT tops out at 3,055 mm, a difference of 40 mm.

Per tonne of rated capacity the Hyster H3.0FT weighs 1,537 kg and the Linde X30 weighs 1,707 kg.

Running cost

Frequently asked questions

How do the lift heights of the Hyster H3.0FT and Linde X30 compare?

Hyster H3.0FT: 3,055 mm. Linde X30: 3,095 mm.

How do the turning radii of the Hyster H3.0FT and Linde X30 compare?

Hyster H3.0FT: 2,277 mm. Linde X30: 2,394 mm.

How do the operating weights of the Hyster H3.0FT and Linde X30 compare?

Hyster H3.0FT: 4,612 kg. Linde X30: 5,121 kg.

What is the main difference between the Hyster H3.0FT and Linde X30?

The Hyster H3.0FT offers 9.1 kW more engine / motor power than the Linde X30. The Hyster H3.0FT offers 70 mm less overall width than the Linde X30. The Hyster H3.0FT offers 8,754 N more drawbar pull (laden) than the Linde X30.

Do the Hyster H3.0FT and Linde X30 use the same fuel type?

No. Hyster H3.0FT: Diesel. Linde X30: Electric.

People also compare

Other machines in this class

Yale

GLP30VX

  • Capacity3,000 kg
  • Lift height3,055 mm
  • FuelLPG

82%

Toyota

40-8FGU32

  • Capacity3,000 kg
  • Lift height3,345 mm
  • FuelDual Fuel LPG/Petrol

77%

Toyota

50-8FGU32

  • Capacity3,000 kg
  • Lift height3,345 mm
  • FuelLPG

77%

Toyota

8FBC32U

  • Capacity2,950 kg
  • Lift height3,345 mm
  • FuelElectric

72%

Toyota

8FBCH32U

  • Capacity2,950 kg
  • Lift height3,345 mm
  • FuelElectric

70%

Hyster

J3.0A

  • Capacity3,000 kg
  • Lift height3,228 mm
  • FuelElectric

86%

Compare something else

Start a new comparison