Hyster H2.0FT vs Toyota 8FBCH25U
Key differences
- Engine / Motor Power. The Hyster H2.0FT offers 19.1 kW more engine / motor power than the Toyota 8FBCH25U.
- Outside Turning Radius. The Toyota 8FBCH25U offers 209 mm less outside turning radius than the Hyster H2.0FT.
- Overall Width. The Toyota 8FBCH25U offers 92 mm less overall width than the Hyster H2.0FT.
- Ground Clearance. The Hyster H2.0FT offers 60 mm more ground clearance than the Toyota 8FBCH25U.
- Lift Speed (laden). The Hyster H2.0FT offers 140 mm/s more lift speed (laden) than the Toyota 8FBCH25U.
- Rated Lift Capacity. Hyster H2.0FT: 2,000 kg (at 500 mm load centre) · Toyota 8FBCH25U: 2,270 kg (at 600 mm load centre). Load centres differ or are not specified; these capacity ratings are not directly comparable and do not establish a capacity winner. Check the manufacturer's load chart for the exact mast, lift height and attachment configuration before selecting a truck.
Hyster H2.0FT: 2,000 kg (at 500 mm load centre) · Toyota 8FBCH25U: 2,270 kg (at 600 mm load centre). Load centres differ or are not specified; these capacity ratings are not directly comparable and do not establish a capacity winner. Check the manufacturer's load chart for the exact mast, lift height and attachment configuration before selecting a truck.
Toyota 8FBCH25U leads with the higher figure on maximum lift height: its published 3,340 mm compares with 3,250 mm for Hyster H2.0FT. That is an absolute difference of 90 mm (2.8% against the latter figure).
The travel speed (laden) figures separate Toyota 8FBCH25U and Hyster H2.0FT. Toyota 8FBCH25U leads with the higher figure with 19.5 km/h; Hyster H2.0FT records 16.9 km/h, a gap of 2.6 km/h or 15.4% of that second value.
On lift speed (laden), Hyster H2.0FT leads with the higher figure at 660 mm/s versus 520 mm/s for Toyota 8FBCH25U. The measured gap is 140 mm/s, or 26.9% relative to the latter published value.
Toyota 8FBCH25U leads with the lower figure on outside turning radius: its published 1,940 mm compares with 2,149 mm for Hyster H2.0FT. That is an absolute difference of 209 mm (9.7% against the latter figure).
The engine / motor power figures separate Hyster H2.0FT and Toyota 8FBCH25U. Hyster H2.0FT leads with the higher figure with 33.9 kW; Toyota 8FBCH25U records 14.8 kW, a gap of 19.1 kW or 129.1% of that second value.
Highlighted values lead on that specification. An arrow indicates whether a higher or lower figure is preferred.
| Specification | Hyster H2.0FT | Toyota 8FBCH25U |
|---|---|---|
| Capacity & Load | ||
| Rated Lift Capacity | 2,000 kg (4,409 lb) (at 500 mm load centre) | 2,270 kg (5,004 lb) (at 600 mm load centre) |
| Load Centre | 500 mm (19.7 in) | 600 mm (23.6 in) |
| Maximum Lift Height | 3,250 mm (10.7 ft) | 3,340 mm (11.0 ft) |
| Free Lift | 140 mm (5.5 in) | 155 mm (6.1 in) |
| Mast & Forks | ||
| Mast Type | 2-stage limited free lift | Wide-view 2-stage (V) |
| Mast Height Lowered | 2,170 mm (7.1 ft) | 2,110 mm (6.9 ft) |
| Mast Height Extended | 3,900 mm (12.8 ft) | 4,560 mm (15.0 ft) |
| Mast Tilt Forward | 6deg | 6deg |
| Mast Tilt Backward | 5deg | 8deg |
| Fork Length | 1,000 mm (39.4 in) | 1,070 mm (42.1 in) |
| Fork Width | 100 mm (3.9 in) | 125 mm (4.9 in) |
| Fork Thickness | 40 mm (1.6 in) | 40 mm (1.6 in) |
| Fork Carriage Class | II A | Not specified |
| Engine & Powertrain | ||
| Fuel Type | Diesel | Electric |
| Power Source | Internal Combustion | Battery Electric |
| Engine Manufacturer | Yanmar | Not specified |
| Engine Model | 4TNE92 (2.6 L) | Not specified |
| Engine / Motor Power | 33.9 kW (45.5 hp) | 14.8 kW (19.8 hp) |
| Engine Displacement | 2,659 cc | Not specified |
| Cylinders | 4 | Not specified |
| Drive Motor Power | Not specified | 14.8 kW (19.8 hp) |
| Lift Motor Power | Not specified | 21.5 kW (28.8 hp) |
| Transmission | Electronic Powershift, 1-speed | AC drive, transistor inverter |
| Battery & Fuel | ||
| Battery Voltage | Not specified | 48 V |
| Battery Capacity | Not specified | 850 Ah |
| Battery Type | Not specified | Lead-acid |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 52.8 L (13.9 gal) | Not specified |
| Dimensions | ||
| Overall Length (with forks) | 3,486 mm (11.4 ft) | Not specified |
| Length to Fork Face | 2,486 mm (8.2 ft) | 2,170 mm (7.1 ft) |
| Overall Width | 1,157 mm (45.6 in) | 1,065 mm (41.9 in) |
| Height to Overhead Guard | 2,160 mm (7.1 ft) | 2,235 mm (7.3 ft) |
| Wheelbase | 1,623 mm (63.9 in) | 1,390 mm (54.7 in) |
| Ground Clearance | 160 mm (6.3 in) | 100 mm (3.9 in) |
| Outside Turning Radius | 2,149 mm (7.1 ft) | 1,940 mm (76.4 in) |
| Right-Angle Stacking Aisle (incl. load) | 3,820 mm (12.5 ft) | Not specified |
| Right-Angle Stacking Aisle (excl. load) | Not specified | 2,365 mm (7.8 ft) |
| Working Aisle (VDI 4.34), 1000x1200 Crossways | 3,820 mm (12.5 ft) | Not specified |
| Working Aisle (VDI 4.34), 800x1200 Lengthwise | 4,020 mm (13.2 ft) | Not specified |
| Load Distance (x) | 471 mm (18.5 in) | 425 mm (16.7 in) |
| Internal Turning Radius (b13) | 629 mm (24.8 in) | Not specified |
| Weights | ||
| Operating Weight | 3,563 kg (7,855 lb) | Not specified |
| Front Axle Load (laden) | 5,048 kg (11,129 lb) | Not specified |
| Rear Axle Load (laden) | 516 kg (1,138 lb) | Not specified |
| Performance | ||
| Travel Speed (laden) | 16.9 km/h (10.5 mph) | 19.5 km/h (12.1 mph) |
| Travel Speed (unladen) | 18.0 km/h (11.2 mph) | 19.0 km/h (11.8 mph) |
| Lift Speed (laden) | 660 mm/s (129.9 ft/min) | 520 mm/s (102.4 ft/min) |
| Lift Speed (unladen) | 710 mm/s (139.8 ft/min) | 660 mm/s (129.9 ft/min) |
| Lowering Speed (laden) | 580 mm/s (114.2 ft/min) | 500 mm/s (98.4 ft/min) |
| Gradeability (laden) | 21.3% | 21.0% |
| Drawbar Pull (laden) | 17,440 N (3,921 lbf) | Not specified |
| Tyres, Brakes & Chassis | ||
| Tyre Type | Solid Pneumatic | Cushion |
| Front Tyre Size | 7.00 x 12-12 | 21 x 7 x 15 |
| Rear Tyre Size | 6.00 x 9 | 16 x 5 x 10.5 |
| Wheels (front / rear) | 2x / 2 | 2x / 2 |
| Service Brake | Hydraulic, drum | Hydraulic |
| Operator Position | Seated | Seated |
| General | ||
| Noise Level at Operator Ear | 79 dB(A) | Not specified |
| Warranty | 24 months / 4,000 hours (manufacturer standard) | Not specified |
What the numbers say
This is a cross-brand comparison: Hyster H2.0FT (Fortens FT), Toyota 8FBCH25U (Core Electric 8FBC).
Hyster H2.0FT: 2,000 kg (at 500 mm load centre); Toyota 8FBCH25U: 2,270 kg (at 600 mm load centre). Load centres differ or are not specified; these capacity ratings are not directly comparable and do not establish a capacity winner. Check the manufacturer's load chart for the exact mast, lift height and attachment configuration before selecting a truck.
For racking, the Toyota 8FBCH25U reaches 3,340 mm while the Hyster H2.0FT tops out at 3,250 mm, a difference of 90 mm.
Frequently asked questions
How do the published lift capacity ratings of the Hyster H2.0FT and Toyota 8FBCH25U compare?
Hyster H2.0FT: 2,000 kg (at 500 mm load centre). Toyota 8FBCH25U: 2,270 kg (at 600 mm load centre). Load centres differ or are not specified; these capacity ratings are not directly comparable and do not establish a capacity winner. Check the manufacturer's load chart for the exact mast, lift height and attachment configuration before selecting a truck.
How do the lift heights of the Hyster H2.0FT and Toyota 8FBCH25U compare?
Hyster H2.0FT: 3,250 mm. Toyota 8FBCH25U: 3,340 mm.
How do the turning radii of the Hyster H2.0FT and Toyota 8FBCH25U compare?
Hyster H2.0FT: 2,149 mm. Toyota 8FBCH25U: 1,940 mm.
What is the main difference between the Hyster H2.0FT and Toyota 8FBCH25U?
The Hyster H2.0FT offers 19.1 kW more engine / motor power than the Toyota 8FBCH25U. The Toyota 8FBCH25U offers 209 mm less outside turning radius than the Hyster H2.0FT. The Toyota 8FBCH25U offers 92 mm less overall width than the Hyster H2.0FT.
Do the Hyster H2.0FT and Toyota 8FBCH25U use the same fuel type?
No. Hyster H2.0FT: Diesel. Toyota 8FBCH25U: Electric.