Hyster H2.0FT vs Toyota 40-8FGU20
Comparing 2 models on published specifications. 30 specifications are published for every model here.
Key differences
- Engine / Motor Power. Toyota 40-8FGU20 offers 10.1 kW more engine / motor power than the next model in this comparison.
- Rated Lift Capacity. Hyster H2.0FT offers 200 kg more rated lift capacity than the next model in this comparison.
- Gradeability (laden). Toyota 40-8FGU20 offers 9.7% more gradeability (laden) than the next model in this comparison.
- Operating Weight. These differ: Hyster H2.0FT 3,563 kg, Toyota 40-8FGU20 3,280 kg. Neither figure is better in itself - it depends on the application.
- Ground Clearance. Hyster H2.0FT offers 20 mm more ground clearance than the next model in this comparison.
- Fuel Tank Capacity. Toyota 40-8FGU20 offers 7.2 L more fuel tank capacity than the next model in this comparison.
| Specification | Hyster H2.0FT | Toyota 40-8FGU20 |
|---|---|---|
| Capacity & Load | ||
| Rated Lift Capacity ↑ | 2,000 kg (4,409 lb) (leads on this specification) | 1,800 kg (3,968 lb) |
| Load Centre | 500 mm (19.7 in) | 600 mm (23.6 in) |
| Maximum Lift Height ↑ | 3,250 mm (10.7 ft) | 3,340 mm (11.0 ft) |
| Free Lift ↑ | 140 mm (5.5 in) | 155 mm (6.1 in) (leads on this specification) |
| Mast & Forks | ||
| Mast Type | 2-stage limited free lift | Wide-view 2-stage (V) |
| Mast Height Lowered ↓ | 2,170 mm (7.1 ft) | 2,145 mm (7.0 ft) |
| Mast Height Extended | 3,900 mm (12.8 ft) | 4,560 mm (15.0 ft) |
| Mast Tilt Forward | 6deg | 6deg |
| Mast Tilt Backward | 5deg | 11deg |
| Fork Length | 1,000 mm (39.4 in) | 1,070 mm (42.1 in) |
| Fork Width | 100 mm (3.9 in) | 125 mm (4.9 in) |
| Fork Thickness | 40 mm (1.6 in) | 40 mm (1.6 in) |
| Fork Carriage Class | II A | Not specified |
| Engine & Powertrain | ||
| Fuel Type | Diesel | Dual Fuel LPG/Petrol |
| Power Source | Internal Combustion | Internal Combustion |
| Engine Manufacturer | Yanmar | Kubota |
| Engine Model | 4TNE92 (2.6 L) | WG2503 (2.5 L) |
| Engine / Motor Power ↑ | 33.9 kW (45.5 hp) | 44.0 kW (59.0 hp) (leads on this specification) |
| Engine Displacement | 2,659 cc | 2,491 cc |
| Cylinders | 4 | 4 |
| Transmission | Electronic Powershift, 1-speed | Powershift, 1 forward / 1 reverse |
| Battery & Fuel | ||
| Fuel Tank Capacity ↑ | 52.8 L (13.9 gal) | 60.0 L (15.9 gal) (leads on this specification) |
| Dimensions | ||
| Overall Length (with forks) ↓ | 3,486 mm (11.4 ft) | Not specified |
| Length to Fork Face ↓ | 2,486 mm (8.2 ft) | 2,575 mm (8.4 ft) |
| Overall Width ↓ | 1,157 mm (45.6 in) | 1,150 mm (45.3 in) |
| Height to Overhead Guard ↓ | 2,160 mm (7.1 ft) | 2,110 mm (6.9 ft) |
| Wheelbase | 1,623 mm (63.9 in) | 1,650 mm (65.0 in) |
| Ground Clearance ↑ | 160 mm (6.3 in) (leads on this specification) | 140 mm (5.5 in) |
| Outside Turning Radius ↓ | 2,149 mm (7.1 ft) | 2,150 mm (7.1 ft) |
| Right-Angle Stacking Aisle (incl. load) ↓ | 3,820 mm (12.5 ft) | Not specified |
| Right-Angle Stacking Aisle (excl. load) ↓ | Not specified | 2,620 mm (8.6 ft) |
| Weights | ||
| Operating Weight | 3,563 kg (7,855 lb) | 3,280 kg (7,231 lb) |
| Front Axle Load (laden) | 5,048 kg (11,129 lb) | 4,630 kg (10,207 lb) |
| Rear Axle Load (laden) | 516 kg (1,138 lb) | 650 kg (1,433 lb) |
| Performance | ||
| Travel Speed (laden) ↑ | 16.9 km/h (10.5 mph) | 17.5 km/h (10.9 mph) |
| Travel Speed (unladen) ↑ | 18.0 km/h (11.2 mph) | 18.0 km/h (11.2 mph) |
| Lift Speed (laden) ↑ | 660 mm/s (129.9 ft/min) (leads on this specification) | 600 mm/s (118.1 ft/min) |
| Lift Speed (unladen) ↑ | 710 mm/s (139.8 ft/min) (leads on this specification) | 630 mm/s (124.0 ft/min) |
| Lowering Speed (laden) | 580 mm/s (114.2 ft/min) | 500 mm/s (98.4 ft/min) |
| Gradeability (laden) ↑ | 21.3% | 31.0% (leads on this specification) |
| Drawbar Pull (laden) ↑ | 17,440 N (3,921 lbf) | Not specified |
| Tyres, Brakes & Chassis | ||
| Tyre Type | Solid Pneumatic | Pneumatic |
| Front Tyre Size | 7.00 x 12-12 | 7.00-12-12PR |
| Rear Tyre Size | 6.00 x 9 | 6.00-9-10PR |
| Wheels (front / rear) | 2x / 2 | 2x / 2 |
| Service Brake | Hydraulic, drum | Hydraulic |
| Operator Position | Seated | Seated |
| General | ||
| Noise Level at Operator Ear ↓ | 79 dB(A) | Not specified |
| Warranty | 24 months / 4,000 hours (manufacturer standard) | Not specified |
How to read this comparison
- A highlighted value means that model leads on that specification, and only where a higher or lower figure is objectively better. Capacity and lift height are marked; wheelbase and tyre size are not, because neither direction is universally better.
- A value is only marked when every model in the comparison published that figure. We never mark a leader against missing data.
- We do not name an overall winner. Which machine is right depends on your aisles, your shift pattern and your energy prices, which no specification table knows.
- Capacity figures are only comparable at the same load centre. Check the load centre row before comparing capacities directly.
Frequently asked questions
Which has the higher lift capacity, the Hyster H2.0FT and Toyota 40-8FGU20?
Hyster H2.0FT: 2,000 kg. Toyota 40-8FGU20: 1,800 kg.
What is the main difference between the Hyster H2.0FT and Toyota 40-8FGU20?
Toyota 40-8FGU20 offers 10.1 kW more engine / motor power than the next model in this comparison. Hyster H2.0FT offers 200 kg more rated lift capacity than the next model in this comparison. Toyota 40-8FGU20 offers 9.7% more gradeability (laden) than the next model in this comparison.
Do the Hyster H2.0FT and Toyota 40-8FGU20 use the same fuel type?
No. Hyster H2.0FT: Diesel. Toyota 40-8FGU20: Dual Fuel LPG/Petrol. Running costs are therefore not directly comparable without entering your own energy prices.
People also compare
Other machines in this class
Compare something else
Build your own comparison with up to four models.
Start a new comparison