Hyster H2.0FT vs Toyota 8FBC20U-COMP
Key differences
- Engine / Motor Power. The Hyster H2.0FT offers 19.1 kW more engine / motor power than the Toyota 8FBC20U-COMP.
- Outside Turning Radius. The Toyota 8FBC20U-COMP offers 409 mm less outside turning radius than the Hyster H2.0FT.
- Overall Width. The Toyota 8FBC20U-COMP offers 92 mm less overall width than the Hyster H2.0FT.
- Ground Clearance. The Hyster H2.0FT offers 60 mm more ground clearance than the Toyota 8FBC20U-COMP.
- Lift Speed (laden). The Hyster H2.0FT offers 140 mm/s more lift speed (laden) than the Toyota 8FBC20U-COMP.
- Rated Lift Capacity. Hyster H2.0FT: 2,000 kg (at 500 mm load centre) · Toyota 8FBC20U-COMP: 1,810 kg (at 600 mm load centre). Load centres differ or are not specified; these capacity ratings are not directly comparable and do not establish a capacity winner. Check the manufacturer's load chart for the exact mast, lift height and attachment configuration before selecting a truck.
Hyster H2.0FT: 2,000 kg (at 500 mm load centre) · Toyota 8FBC20U-COMP: 1,810 kg (at 600 mm load centre). Load centres differ or are not specified; these capacity ratings are not directly comparable and do not establish a capacity winner. Check the manufacturer's load chart for the exact mast, lift height and attachment configuration before selecting a truck.
Toyota 8FBC20U-COMP leads with the higher figure on maximum lift height: its published 3,340 mm compares with 3,250 mm for Hyster H2.0FT. That is an absolute difference of 90 mm (2.8% against the latter figure).
The travel speed (laden) figures separate Toyota 8FBC20U-COMP and Hyster H2.0FT. Toyota 8FBC20U-COMP leads with the higher figure with 19.5 km/h; Hyster H2.0FT records 16.9 km/h, a gap of 2.6 km/h or 15.4% of that second value.
On lift speed (laden), Hyster H2.0FT leads with the higher figure at 660 mm/s versus 520 mm/s for Toyota 8FBC20U-COMP. The measured gap is 140 mm/s, or 26.9% relative to the latter published value.
Toyota 8FBC20U-COMP leads with the lower figure on outside turning radius: its published 1,740 mm compares with 2,149 mm for Hyster H2.0FT. That is an absolute difference of 409 mm (19.0% against the latter figure).
The engine / motor power figures separate Hyster H2.0FT and Toyota 8FBC20U-COMP. Hyster H2.0FT leads with the higher figure with 33.9 kW; Toyota 8FBC20U-COMP records 14.8 kW, a gap of 19.1 kW or 129.1% of that second value.
Highlighted values lead on that specification. An arrow indicates whether a higher or lower figure is preferred.
| Specification | Hyster H2.0FT | Toyota 8FBC20U-COMP |
|---|---|---|
| Capacity & Load | ||
| Rated Lift Capacity | 2,000 kg (4,409 lb) (at 500 mm load centre) | 1,810 kg (3,990 lb) (at 600 mm load centre) |
| Load Centre | 500 mm (19.7 in) | 600 mm (23.6 in) |
| Maximum Lift Height | 3,250 mm (10.7 ft) | 3,340 mm (11.0 ft) |
| Free Lift | 140 mm (5.5 in) | 155 mm (6.1 in) |
| Mast & Forks | ||
| Mast Type | 2-stage limited free lift | Wide-view 2-stage (V) |
| Mast Height Lowered | 2,170 mm (7.1 ft) | 2,115 mm (6.9 ft) |
| Mast Height Extended | 3,900 mm (12.8 ft) | 4,560 mm (15.0 ft) |
| Mast Tilt Forward | 6deg | 6deg |
| Mast Tilt Backward | 5deg | 8deg |
| Fork Length | 1,000 mm (39.4 in) | 1,070 mm (42.1 in) |
| Fork Width | 100 mm (3.9 in) | 125 mm (4.9 in) |
| Fork Thickness | 40 mm (1.6 in) | 40 mm (1.6 in) |
| Fork Carriage Class | II A | Not specified |
| Engine & Powertrain | ||
| Fuel Type | Diesel | Electric |
| Power Source | Internal Combustion | Battery Electric |
| Engine Manufacturer | Yanmar | Not specified |
| Engine Model | 4TNE92 (2.6 L) | Not specified |
| Engine / Motor Power | 33.9 kW (45.5 hp) | 14.8 kW (19.8 hp) |
| Engine Displacement | 2,659 cc | Not specified |
| Cylinders | 4 | Not specified |
| Drive Motor Power | Not specified | 14.8 kW (19.8 hp) |
| Lift Motor Power | Not specified | 21.5 kW (28.8 hp) |
| Transmission | Electronic Powershift, 1-speed | AC drive, transistor inverter |
| Battery & Fuel | ||
| Battery Voltage | Not specified | 48 V |
| Battery Capacity | Not specified | 680 Ah |
| Battery Type | Not specified | Lead-acid |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 52.8 L (13.9 gal) | Not specified |
| Dimensions | ||
| Overall Length (with forks) | 3,486 mm (11.4 ft) | Not specified |
| Length to Fork Face | 2,486 mm (8.2 ft) | 2,030 mm (6.7 ft) |
| Overall Width | 1,157 mm (45.6 in) | 1,065 mm (41.9 in) |
| Height to Overhead Guard | 2,160 mm (7.1 ft) | 2,235 mm (7.3 ft) |
| Wheelbase | 1,623 mm (63.9 in) | 1,295 mm (51.0 in) |
| Ground Clearance | 160 mm (6.3 in) | 100 mm (3.9 in) |
| Outside Turning Radius | 2,149 mm (7.1 ft) | 1,740 mm (68.5 in) |
| Right-Angle Stacking Aisle (incl. load) | 3,820 mm (12.5 ft) | Not specified |
| Right-Angle Stacking Aisle (excl. load) | Not specified | 2,165 mm (7.1 ft) |
| Working Aisle (VDI 4.34), 1000x1200 Crossways | 3,820 mm (12.5 ft) | Not specified |
| Working Aisle (VDI 4.34), 800x1200 Lengthwise | 4,020 mm (13.2 ft) | Not specified |
| Load Distance (x) | 471 mm (18.5 in) | 425 mm (16.7 in) |
| Internal Turning Radius (b13) | 629 mm (24.8 in) | Not specified |
| Weights | ||
| Operating Weight | 3,563 kg (7,855 lb) | Not specified |
| Front Axle Load (laden) | 5,048 kg (11,129 lb) | Not specified |
| Rear Axle Load (laden) | 516 kg (1,138 lb) | Not specified |
| Performance | ||
| Travel Speed (laden) | 16.9 km/h (10.5 mph) | 19.5 km/h (12.1 mph) |
| Travel Speed (unladen) | 18.0 km/h (11.2 mph) | 19.0 km/h (11.8 mph) |
| Lift Speed (laden) | 660 mm/s (129.9 ft/min) | 520 mm/s (102.4 ft/min) |
| Lift Speed (unladen) | 710 mm/s (139.8 ft/min) | 660 mm/s (129.9 ft/min) |
| Lowering Speed (laden) | 580 mm/s (114.2 ft/min) | 500 mm/s (98.4 ft/min) |
| Gradeability (laden) | 21.3% | 25.0% |
| Drawbar Pull (laden) | 17,440 N (3,921 lbf) | Not specified |
| Tyres, Brakes & Chassis | ||
| Tyre Type | Solid Pneumatic | Cushion |
| Front Tyre Size | 7.00 x 12-12 | 21 x 7 x 15 |
| Rear Tyre Size | 6.00 x 9 | 16 x 5 x 10.5 |
| Wheels (front / rear) | 2x / 2 | 2x / 2 |
| Service Brake | Hydraulic, drum | Hydraulic |
| Operator Position | Seated | Seated |
| General | ||
| Noise Level at Operator Ear | 79 dB(A) | Not specified |
| Warranty | 24 months / 4,000 hours (manufacturer standard) | Not specified |
What the numbers say
This is a cross-brand comparison: Hyster H2.0FT (Fortens FT), Toyota 8FBC20U-COMP (Core Electric 8FBC).
Hyster H2.0FT: 2,000 kg (at 500 mm load centre); Toyota 8FBC20U-COMP: 1,810 kg (at 600 mm load centre). Load centres differ or are not specified; these capacity ratings are not directly comparable and do not establish a capacity winner. Check the manufacturer's load chart for the exact mast, lift height and attachment configuration before selecting a truck.
For racking, the Toyota 8FBC20U-COMP reaches 3,340 mm while the Hyster H2.0FT tops out at 3,250 mm, a difference of 90 mm.
Frequently asked questions
How do the published lift capacity ratings of the Hyster H2.0FT and Toyota 8FBC20U-COMP compare?
Hyster H2.0FT: 2,000 kg (at 500 mm load centre). Toyota 8FBC20U-COMP: 1,810 kg (at 600 mm load centre). Load centres differ or are not specified; these capacity ratings are not directly comparable and do not establish a capacity winner. Check the manufacturer's load chart for the exact mast, lift height and attachment configuration before selecting a truck.
How do the lift heights of the Hyster H2.0FT and Toyota 8FBC20U-COMP compare?
Hyster H2.0FT: 3,250 mm. Toyota 8FBC20U-COMP: 3,340 mm.
How do the turning radii of the Hyster H2.0FT and Toyota 8FBC20U-COMP compare?
Hyster H2.0FT: 2,149 mm. Toyota 8FBC20U-COMP: 1,740 mm.
What is the main difference between the Hyster H2.0FT and Toyota 8FBC20U-COMP?
The Hyster H2.0FT offers 19.1 kW more engine / motor power than the Toyota 8FBC20U-COMP. The Toyota 8FBC20U-COMP offers 409 mm less outside turning radius than the Hyster H2.0FT. The Toyota 8FBC20U-COMP offers 92 mm less overall width than the Hyster H2.0FT.
Do the Hyster H2.0FT and Toyota 8FBC20U-COMP use the same fuel type?
No. Hyster H2.0FT: Diesel. Toyota 8FBC20U-COMP: Electric.