Linde X30 vs Toyota 8FBC32U
Comparing 2 electric forklifts on published specifications. 28 specifications are published for every model here.
Key differences
- Engine / Motor Power. Linde X30 offers 6.8 kW more engine / motor power than the next model in this comparison.
- Outside Turning Radius. Toyota 8FBC32U offers 394 mm less outside turning radius than the next model in this comparison.
- Overall Width. Toyota 8FBC32U offers 146 mm less overall width than the next model in this comparison.
- Maximum Lift Height. Toyota 8FBC32U offers 250 mm more maximum lift height than the next model in this comparison.
- Ground Clearance. Linde X30 offers 78 mm more ground clearance than the next model in this comparison.
- Drive Motor Power. Toyota 8FBC32U offers 5.6 kW more drive motor power than the next model in this comparison.
| Specification | Linde X30 | Toyota 8FBC32U |
|---|---|---|
| Capacity & Load | ||
| Rated Lift Capacity ↑ | 3,000 kg (6,614 lb) | 2,950 kg (6,504 lb) |
| Load Centre | 500 mm (19.7 in) | 600 mm (23.6 in) |
| Maximum Lift Height ↑ | 3,095 mm (10.2 ft) | 3,345 mm (11.0 ft) (leads on this specification) |
| Free Lift ↑ | 150 mm (5.9 in) (leads on this specification) | 135 mm (5.3 in) |
| Mast & Forks | ||
| Mast Type | Standard mast | Wide-view 2-stage (V) |
| Mast Height Lowered ↓ | 2,218 mm (7.3 ft) | 2,110 mm (6.9 ft) |
| Mast Height Extended | 3,850 mm (12.6 ft) | 4,565 mm (15.0 ft) |
| Mast Tilt Forward | 5deg | 6deg |
| Mast Tilt Backward | 8deg | 8deg |
| Fork Length | 1,000 mm (39.4 in) | 1,070 mm (42.1 in) |
| Fork Width | 100 mm (3.9 in) | 125 mm (4.9 in) |
| Fork Thickness | 45 mm (1.8 in) | 45 mm (1.8 in) |
| Fork Carriage Class | 3A | Not specified |
| Engine & Powertrain | ||
| Fuel Type | Electric | Electric |
| Power Source | Battery Electric | Battery Electric |
| Engine / Motor Power ↑ | 24.8 kW (33.3 hp) (leads on this specification) | 18.0 kW (24.1 hp) |
| Drive Motor Power ↑ | 12.4 kW (16.6 hp) | 18.0 kW (24.1 hp) (leads on this specification) |
| Lift Motor Power ↑ | 20.0 kW (26.8 hp) | 21.5 kW (28.8 hp) (leads on this specification) |
| Transmission | Synchronous reluctance motors, stepless digital control | AC drive, transistor inverter |
| Battery & Fuel | ||
| Battery Voltage | 90 V | 48 V |
| Battery Capacity ↑ | 670 Ah | 850 Ah (leads on this specification) |
| Battery Energy ↑ | 60.3 kWh | Not specified |
| Battery Type | Lithium-ion | Lead-acid |
| Dimensions | ||
| Overall Length (with forks) ↓ | 3,704 mm (12.2 ft) | Not specified |
| Length to Fork Face ↓ | 2,704 mm (8.9 ft) | 2,320 mm (7.6 ft) (leads on this specification) |
| Overall Width ↓ | 1,256 mm (49.4 in) | 1,110 mm (43.7 in) (leads on this specification) |
| Height to Overhead Guard ↓ | 2,225 mm (7.3 ft) | 2,235 mm (7.3 ft) |
| Wheelbase | 1,875 mm (73.8 in) | 1,390 mm (54.7 in) |
| Ground Clearance ↑ | 178 mm (7.0 in) (leads on this specification) | 100 mm (3.9 in) |
| Outside Turning Radius ↓ | 2,394 mm (7.9 ft) | 2,000 mm (6.6 ft) (leads on this specification) |
| Right-Angle Stacking Aisle (incl. load) ↓ | 4,043 mm (13.3 ft) | Not specified |
| Right-Angle Stacking Aisle (excl. load) ↓ | Not specified | 2,450 mm (8.0 ft) |
| Weights | ||
| Operating Weight | 5,121 kg (11,290 lb) | Not specified |
| Front Axle Load (laden) | 7,104 kg (15,662 lb) | Not specified |
| Rear Axle Load (laden) | 1,017 kg (2,242 lb) | Not specified |
| Performance | ||
| Travel Speed (laden) ↑ | 22.0 km/h (13.7 mph) (leads on this specification) | 19.2 km/h (11.9 mph) |
| Travel Speed (unladen) ↑ | 22.0 km/h (13.7 mph) (leads on this specification) | 18.5 km/h (11.5 mph) |
| Lift Speed (laden) ↑ | 570 mm/s (112.2 ft/min) (leads on this specification) | 453 mm/s (89.2 ft/min) |
| Lift Speed (unladen) ↑ | 580 mm/s (114.2 ft/min) | 595 mm/s (117.1 ft/min) |
| Lowering Speed (laden) | 580 mm/s (114.2 ft/min) | 500 mm/s (98.4 ft/min) |
| Gradeability (laden) ↑ | 18.3% (leads on this specification) | 17.0% |
| Drawbar Pull (laden) ↑ | 7,600 N (1,709 lbf) | Not specified |
| Tyres, Brakes & Chassis | ||
| Tyre Type | Solid Pneumatic | Cushion |
| Front Tyre Size | 250/75-12 (27 x 10-12) | 21 x 8 x 15 |
| Rear Tyre Size | 225/75-10 (23 x 9-10) | 16 x 6 x 10.5 |
| Wheels (front / rear) | 2x / 2 | 2x / 2 |
| Service Brake | Hydraulic / mechanical | Hydraulic |
| Operator Position | Seated | Seated |
How to read this comparison
- A highlighted value means that model leads on that specification, and only where a higher or lower figure is objectively better. Capacity and lift height are marked; wheelbase and tyre size are not, because neither direction is universally better.
- A value is only marked when every model in the comparison published that figure. We never mark a leader against missing data.
- We do not name an overall winner. Which machine is right depends on your aisles, your shift pattern and your energy prices, which no specification table knows.
- Capacity figures are only comparable at the same load centre. Check the load centre row before comparing capacities directly.
Frequently asked questions
Which has the higher lift capacity, the Linde X30 and Toyota 8FBC32U?
Linde X30: 3,000 kg. Toyota 8FBC32U: 2,950 kg.
What is the main difference between the Linde X30 and Toyota 8FBC32U?
Linde X30 offers 6.8 kW more engine / motor power than the next model in this comparison. Toyota 8FBC32U offers 394 mm less outside turning radius than the next model in this comparison. Toyota 8FBC32U offers 146 mm less overall width than the next model in this comparison.
People also compare
Other machines in this class
Compare something else
Build your own comparison with up to four models.
Start a new comparison