Hyster H3.5A vs Linde X30
Comparing 2 models on published specifications. 30 specifications are published for every model here.
Key differences
- Engine / Motor Power. Hyster H3.5A offers 19.2 kW more engine / motor power than the next model in this comparison.
- Maximum Lift Height. Hyster H3.5A offers 785 mm more maximum lift height than the next model in this comparison.
- Rated Lift Capacity. Hyster H3.5A offers 500 kg more rated lift capacity than the next model in this comparison.
- Overall Width. Hyster H3.5A offers 70 mm less overall width than the next model in this comparison.
- Free Lift. Linde X30 offers 100 mm more free lift than the next model in this comparison.
- Drawbar Pull (laden). Hyster H3.5A offers 11,421 N more drawbar pull (laden) than the next model in this comparison.
| Specification | Hyster H3.5A | Linde X30 |
|---|---|---|
| Capacity & Load | ||
| Rated Lift Capacity ↑ | 3,500 kg (7,716 lb) (leads on this specification) | 3,000 kg (6,614 lb) |
| Load Centre | 500 mm (19.7 in) | 500 mm (19.7 in) |
| Maximum Lift Height ↑ | 3,880 mm (12.7 ft) (leads on this specification) | 3,095 mm (10.2 ft) |
| Free Lift ↑ | 50 mm (2.0 in) | 150 mm (5.9 in) (leads on this specification) |
| Mast & Forks | ||
| Mast Type | 2-stage limited free lift | Standard mast |
| Mast Height Lowered ↓ | 2,692 mm (8.8 ft) | 2,218 mm (7.3 ft) (leads on this specification) |
| Mast Height Extended | 4,552 mm (14.9 ft) | 3,850 mm (12.6 ft) |
| Mast Tilt Forward | 6deg | 5deg |
| Mast Tilt Backward | 6deg | 8deg |
| Fork Length | 1,000 mm (39.4 in) | 1,000 mm (39.4 in) |
| Fork Width | 120 mm (4.7 in) | 100 mm (3.9 in) |
| Fork Thickness | 50 mm (2.0 in) | 45 mm (1.8 in) |
| Fork Carriage Class | III A | 3A |
| Engine & Powertrain | ||
| Fuel Type | Diesel | Electric |
| Power Source | Internal Combustion | Battery Electric |
| Engine Manufacturer | Yanmar | Not specified |
| Engine Model | 4TNV86CHT (2.1 L) | Not specified |
| Engine / Motor Power ↑ | 44.0 kW (59.0 hp) (leads on this specification) | 24.8 kW (33.3 hp) |
| Engine Displacement | 2,091 cc | Not specified |
| Cylinders | 4 | Not specified |
| Drive Motor Power ↑ | Not specified | 12.4 kW (16.6 hp) |
| Lift Motor Power ↑ | Not specified | 20.0 kW (26.8 hp) |
| Transmission | Electronic Powershift, 1-speed | Synchronous reluctance motors, stepless digital control |
| Battery & Fuel | ||
| Battery Voltage | Not specified | 90 V |
| Battery Capacity ↑ | Not specified | 670 Ah |
| Battery Energy ↑ | Not specified | 60.3 kWh |
| Battery Type | Not specified | Lithium-ion |
| Fuel Tank Capacity ↑ | 39.9 L (10.5 gal) | Not specified |
| Dimensions | ||
| Overall Length (with forks) ↓ | 3,813 mm (12.5 ft) | 3,704 mm (12.2 ft) |
| Length to Fork Face ↓ | 2,781 mm (9.1 ft) | 2,704 mm (8.9 ft) |
| Overall Width ↓ | 1,186 mm (46.7 in) (leads on this specification) | 1,256 mm (49.4 in) |
| Height to Overhead Guard ↓ | 2,182 mm (7.2 ft) | 2,225 mm (7.3 ft) |
| Wheelbase | 1,700 mm (66.9 in) | 1,875 mm (73.8 in) |
| Ground Clearance ↑ | 182 mm (7.2 in) | 178 mm (7.0 in) |
| Outside Turning Radius ↓ | 2,449 mm (8.0 ft) | 2,394 mm (7.9 ft) |
| Right-Angle Stacking Aisle (incl. load) ↓ | 4,144 mm (13.6 ft) | 4,043 mm (13.3 ft) |
| Weights | ||
| Operating Weight | 4,910 kg (10,825 lb) | 5,121 kg (11,290 lb) |
| Front Axle Load (laden) | 7,230 kg (15,939 lb) | 7,104 kg (15,662 lb) |
| Rear Axle Load (laden) | 1,180 kg (2,601 lb) | 1,017 kg (2,242 lb) |
| Performance | ||
| Travel Speed (laden) ↑ | 18.4 km/h (11.4 mph) | 22.0 km/h (13.7 mph) (leads on this specification) |
| Travel Speed (unladen) ↑ | 18.6 km/h (11.6 mph) | 22.0 km/h (13.7 mph) (leads on this specification) |
| Lift Speed (laden) ↑ | 560 mm/s (110.2 ft/min) | 570 mm/s (112.2 ft/min) |
| Lift Speed (unladen) ↑ | 610 mm/s (120.1 ft/min) | 580 mm/s (114.2 ft/min) |
| Lowering Speed (laden) | 580 mm/s (114.2 ft/min) | 580 mm/s (114.2 ft/min) |
| Gradeability (laden) ↑ | 24.0% (leads on this specification) | 18.3% |
| Drawbar Pull (laden) ↑ | 19,021 N (4,276 lbf) (leads on this specification) | 7,600 N (1,709 lbf) |
| Tyres, Brakes & Chassis | ||
| Tyre Type | Solid Pneumatic | Solid Pneumatic |
| Front Tyre Size | 28 x 9-15 | 250/75-12 (27 x 10-12) |
| Rear Tyre Size | 6.5 x 10 | 225/75-10 (23 x 9-10) |
| Wheels (front / rear) | 2x / 2 | 2x / 2 |
| Service Brake | Hydraulic, drum | Hydraulic / mechanical |
| Operator Position | Seated | Seated |
| General | ||
| Noise Level at Operator Ear ↓ | 79 dB(A) | Not specified |
| Warranty | 24 months / 4,000 hours (manufacturer standard) | Not specified |
How to read this comparison
- A highlighted value means that model leads on that specification, and only where a higher or lower figure is objectively better. Capacity and lift height are marked; wheelbase and tyre size are not, because neither direction is universally better.
- A value is only marked when every model in the comparison published that figure. We never mark a leader against missing data.
- We do not name an overall winner. Which machine is right depends on your aisles, your shift pattern and your energy prices, which no specification table knows.
- Capacity figures are only comparable at the same load centre. Check the load centre row before comparing capacities directly.
Frequently asked questions
Which has the higher lift capacity, the Hyster H3.5A and Linde X30?
Hyster H3.5A: 3,500 kg. Linde X30: 3,000 kg.
What is the main difference between the Hyster H3.5A and Linde X30?
Hyster H3.5A offers 19.2 kW more engine / motor power than the next model in this comparison. Hyster H3.5A offers 785 mm more maximum lift height than the next model in this comparison. Hyster H3.5A offers 500 kg more rated lift capacity than the next model in this comparison.
Do the Hyster H3.5A and Linde X30 use the same fuel type?
No. Hyster H3.5A: Diesel. Linde X30: Electric. Running costs are therefore not directly comparable without entering your own energy prices.
People also compare
Other machines in this class
Compare something else
Build your own comparison with up to four models.
Start a new comparison