Hyster H3.5FT vs Linde X30
Key differences
- Engine / Motor Power. The Hyster H3.5FT offers 18.2 kW more engine / motor power than the Linde X30.
- Rated Lift Capacity. The Hyster H3.5FT offers 500 kg more rated lift capacity than the Linde X30. Hyster H3.5FT: 3,500 kg (at 500 mm load centre) · Linde X30: 3,000 kg (at 500 mm load centre). These are published ratings at the same load centre. Check the manufacturer's load chart for the exact mast, lift height and attachment configuration before selecting a truck.
- Overall Width. The Hyster H3.5FT offers 70 mm less overall width than the Linde X30.
- Drawbar Pull (laden). The Hyster H3.5FT offers 9,850 N more drawbar pull (laden) than the Linde X30.
- Operating Weight. These differ: Hyster H3.5FT 4,799 kg, Linde X30 5,121 kg.
- Gradeability (laden). The Linde X30 offers 1.8% more gradeability (laden) than the Hyster H3.5FT.
On rated lift capacity, Hyster H3.5FT leads with the higher figure at 3,500 kg versus 3,000 kg for Linde X30. The measured gap is 500 kg, or 16.7% relative to the latter published value. Hyster H3.5FT: 3,500 kg (at 500 mm load centre) · Linde X30: 3,000 kg (at 500 mm load centre). These are published ratings at the same load centre. Check the manufacturer's load chart for the exact mast, lift height and attachment configuration before selecting a truck.
Linde X30 leads with the higher figure on maximum lift height: its published 3,095 mm compares with 3,055 mm for Hyster H3.5FT. That is an absolute difference of 40 mm (1.3% against the latter figure).
The travel speed (laden) figures separate Linde X30 and Hyster H3.5FT. Linde X30 leads with the higher figure with 22.0 km/h; Hyster H3.5FT records 20.0 km/h, a gap of 2.0 km/h or 10.0% of that second value.
On lift speed (laden), Hyster H3.5FT leads with the higher figure at 600 mm/s versus 570 mm/s for Linde X30. The measured gap is 30 mm/s, or 5.3% relative to the latter published value.
Linde X30 has the higher published figure on operating weight: its published 5,121 kg compares with 4,799 kg for Hyster H3.5FT. That is an absolute difference of 322 kg (6.7% against the latter figure).
The outside turning radius figures separate Hyster H3.5FT and Linde X30. Hyster H3.5FT leads with the lower figure with 2,380 mm; Linde X30 records 2,394 mm, a gap of 14 mm or 0.6% of that second value.
Highlighted values lead on that specification. An arrow indicates whether a higher or lower figure is preferred.
| Specification | Hyster H3.5FT | Linde X30 |
|---|---|---|
| Capacity & Load | ||
| Rated Lift Capacity | 3,500 kg (7,716 lb) (at 500 mm load centre) | 3,000 kg (6,614 lb) (at 500 mm load centre) |
| Load Centre | 500 mm (19.7 in) | 500 mm (19.7 in) |
| Maximum Lift Height | 3,055 mm (10.0 ft) | 3,095 mm (10.2 ft) |
| Free Lift | 140 mm (5.5 in) | 150 mm (5.9 in) |
| Mast & Forks | ||
| Mast Type | 2-stage limited free lift | Standard mast |
| Mast Height Lowered | 2,195 mm (7.2 ft) | 2,218 mm (7.3 ft) |
| Mast Height Extended | 3,805 mm (12.5 ft) | 3,850 mm (12.6 ft) |
| Mast Tilt Forward | 6deg | 5deg |
| Mast Tilt Backward | 5deg | 8deg |
| Fork Length | 1,000 mm (39.4 in) | 1,000 mm (39.4 in) |
| Fork Width | 120 mm (4.7 in) | 100 mm (3.9 in) |
| Fork Thickness | 50 mm (2.0 in) | 45 mm (1.8 in) |
| Fork Carriage Class | III A | 3A |
| Engine & Powertrain | ||
| Fuel Type | Diesel | Electric |
| Power Source | Internal Combustion | Battery Electric |
| Engine Manufacturer | Yanmar | Not specified |
| Engine Model | 4TNE98 (3.3 L) | Not specified |
| Engine / Motor Power | 43.0 kW (57.7 hp) | 24.8 kW (33.3 hp) |
| Engine Displacement | 3,319 cc | Not specified |
| Cylinders | 4 | Not specified |
| Drive Motor Power | Not specified | 12.4 kW (16.6 hp) |
| Lift Motor Power | Not specified | 20.0 kW (26.8 hp) |
| Transmission | Electronic Powershift, 1-speed | Synchronous reluctance motors, stepless digital control |
| Battery & Fuel | ||
| Battery Voltage | Not specified | 90 V |
| Battery Capacity | Not specified | 670 Ah |
| Battery Energy | Not specified | 60.3 kWh |
| Battery Type | Not specified | Lithium-ion |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 52.8 L (13.9 gal) | Not specified |
| Dimensions | ||
| Overall Length (with forks) | 3,734 mm (12.3 ft) | 3,704 mm (12.2 ft) |
| Length to Fork Face | 2,734 mm (9.0 ft) | 2,704 mm (8.9 ft) |
| Overall Width | 1,186 mm (46.7 in) | 1,256 mm (49.4 in) |
| Height to Overhead Guard | 2,185 mm (7.2 ft) | 2,225 mm (7.3 ft) |
| Wheelbase | 1,700 mm (66.9 in) | 1,875 mm (73.8 in) |
| Ground Clearance | 185 mm (7.3 in) | 178 mm (7.0 in) |
| Outside Turning Radius | 2,380 mm (7.8 ft) | 2,394 mm (7.9 ft) |
| Right-Angle Stacking Aisle (incl. load) | 4,063 mm (13.3 ft) | 4,043 mm (13.3 ft) |
| Working Aisle (VDI 4.34), 1000x1200 Crossways | 4,063 mm (13.3 ft) | 4,043 mm (13.3 ft) |
| Working Aisle (VDI 4.34), 800x1200 Lengthwise | 4,263 mm (14.0 ft) | 4,243 mm (13.9 ft) |
| Load Distance (x) | 483 mm (19.0 in) | 448 mm (17.6 in) |
| Internal Turning Radius (b13) | 647 mm (25.5 in) | 668 mm (26.3 in) |
| Weights | ||
| Operating Weight | 4,799 kg (10,580 lb) | 5,121 kg (11,290 lb) |
| Front Axle Load (laden) | 7,319 kg (16,136 lb) | 7,104 kg (15,662 lb) |
| Rear Axle Load (laden) | 980 kg (2,161 lb) | 1,017 kg (2,242 lb) |
| Performance | ||
| Travel Speed (laden) | 20.0 km/h (12.4 mph) | 22.0 km/h (13.7 mph) |
| Travel Speed (unladen) | 21.1 km/h (13.1 mph) | 22.0 km/h (13.7 mph) |
| Lift Speed (laden) | 600 mm/s (118.1 ft/min) | 570 mm/s (112.2 ft/min) |
| Lift Speed (unladen) | 600 mm/s (118.1 ft/min) | 580 mm/s (114.2 ft/min) |
| Lowering Speed (laden) | 530 mm/s (104.3 ft/min) | 580 mm/s (114.2 ft/min) |
| Gradeability (laden) | 16.5% | 18.3% |
| Drawbar Pull (laden) | 17,450 N (3,923 lbf) | 7,600 N (1,709 lbf) |
| Tyres, Brakes & Chassis | ||
| Tyre Type | Solid Pneumatic | Solid Pneumatic |
| Front Tyre Size | 28 x 9-15 | 250/75-12 (27 x 10-12) |
| Rear Tyre Size | 6.50 x 10 | 225/75-10 (23 x 9-10) |
| Wheels (front / rear) | 2x / 2 | 2x / 2 |
| Service Brake | Hydraulic, drum | Hydraulic / mechanical |
| Operator Position | Seated | Seated |
| General | ||
| Noise Level at Operator Ear | 79 dB(A) | Not specified |
| Warranty | 24 months / 4,000 hours (manufacturer standard) | Not specified |
What the numbers say
This is a cross-brand comparison: Hyster H3.5FT (Fortens FT), Linde X30 (X Series 1252).
Hyster H3.5FT: 3,500 kg (at 500 mm load centre); Linde X30: 3,000 kg (at 500 mm load centre). These are published ratings at the same load centre. Check the manufacturer's load chart for the exact mast, lift height and attachment configuration before selecting a truck.
The Hyster H3.5FT has the highest published rating at 3,500 kg, 17% more than the Linde X30 at 3,000 kg.
For racking, the Linde X30 reaches 3,095 mm while the Hyster H3.5FT tops out at 3,055 mm, a difference of 40 mm.
Per tonne of rated capacity the Hyster H3.5FT weighs 1,371 kg and the Linde X30 weighs 1,707 kg.
Frequently asked questions
How do the published lift capacity ratings of the Hyster H3.5FT and Linde X30 compare?
Hyster H3.5FT: 3,500 kg (at 500 mm load centre). Linde X30: 3,000 kg (at 500 mm load centre). These are published ratings at the same load centre. Check the manufacturer's load chart for the exact mast, lift height and attachment configuration before selecting a truck.
How do the lift heights of the Hyster H3.5FT and Linde X30 compare?
Hyster H3.5FT: 3,055 mm. Linde X30: 3,095 mm.
How do the turning radii of the Hyster H3.5FT and Linde X30 compare?
Hyster H3.5FT: 2,380 mm. Linde X30: 2,394 mm.
How do the operating weights of the Hyster H3.5FT and Linde X30 compare?
Hyster H3.5FT: 4,799 kg. Linde X30: 5,121 kg.
What is the main difference between the Hyster H3.5FT and Linde X30?
The Hyster H3.5FT offers 18.2 kW more engine / motor power than the Linde X30. The Hyster H3.5FT offers 500 kg more rated lift capacity than the Linde X30. Hyster H3.5FT: 3,500 kg (at 500 mm load centre) · Linde X30: 3,000 kg (at 500 mm load centre). These are published ratings at the same load centre. Check the manufacturer's load chart for the exact mast, lift height and attachment configuration before selecting a truck. The Hyster H3.5FT offers 70 mm less overall width than the Linde X30.
Do the Hyster H3.5FT and Linde X30 use the same fuel type?
No. Hyster H3.5FT: Diesel. Linde X30: Electric.