Hyster J3.5A vs Linde X30

Key differences

  • Engine / Motor Power. The Linde X30 offers 6.8 kW more engine / motor power than the Hyster J3.5A.
  • Rated Lift Capacity. The Hyster J3.5A offers 500 kg more rated lift capacity than the Linde X30. Hyster J3.5A: 3,500 kg (at 500 mm load centre) · Linde X30: 3,000 kg (at 500 mm load centre). These are published ratings at the same load centre. Check the manufacturer's load chart for the exact mast, lift height and attachment configuration before selecting a truck.
  • Outside Turning Radius. The Hyster J3.5A offers 225 mm less outside turning radius than the Linde X30.
  • Gradeability (laden). The Linde X30 offers 8.3% more gradeability (laden) than the Hyster J3.5A.
  • Lift Speed (laden). The Linde X30 offers 210 mm/s more lift speed (laden) than the Hyster J3.5A.
  • Free Lift. The Linde X30 offers 50 mm more free lift than the Hyster J3.5A.

On rated lift capacity, Hyster J3.5A leads with the higher figure at 3,500 kg versus 3,000 kg for Linde X30. The measured gap is 500 kg, or 16.7% relative to the latter published value. Hyster J3.5A: 3,500 kg (at 500 mm load centre) · Linde X30: 3,000 kg (at 500 mm load centre). These are published ratings at the same load centre. Check the manufacturer's load chart for the exact mast, lift height and attachment configuration before selecting a truck.

Hyster J3.5A leads with the higher figure on maximum lift height: its published 3,228 mm compares with 3,095 mm for Linde X30. That is an absolute difference of 133 mm (4.3% against the latter figure).

The travel speed (laden) figures separate Linde X30 and Hyster J3.5A. Linde X30 leads with the higher figure with 22.0 km/h; Hyster J3.5A records 16.0 km/h, a gap of 6.0 km/h or 37.5% of that second value.

On lift speed (laden), Linde X30 leads with the higher figure at 570 mm/s versus 360 mm/s for Hyster J3.5A. The measured gap is 210 mm/s, or 58.3% relative to the latter published value.

Hyster J3.5A has the higher published figure on operating weight: its published 5,746 kg compares with 5,121 kg for Linde X30. That is an absolute difference of 625 kg (12.2% against the latter figure).

The outside turning radius figures separate Hyster J3.5A and Linde X30. Hyster J3.5A leads with the lower figure with 2,169 mm; Linde X30 records 2,394 mm, a gap of 225 mm or 9.4% of that second value.

Highlighted values lead on that specification. An arrow indicates whether a higher or lower figure is preferred.

Specification Hyster J3.5A Linde X30
Capacity & Load
Rated Lift Capacity 3,500 kg (7,716 lb) (at 500 mm load centre) 3,000 kg (6,614 lb) (at 500 mm load centre)
Load Centre 500 mm (19.7 in) 500 mm (19.7 in)
Maximum Lift Height 3,228 mm (10.6 ft) 3,095 mm (10.2 ft)
Free Lift 100 mm (3.9 in) 150 mm (5.9 in)
Mast & Forks
Mast Type 2-stage limited free lift Standard mast
Mast Height Lowered 2,240 mm (7.3 ft) 2,218 mm (7.3 ft)
Mast Height Extended 4,498 mm (14.8 ft) 3,850 mm (12.6 ft)
Mast Tilt Forward 5deg 5deg
Mast Tilt Backward 5deg 8deg
Fork Length 1,000 mm (39.4 in) 1,000 mm (39.4 in)
Fork Width 120 mm (4.7 in) 100 mm (3.9 in)
Fork Thickness 50 mm (2.0 in) 45 mm (1.8 in)
Fork Carriage Class III A 3A
Engine & Powertrain
Fuel Type Electric Electric
Power Source Battery Electric Battery Electric
Engine / Motor Power 18.0 kW (24.1 hp) 24.8 kW (33.3 hp)
Drive Motor Power 9.0 kW (12.1 hp) 12.4 kW (16.6 hp)
Lift Motor Power 20.7 kW (27.8 hp) 20.0 kW (26.8 hp)
Transmission Induction drive control Synchronous reluctance motors, stepless digital control
Battery & Fuel
Battery Voltage 80 V 90 V
Battery Capacity 700 Ah 670 Ah
Battery Energy Not specified 60.3 kWh
Battery Type Lead-acid Lithium-ion
Minimum Battery Weight 1,770 kg (3,902 lb) Not specified
Dimensions
Overall Length (with forks) 3,591 mm (11.8 ft) 3,704 mm (12.2 ft)
Length to Fork Face 2,591 mm (8.5 ft) 2,704 mm (8.9 ft)
Overall Width 1,223 mm (48.1 in) 1,256 mm (49.4 in)
Height to Overhead Guard 2,193 mm (7.2 ft) 2,225 mm (7.3 ft)
Wheelbase 1,780 mm (70.1 in) 1,875 mm (73.8 in)
Ground Clearance 137 mm (5.4 in) 178 mm (7.0 in)
Outside Turning Radius 2,169 mm (7.1 ft) 2,394 mm (7.9 ft)
Right-Angle Stacking Aisle (incl. load) 3,871 mm (12.7 ft) 4,043 mm (13.3 ft)
Working Aisle (VDI 4.34), 1000x1200 Crossways 3,871 mm (12.7 ft) 4,043 mm (13.3 ft)
Working Aisle (VDI 4.34), 800x1200 Lengthwise 4,019 mm (13.2 ft) 4,243 mm (13.9 ft)
Load Distance (x) 434 mm (17.1 in) 448 mm (17.6 in)
Internal Turning Radius (b13) 134 mm (5.3 in) 668 mm (26.3 in)
Weights
Operating Weight 5,746 kg (12,668 lb) 5,121 kg (11,290 lb)
Front Axle Load (laden) 8,117 kg (17,895 lb) 7,104 kg (15,662 lb)
Rear Axle Load (laden) 1,130 kg (2,491 lb) 1,017 kg (2,242 lb)
Performance
Travel Speed (laden) 16.0 km/h (9.9 mph) 22.0 km/h (13.7 mph)
Travel Speed (unladen) 18.0 km/h (11.2 mph) 22.0 km/h (13.7 mph)
Lift Speed (laden) 360 mm/s (70.9 ft/min) 570 mm/s (112.2 ft/min)
Lift Speed (unladen) 560 mm/s (110.2 ft/min) 580 mm/s (114.2 ft/min)
Lowering Speed (laden) 640 mm/s (126.0 ft/min) 580 mm/s (114.2 ft/min)
Gradeability (laden) 10.0% 18.3%
Drawbar Pull (laden) 6,800 N (1,529 lbf) 7,600 N (1,709 lbf)
Tyres, Brakes & Chassis
Tyre Type Solid Pneumatic Solid Pneumatic
Front Tyre Size 23 x 10-12 250/75-12 (27 x 10-12)
Rear Tyre Size 18 x 7-8 225/75-10 (23 x 9-10)
Wheels (front / rear) 2x / 2 2x / 2
Service Brake Hydraulic Hydraulic / mechanical
Operator Position Seated Seated
General
Noise Level at Operator Ear 67 dB(A) Not specified
Warranty 24 months / 4,000 hours (manufacturer standard) Not specified

What the numbers say

This is a cross-brand comparison: Hyster J3.5A (J-A Series), Linde X30 (X Series 1252).

Hyster J3.5A: 3,500 kg (at 500 mm load centre); Linde X30: 3,000 kg (at 500 mm load centre). These are published ratings at the same load centre. Check the manufacturer's load chart for the exact mast, lift height and attachment configuration before selecting a truck.

The Hyster J3.5A has the highest published rating at 3,500 kg, 17% more than the Linde X30 at 3,000 kg.

For racking, the Hyster J3.5A reaches 3,228 mm while the Linde X30 tops out at 3,095 mm, a difference of 133 mm.

Per tonne of rated capacity the Hyster J3.5A weighs 1,642 kg and the Linde X30 weighs 1,707 kg.

By rated capacity among the electric forklifts in this database (highest first): Hyster J3.5A 1st of 19, Linde X30 3rd of 19.

Running cost

Frequently asked questions

How do the published lift capacity ratings of the Hyster J3.5A and Linde X30 compare?

Hyster J3.5A: 3,500 kg (at 500 mm load centre). Linde X30: 3,000 kg (at 500 mm load centre). These are published ratings at the same load centre. Check the manufacturer's load chart for the exact mast, lift height and attachment configuration before selecting a truck.

How do the lift heights of the Hyster J3.5A and Linde X30 compare?

Hyster J3.5A: 3,228 mm. Linde X30: 3,095 mm.

How do the turning radii of the Hyster J3.5A and Linde X30 compare?

Hyster J3.5A: 2,169 mm. Linde X30: 2,394 mm.

How do the operating weights of the Hyster J3.5A and Linde X30 compare?

Hyster J3.5A: 5,746 kg. Linde X30: 5,121 kg.

What is the main difference between the Hyster J3.5A and Linde X30?

The Linde X30 offers 6.8 kW more engine / motor power than the Hyster J3.5A. The Hyster J3.5A offers 500 kg more rated lift capacity than the Linde X30. Hyster J3.5A: 3,500 kg (at 500 mm load centre) · Linde X30: 3,000 kg (at 500 mm load centre). These are published ratings at the same load centre. Check the manufacturer's load chart for the exact mast, lift height and attachment configuration before selecting a truck. The Hyster J3.5A offers 225 mm less outside turning radius than the Linde X30.

Other machines in this class

Linde

X35

  • Capacity3,500 kg
  • FuelElectric

79%

Toyota

8FBC32U

  • Capacity2,950 kg
  • Lift height3,345 mm
  • FuelElectric

72%

Toyota

8FBCH32U

  • Capacity2,950 kg
  • Lift height3,345 mm
  • FuelElectric

70%

Toyota

8FBC30U

  • Capacity2,720 kg
  • Lift height3,345 mm
  • FuelElectric

72%

Linde

X25

  • Capacity2,500 kg
  • Lift height3,095 mm
  • FuelElectric

84%

Hyster

J3.0A

  • Capacity3,000 kg
  • Lift height3,228 mm
  • FuelElectric

86%

Compare something else

Start a new comparison