Linde X35 vs Toyota 8FBCH32U
Key differences
- Engine / Motor Power. The Linde X35 offers 6.8 kW more engine / motor power than the Toyota 8FBCH32U.
- Overall Width. The Toyota 8FBCH32U offers 246 mm less overall width than the Linde X35.
- Outside Turning Radius. The Toyota 8FBCH32U offers 304 mm less outside turning radius than the Linde X35.
- Ground Clearance. The Linde X35 offers 80 mm more ground clearance than the Toyota 8FBCH32U.
- Drive Motor Power. The Toyota 8FBCH32U offers 5.6 kW more drive motor power than the Linde X35.
- Battery Capacity. The Toyota 8FBCH32U offers 265 Ah more battery capacity than the Linde X35.
Linde X35: 3,500 kg (at 500 mm load centre) ยท Toyota 8FBCH32U: 2,950 kg (at 600 mm load centre). Load centres differ or are not specified; these capacity ratings are not directly comparable and do not establish a capacity winner. Check the manufacturer's load chart for the exact mast, lift height and attachment configuration before selecting a truck.
Linde X35 leads with the higher figure on lift speed (laden): its published 540 mm/s compares with 453 mm/s for Toyota 8FBCH32U. That is an absolute difference of 87 mm/s (19.2% against the latter figure).
The outside turning radius figures separate Toyota 8FBCH32U and Linde X35. Toyota 8FBCH32U leads with the lower figure with 2,090 mm; Linde X35 records 2,394 mm, a gap of 304 mm or 12.7% of that second value.
On battery capacity, Toyota 8FBCH32U leads with the higher figure at 935 Ah versus 670 Ah for Linde X35. The measured gap is 265 Ah, or 39.6% relative to the latter published value.
Linde X35 leads with the higher figure on engine / motor power: its published 24.8 kW compares with 18.0 kW for Toyota 8FBCH32U. That is an absolute difference of 6.8 kW (37.8% against the latter figure).
Highlighted values lead on that specification. An arrow indicates whether a higher or lower figure is preferred.
| Specification | Linde X35 | Toyota 8FBCH32U |
|---|---|---|
| Capacity & Load | ||
| Rated Lift Capacity | 3,500 kg (7,716 lb) (at 500 mm load centre) | 2,950 kg (6,504 lb) (at 600 mm load centre) |
| Load Centre | 500 mm (19.7 in) | 600 mm (23.6 in) |
| Maximum Lift Height | Not specified | 3,345 mm (11.0 ft) |
| Free Lift | 150 mm (5.9 in) | 135 mm (5.3 in) |
| Mast & Forks | ||
| Mast Type | Standard mast | Wide-view 2-stage (V) |
| Mast Height Lowered | 2,224 mm (7.3 ft) | 2,110 mm (6.9 ft) |
| Mast Height Extended | 3,856 mm (12.7 ft) | 4,565 mm (15.0 ft) |
| Mast Tilt Forward | 5deg | 6deg |
| Mast Tilt Backward | 8deg | 8deg |
| Fork Length | 1,000 mm (39.4 in) | 1,070 mm (42.1 in) |
| Fork Width | 120 mm (4.7 in) | 125 mm (4.9 in) |
| Fork Thickness | 50 mm (2.0 in) | 45 mm (1.8 in) |
| Fork Carriage Class | 3A | Not specified |
| Engine & Powertrain | ||
| Fuel Type | Electric | Electric |
| Power Source | Battery Electric | Battery Electric |
| Engine / Motor Power | 24.8 kW (33.3 hp) | 18.0 kW (24.1 hp) |
| Drive Motor Power | 12.4 kW (16.6 hp) | 18.0 kW (24.1 hp) |
| Lift Motor Power | 20.0 kW (26.8 hp) | 21.5 kW (28.8 hp) |
| Transmission | Synchronous reluctance motors, stepless digital control | AC drive, transistor inverter |
| Battery & Fuel | ||
| Battery Voltage | 90 V | 48 V |
| Battery Capacity | 670 Ah | 935 Ah |
| Battery Energy | 60.3 kWh | Not specified |
| Battery Type | Lithium-ion | Lead-acid |
| Dimensions | ||
| Overall Length (with forks) | 3,709 mm (12.2 ft) | Not specified |
| Length to Fork Face | 2,709 mm (8.9 ft) | 2,365 mm (7.8 ft) |
| Overall Width | 1,356 mm (53.4 in) | 1,110 mm (43.7 in) |
| Height to Overhead Guard | 2,225 mm (7.3 ft) | 2,235 mm (7.3 ft) |
| Wheelbase | 1,875 mm (73.8 in) | 1,480 mm (58.3 in) |
| Ground Clearance | 180 mm (7.1 in) | 100 mm (3.9 in) |
| Outside Turning Radius | 2,394 mm (7.9 ft) | 2,090 mm (6.9 ft) |
| Right-Angle Stacking Aisle (incl. load) | 4,048 mm (13.3 ft) | Not specified |
| Right-Angle Stacking Aisle (excl. load) | Not specified | 2,540 mm (8.3 ft) |
| Working Aisle (VDI 4.34), 1000x1200 Crossways | 4,048 mm (13.3 ft) | Not specified |
| Working Aisle (VDI 4.34), 800x1200 Lengthwise | 4,248 mm (13.9 ft) | Not specified |
| Load Distance (x) | 453 mm (17.8 in) | 450 mm (17.7 in) |
| Internal Turning Radius (b13) | 668 mm (26.3 in) | Not specified |
| Weights | ||
| Operating Weight | 5,536 kg (12,205 lb) | Not specified |
| Front Axle Load (laden) | 7,953 kg (17,533 lb) | Not specified |
| Rear Axle Load (laden) | 1,083 kg (2,388 lb) | Not specified |
| Performance | ||
| Travel Speed (laden) | 22.0 km/h (13.7 mph) | Not specified |
| Travel Speed (unladen) | 22.0 km/h (13.7 mph) | Not specified |
| Lift Speed (laden) | 540 mm/s (106.3 ft/min) | 453 mm/s (89.2 ft/min) |
| Lift Speed (unladen) | 580 mm/s (114.2 ft/min) | 595 mm/s (117.1 ft/min) |
| Lowering Speed (laden) | 580 mm/s (114.2 ft/min) | 500 mm/s (98.4 ft/min) |
| Gradeability (laden) | 17.6% | 17.0% |
| Drawbar Pull (laden) | 7,600 N (1,709 lbf) | Not specified |
| Tyres, Brakes & Chassis | ||
| Tyre Type | Solid Pneumatic | Cushion |
| Front Tyre Size | 355/45-15 (28 x 12.5-15) | 21 x 9 x 15 |
| Rear Tyre Size | 225/75-10 (23 x 9-10) | 16 x 6 x 10.5 |
| Wheels (front / rear) | 2x / 2 | 2x / 2 |
| Service Brake | Hydraulic / mechanical | Hydraulic |
| Operator Position | Seated | Seated |
What the numbers say
This is a cross-brand comparison: Linde X35 (X Series 1252), Toyota 8FBCH32U (Core Electric 8FBC).
Linde X35: 3,500 kg (at 500 mm load centre); Toyota 8FBCH32U: 2,950 kg (at 600 mm load centre). Load centres differ or are not specified; these capacity ratings are not directly comparable and do not establish a capacity winner. Check the manufacturer's load chart for the exact mast, lift height and attachment configuration before selecting a truck.
Frequently asked questions
How do the published lift capacity ratings of the Linde X35 and Toyota 8FBCH32U compare?
Linde X35: 3,500 kg (at 500 mm load centre). Toyota 8FBCH32U: 2,950 kg (at 600 mm load centre). Load centres differ or are not specified; these capacity ratings are not directly comparable and do not establish a capacity winner. Check the manufacturer's load chart for the exact mast, lift height and attachment configuration before selecting a truck.
How do the turning radii of the Linde X35 and Toyota 8FBCH32U compare?
Linde X35: 2,394 mm. Toyota 8FBCH32U: 2,090 mm.
What is the main difference between the Linde X35 and Toyota 8FBCH32U?
The Linde X35 offers 6.8 kW more engine / motor power than the Toyota 8FBCH32U. The Toyota 8FBCH32U offers 246 mm less overall width than the Linde X35. The Toyota 8FBCH32U offers 304 mm less outside turning radius than the Linde X35.