Hyster J3.5A vs Linde X35
Key differences
- Engine / Motor Power. The Linde X35 offers 6.8 kW more engine / motor power than the Hyster J3.5A.
- Overall Width. The Hyster J3.5A offers 133 mm less overall width than the Linde X35.
- Outside Turning Radius. The Hyster J3.5A offers 225 mm less outside turning radius than the Linde X35.
- Gradeability (laden). The Linde X35 offers 7.6% more gradeability (laden) than the Hyster J3.5A.
- Free Lift. The Linde X35 offers 50 mm more free lift than the Hyster J3.5A.
- Lift Speed (laden). The Linde X35 offers 180 mm/s more lift speed (laden) than the Hyster J3.5A.
On travel speed (laden), Linde X35 leads with the higher figure at 22.0 km/h versus 16.0 km/h for Hyster J3.5A. The measured gap is 6.0 km/h, or 37.5% relative to the latter published value.
Linde X35 leads with the higher figure on lift speed (laden): its published 540 mm/s compares with 360 mm/s for Hyster J3.5A. That is an absolute difference of 180 mm/s (50.0% against the latter figure).
The operating weight figures separate Hyster J3.5A and Linde X35. Hyster J3.5A has the higher published figure with 5,746 kg; Linde X35 records 5,536 kg, a gap of 210 kg or 3.8% of that second value.
On outside turning radius, Hyster J3.5A leads with the lower figure at 2,169 mm versus 2,394 mm for Linde X35. The measured gap is 225 mm, or 9.4% relative to the latter published value.
Hyster J3.5A leads with the higher figure on battery capacity: its published 700 Ah compares with 670 Ah for Linde X35. That is an absolute difference of 30 Ah (4.5% against the latter figure).
The engine / motor power figures separate Linde X35 and Hyster J3.5A. Linde X35 leads with the higher figure with 24.8 kW; Hyster J3.5A records 18.0 kW, a gap of 6.8 kW or 37.8% of that second value.
Highlighted values lead on that specification. An arrow indicates whether a higher or lower figure is preferred.
| Specification | Hyster J3.5A | Linde X35 |
|---|---|---|
| Capacity & Load | ||
| Rated Lift Capacity | 3,500 kg (7,716 lb) (at 500 mm load centre) | 3,500 kg (7,716 lb) (at 500 mm load centre) |
| Load Centre | 500 mm (19.7 in) | 500 mm (19.7 in) |
| Maximum Lift Height | 3,228 mm (10.6 ft) | Not specified |
| Free Lift | 100 mm (3.9 in) | 150 mm (5.9 in) |
| Mast & Forks | ||
| Mast Type | 2-stage limited free lift | Standard mast |
| Mast Height Lowered | 2,240 mm (7.3 ft) | 2,224 mm (7.3 ft) |
| Mast Height Extended | 4,498 mm (14.8 ft) | 3,856 mm (12.7 ft) |
| Mast Tilt Forward | 5deg | 5deg |
| Mast Tilt Backward | 5deg | 8deg |
| Fork Length | 1,000 mm (39.4 in) | 1,000 mm (39.4 in) |
| Fork Width | 120 mm (4.7 in) | 120 mm (4.7 in) |
| Fork Thickness | 50 mm (2.0 in) | 50 mm (2.0 in) |
| Fork Carriage Class | III A | 3A |
| Engine & Powertrain | ||
| Fuel Type | Electric | Electric |
| Power Source | Battery Electric | Battery Electric |
| Engine / Motor Power | 18.0 kW (24.1 hp) | 24.8 kW (33.3 hp) |
| Drive Motor Power | 9.0 kW (12.1 hp) | 12.4 kW (16.6 hp) |
| Lift Motor Power | 20.7 kW (27.8 hp) | 20.0 kW (26.8 hp) |
| Transmission | Induction drive control | Synchronous reluctance motors, stepless digital control |
| Battery & Fuel | ||
| Battery Voltage | 80 V | 90 V |
| Battery Capacity | 700 Ah | 670 Ah |
| Battery Energy | Not specified | 60.3 kWh |
| Battery Type | Lead-acid | Lithium-ion |
| Minimum Battery Weight | 1,770 kg (3,902 lb) | Not specified |
| Dimensions | ||
| Overall Length (with forks) | 3,591 mm (11.8 ft) | 3,709 mm (12.2 ft) |
| Length to Fork Face | 2,591 mm (8.5 ft) | 2,709 mm (8.9 ft) |
| Overall Width | 1,223 mm (48.1 in) | 1,356 mm (53.4 in) |
| Height to Overhead Guard | 2,193 mm (7.2 ft) | 2,225 mm (7.3 ft) |
| Wheelbase | 1,780 mm (70.1 in) | 1,875 mm (73.8 in) |
| Ground Clearance | 137 mm (5.4 in) | 180 mm (7.1 in) |
| Outside Turning Radius | 2,169 mm (7.1 ft) | 2,394 mm (7.9 ft) |
| Right-Angle Stacking Aisle (incl. load) | 3,871 mm (12.7 ft) | 4,048 mm (13.3 ft) |
| Working Aisle (VDI 4.34), 1000x1200 Crossways | 3,871 mm (12.7 ft) | 4,048 mm (13.3 ft) |
| Working Aisle (VDI 4.34), 800x1200 Lengthwise | 4,019 mm (13.2 ft) | 4,248 mm (13.9 ft) |
| Load Distance (x) | 434 mm (17.1 in) | 453 mm (17.8 in) |
| Internal Turning Radius (b13) | 134 mm (5.3 in) | 668 mm (26.3 in) |
| Weights | ||
| Operating Weight | 5,746 kg (12,668 lb) | 5,536 kg (12,205 lb) |
| Front Axle Load (laden) | 8,117 kg (17,895 lb) | 7,953 kg (17,533 lb) |
| Rear Axle Load (laden) | 1,130 kg (2,491 lb) | 1,083 kg (2,388 lb) |
| Performance | ||
| Travel Speed (laden) | 16.0 km/h (9.9 mph) | 22.0 km/h (13.7 mph) |
| Travel Speed (unladen) | 18.0 km/h (11.2 mph) | 22.0 km/h (13.7 mph) |
| Lift Speed (laden) | 360 mm/s (70.9 ft/min) | 540 mm/s (106.3 ft/min) |
| Lift Speed (unladen) | 560 mm/s (110.2 ft/min) | 580 mm/s (114.2 ft/min) |
| Lowering Speed (laden) | 640 mm/s (126.0 ft/min) | 580 mm/s (114.2 ft/min) |
| Gradeability (laden) | 10.0% | 17.6% |
| Drawbar Pull (laden) | 6,800 N (1,529 lbf) | 7,600 N (1,709 lbf) |
| Tyres, Brakes & Chassis | ||
| Tyre Type | Solid Pneumatic | Solid Pneumatic |
| Front Tyre Size | 23 x 10-12 | 355/45-15 (28 x 12.5-15) |
| Rear Tyre Size | 18 x 7-8 | 225/75-10 (23 x 9-10) |
| Wheels (front / rear) | 2x / 2 | 2x / 2 |
| Service Brake | Hydraulic | Hydraulic / mechanical |
| Operator Position | Seated | Seated |
| General | ||
| Noise Level at Operator Ear | 67 dB(A) | Not specified |
| Warranty | 24 months / 4,000 hours (manufacturer standard) | Not specified |
What the numbers say
This is a cross-brand comparison: Hyster J3.5A (J-A Series), Linde X35 (X Series 1252).
Hyster J3.5A: 3,500 kg (at 500 mm load centre); Linde X35: 3,500 kg (at 500 mm load centre). These are published ratings at the same load centre. Check the manufacturer's load chart for the exact mast, lift height and attachment configuration before selecting a truck.
The Hyster J3.5A and Linde X35 are rated at 3,500 kg, so capacity does not separate them.
Per tonne of rated capacity the Linde X35 weighs 1,582 kg and the Hyster J3.5A weighs 1,642 kg.
By rated capacity among the electric forklifts in this database (highest first): Hyster J3.5A 1st of 19, Linde X35 1st of 19.
Frequently asked questions
How do the turning radii of the Hyster J3.5A and Linde X35 compare?
Hyster J3.5A: 2,169 mm. Linde X35: 2,394 mm.
How do the operating weights of the Hyster J3.5A and Linde X35 compare?
Hyster J3.5A: 5,746 kg. Linde X35: 5,536 kg.
What is the main difference between the Hyster J3.5A and Linde X35?
The Linde X35 offers 6.8 kW more engine / motor power than the Hyster J3.5A. The Hyster J3.5A offers 133 mm less overall width than the Linde X35. The Hyster J3.5A offers 225 mm less outside turning radius than the Linde X35.