Hyster H3.0A vs Toyota 40-8FGU32

Comparing 2 models on published specifications. 30 specifications are published for every model here.

Key differences

  • Maximum Lift Height. Hyster H3.0A offers 535 mm more maximum lift height than the next model in this comparison.
  • Free Lift. Toyota 40-8FGU32 offers 85 mm more free lift than the next model in this comparison.
  • Fuel Tank Capacity. Toyota 40-8FGU32 offers 20.1 L more fuel tank capacity than the next model in this comparison.
  • Operating Weight. These differ: Hyster H3.0A 4,642 kg, Toyota 40-8FGU32 4,390 kg. Neither figure is better in itself - it depends on the application.
  • Mast Height Lowered. Toyota 40-8FGU32 offers 527 mm less mast height lowered than the next model in this comparison.
  • Gradeability (laden). Hyster H3.0A offers 4.0% more gradeability (laden) than the next model in this comparison.
Specification Hyster H3.0A Toyota 40-8FGU32
Capacity & Load
Rated Lift Capacity 3,000 kg (6,614 lb) 3,000 kg (6,614 lb)
Load Centre 500 mm (19.7 in) 600 mm (23.6 in)
Maximum Lift Height 3,880 mm (12.7 ft) (leads on this specification) 3,345 mm (11.0 ft)
Free Lift 50 mm (2.0 in) 135 mm (5.3 in) (leads on this specification)
Mast & Forks
Mast Type 2-stage limited free lift Wide-view 2-stage (V)
Mast Height Lowered 2,692 mm (8.8 ft) 2,165 mm (7.1 ft) (leads on this specification)
Mast Height Extended 4,552 mm (14.9 ft) 4,565 mm (15.0 ft)
Mast Tilt Forward 6deg 6deg
Mast Tilt Backward 6deg 11deg
Fork Length 1,000 mm (39.4 in) 1,070 mm (42.1 in)
Fork Width 120 mm (4.7 in) 125 mm (4.9 in)
Fork Thickness 50 mm (2.0 in) 45 mm (1.8 in)
Fork Carriage Class III A Not specified
Engine & Powertrain
Fuel Type Diesel Dual Fuel LPG/Petrol
Power Source Internal Combustion Internal Combustion
Engine Manufacturer Yanmar Kubota
Engine Model 4TNV86CHT (2.1 L) WG2503 (2.5 L)
Engine / Motor Power 44.0 kW (59.0 hp) 44.0 kW (59.0 hp)
Engine Displacement 2,091 cc 2,491 cc
Cylinders 4 4
Transmission Electronic Powershift, 1-speed Powershift, 1 forward / 1 reverse
Battery & Fuel
Fuel Tank Capacity 39.9 L (10.5 gal) 60.0 L (15.9 gal) (leads on this specification)
Dimensions
Overall Length (with forks) 3,746 mm (12.3 ft) Not specified
Length to Fork Face 2,731 mm (9.0 ft) 2,800 mm (9.2 ft)
Overall Width 1,186 mm (46.7 in) 1,240 mm (48.8 in)
Height to Overhead Guard 2,182 mm (7.2 ft) 2,170 mm (7.1 ft)
Wheelbase 1,700 mm (66.9 in) 1,700 mm (66.9 in)
Ground Clearance 182 mm (7.2 in) 185 mm (7.3 in)
Outside Turning Radius 2,374 mm (7.8 ft) 2,370 mm (7.8 ft)
Right-Angle Stacking Aisle (incl. load) 4,069 mm (13.3 ft) Not specified
Right-Angle Stacking Aisle (excl. load) Not specified 2,855 mm (9.4 ft)
Weights
Operating Weight 4,642 kg (10,234 lb) 4,390 kg (9,678 lb)
Front Axle Load (laden) 6,635 kg (14,628 lb) 6,700 kg (14,771 lb)
Rear Axle Load (laden) 1,007 kg (2,220 lb) 940 kg (2,072 lb)
Performance
Travel Speed (laden) 18.4 km/h (11.4 mph) 18.0 km/h (11.2 mph)
Travel Speed (unladen) 18.6 km/h (11.6 mph) 18.5 km/h (11.5 mph)
Lift Speed (laden) 560 mm/s (110.2 ft/min) (leads on this specification) 500 mm/s (98.4 ft/min)
Lift Speed (unladen) 610 mm/s (120.1 ft/min) (leads on this specification) 520 mm/s (102.4 ft/min)
Lowering Speed (laden) 580 mm/s (114.2 ft/min) 500 mm/s (98.4 ft/min)
Gradeability (laden) 26.0% (leads on this specification) 22.0%
Drawbar Pull (laden) 19,160 N (4,307 lbf) Not specified
Tyres, Brakes & Chassis
Tyre Type Solid Pneumatic Pneumatic
Front Tyre Size 28 x 9-15 28 x 9-15-14PR
Rear Tyre Size 6.5 x 10 6.50-10-10PR
Wheels (front / rear) 2x / 2 2x / 2
Service Brake Hydraulic, drum Hydraulic
Operator Position Seated Seated
General
Noise Level at Operator Ear 79 dB(A) Not specified
Warranty 24 months / 4,000 hours (manufacturer standard) Not specified

How to read this comparison

  • A highlighted value means that model leads on that specification, and only where a higher or lower figure is objectively better. Capacity and lift height are marked; wheelbase and tyre size are not, because neither direction is universally better.
  • A value is only marked when every model in the comparison published that figure. We never mark a leader against missing data.
  • We do not name an overall winner. Which machine is right depends on your aisles, your shift pattern and your energy prices, which no specification table knows.
  • Capacity figures are only comparable at the same load centre. Check the load centre row before comparing capacities directly.

Which one is cheaper to run?

The specification table cannot answer that on its own. Put your own hours and energy prices into these.

Frequently asked questions

Which has the higher lift capacity, the Hyster H3.0A and Toyota 40-8FGU32?

Hyster H3.0A: 3,000 kg. Toyota 40-8FGU32: 3,000 kg.

What is the main difference between the Hyster H3.0A and Toyota 40-8FGU32?

Hyster H3.0A offers 535 mm more maximum lift height than the next model in this comparison. Toyota 40-8FGU32 offers 85 mm more free lift than the next model in this comparison. Toyota 40-8FGU32 offers 20.1 L more fuel tank capacity than the next model in this comparison.

Do the Hyster H3.0A and Toyota 40-8FGU32 use the same fuel type?

No. Hyster H3.0A: Diesel. Toyota 40-8FGU32: Dual Fuel LPG/Petrol. Running costs are therefore not directly comparable without entering your own energy prices.

People also compare

Other machines in this class

Linde

X30

  • Capacity3,000 kg
  • Lift height3,095 mm
  • FuelElectric

84%

Yale

GLP30VX

  • Capacity3,000 kg
  • Lift height3,055 mm
  • FuelLPG

82%

Toyota

50-8FGU32

  • Capacity3,000 kg
  • Lift height3,345 mm
  • FuelLPG

77%

Toyota

8FBC32U

  • Capacity2,950 kg
  • Lift height3,345 mm
  • FuelElectric

72%

Toyota

8FBCH32U

  • Capacity2,950 kg
  • Lift height3,345 mm
  • FuelElectric

70%

Hyster

H3.0A LPG

  • Capacity3,000 kg
  • Lift height3,880 mm
  • FuelLPG

82%

Compare something else

Build your own comparison with up to four models.

Start a new comparison