Hyster H3.0A vs Linde X35
Key differences
- Engine / Motor Power. The Hyster H3.0A offers 19.2 kW more engine / motor power than the Linde X35.
- Rated Lift Capacity. The Linde X35 offers 500 kg more rated lift capacity than the Hyster H3.0A.
- Overall Width. The Hyster H3.0A offers 170 mm less overall width than the Linde X35.
- Free Lift. The Linde X35 offers 100 mm more free lift than the Hyster H3.0A.
- Drawbar Pull (laden). The Hyster H3.0A offers 11,560 N more drawbar pull (laden) than the Linde X35.
- Operating Weight. These differ: Hyster H3.0A 4,642 kg, Linde X35 5,536 kg.
On rated lift capacity, Linde X35 leads with the higher figure at 3,500 kg versus 3,000 kg for Hyster H3.0A. The measured gap is 500 kg, or 16.7% relative to the latter published value.
Linde X35 leads with the higher figure on travel speed (laden): its published 22.0 km/h compares with 18.4 km/h for Hyster H3.0A. That is an absolute difference of 3.6 km/h (19.6% against the latter figure).
The lift speed (laden) figures separate Hyster H3.0A and Linde X35. Hyster H3.0A leads with the higher figure with 560 mm/s; Linde X35 records 540 mm/s, a gap of 20 mm/s or 3.7% of that second value.
On operating weight, Linde X35 has the higher published figure at 5,536 kg versus 4,642 kg for Hyster H3.0A. The measured gap is 894 kg, or 19.3% relative to the latter published value.
Hyster H3.0A leads with the lower figure on outside turning radius: its published 2,374 mm compares with 2,394 mm for Linde X35. That is an absolute difference of 20 mm (0.8% against the latter figure).
The engine / motor power figures separate Hyster H3.0A and Linde X35. Hyster H3.0A leads with the higher figure with 44.0 kW; Linde X35 records 24.8 kW, a gap of 19.2 kW or 77.4% of that second value.
Highlighted values lead on that specification. An arrow indicates whether a higher or lower figure is preferred.
| Specification | Hyster H3.0A | Linde X35 |
|---|---|---|
| Capacity & Load | ||
| Rated Lift Capacity | 3,000 kg (6,614 lb) | 3,500 kg (7,716 lb) |
| Load Centre | 500 mm (19.7 in) | 500 mm (19.7 in) |
| Maximum Lift Height | 3,880 mm (12.7 ft) | Not specified |
| Free Lift | 50 mm (2.0 in) | 150 mm (5.9 in) |
| Mast & Forks | ||
| Mast Type | 2-stage limited free lift | Standard mast |
| Mast Height Lowered | 2,692 mm (8.8 ft) | 2,224 mm (7.3 ft) |
| Mast Height Extended | 4,552 mm (14.9 ft) | 3,856 mm (12.7 ft) |
| Mast Tilt Forward | 6deg | 5deg |
| Mast Tilt Backward | 6deg | 8deg |
| Fork Length | 1,000 mm (39.4 in) | 1,000 mm (39.4 in) |
| Fork Width | 120 mm (4.7 in) | 120 mm (4.7 in) |
| Fork Thickness | 50 mm (2.0 in) | 50 mm (2.0 in) |
| Fork Carriage Class | III A | 3A |
| Engine & Powertrain | ||
| Fuel Type | Diesel | Electric |
| Power Source | Internal Combustion | Battery Electric |
| Engine Manufacturer | Yanmar | Not specified |
| Engine Model | 4TNV86CHT (2.1 L) | Not specified |
| Engine / Motor Power | 44.0 kW (59.0 hp) | 24.8 kW (33.3 hp) |
| Engine Displacement | 2,091 cc | Not specified |
| Cylinders | 4 | Not specified |
| Drive Motor Power | Not specified | 12.4 kW (16.6 hp) |
| Lift Motor Power | Not specified | 20.0 kW (26.8 hp) |
| Transmission | Electronic Powershift, 1-speed | Synchronous reluctance motors, stepless digital control |
| Battery & Fuel | ||
| Battery Voltage | Not specified | 90 V |
| Battery Capacity | Not specified | 670 Ah |
| Battery Energy | Not specified | 60.3 kWh |
| Battery Type | Not specified | Lithium-ion |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 39.9 L (10.5 gal) | Not specified |
| Dimensions | ||
| Overall Length (with forks) | 3,746 mm (12.3 ft) | 3,709 mm (12.2 ft) |
| Length to Fork Face | 2,731 mm (9.0 ft) | 2,709 mm (8.9 ft) |
| Overall Width | 1,186 mm (46.7 in) | 1,356 mm (53.4 in) |
| Height to Overhead Guard | 2,182 mm (7.2 ft) | 2,225 mm (7.3 ft) |
| Wheelbase | 1,700 mm (66.9 in) | 1,875 mm (73.8 in) |
| Ground Clearance | 182 mm (7.2 in) | 180 mm (7.1 in) |
| Outside Turning Radius | 2,374 mm (7.8 ft) | 2,394 mm (7.9 ft) |
| Right-Angle Stacking Aisle (incl. load) | 4,069 mm (13.3 ft) | 4,048 mm (13.3 ft) |
| Working Aisle (VDI 4.34), 1000x1200 Crossways | 4,069 mm (13.3 ft) | 4,048 mm (13.3 ft) |
| Working Aisle (VDI 4.34), 800x1200 Lengthwise | 4,269 mm (14.0 ft) | 4,248 mm (13.9 ft) |
| Load Distance (x) | 495 mm (19.5 in) | 453 mm (17.8 in) |
| Internal Turning Radius (b13) | 660 mm (26.0 in) | 668 mm (26.3 in) |
| Weights | ||
| Operating Weight | 4,642 kg (10,234 lb) | 5,536 kg (12,205 lb) |
| Front Axle Load (laden) | 6,635 kg (14,628 lb) | 7,953 kg (17,533 lb) |
| Rear Axle Load (laden) | 1,007 kg (2,220 lb) | 1,083 kg (2,388 lb) |
| Performance | ||
| Travel Speed (laden) | 18.4 km/h (11.4 mph) | 22.0 km/h (13.7 mph) |
| Travel Speed (unladen) | 18.6 km/h (11.6 mph) | 22.0 km/h (13.7 mph) |
| Lift Speed (laden) | 560 mm/s (110.2 ft/min) | 540 mm/s (106.3 ft/min) |
| Lift Speed (unladen) | 610 mm/s (120.1 ft/min) | 580 mm/s (114.2 ft/min) |
| Lowering Speed (laden) | 580 mm/s (114.2 ft/min) | 580 mm/s (114.2 ft/min) |
| Gradeability (laden) | 26.0% | 17.6% |
| Drawbar Pull (laden) | 19,160 N (4,307 lbf) | 7,600 N (1,709 lbf) |
| Tyres, Brakes & Chassis | ||
| Tyre Type | Solid Pneumatic | Solid Pneumatic |
| Front Tyre Size | 28 x 9-15 | 355/45-15 (28 x 12.5-15) |
| Rear Tyre Size | 6.5 x 10 | 225/75-10 (23 x 9-10) |
| Wheels (front / rear) | 2x / 2 | 2x / 2 |
| Service Brake | Hydraulic, drum | Hydraulic / mechanical |
| Operator Position | Seated | Seated |
| General | ||
| Noise Level at Operator Ear | 79 dB(A) | Not specified |
| Warranty | 24 months / 4,000 hours (manufacturer standard) | Not specified |
What the numbers say
This is a cross-brand comparison: Hyster H3.0A (A Series), Linde X35 (X Series 1252).
The Linde X35 carries the most at 3,500 kg, 17% more than the Hyster H3.0A at 3,000 kg.
Per tonne of rated capacity the Hyster H3.0A weighs 1,547 kg and the Linde X35 weighs 1,582 kg.
Frequently asked questions
Which has the higher lift capacity, the Hyster H3.0A and Linde X35?
Hyster H3.0A: 3,000 kg. Linde X35: 3,500 kg.
How do the turning radii of the Hyster H3.0A and Linde X35 compare?
Hyster H3.0A: 2,374 mm. Linde X35: 2,394 mm.
How do the operating weights of the Hyster H3.0A and Linde X35 compare?
Hyster H3.0A: 4,642 kg. Linde X35: 5,536 kg.
What is the main difference between the Hyster H3.0A and Linde X35?
The Hyster H3.0A offers 19.2 kW more engine / motor power than the Linde X35. The Linde X35 offers 500 kg more rated lift capacity than the Hyster H3.0A. The Hyster H3.0A offers 170 mm less overall width than the Linde X35.
Do the Hyster H3.0A and Linde X35 use the same fuel type?
No. Hyster H3.0A: Diesel. Linde X35: Electric.