Hyster H2.0A vs Toyota 50-8FGU20
Comparing 2 models on published specifications. 30 specifications are published for every model here.
Key differences
- Maximum Lift Height. Hyster H2.0A offers 560 mm more maximum lift height than the next model in this comparison.
- Rated Lift Capacity. Hyster H2.0A offers 200 kg more rated lift capacity than the next model in this comparison.
- Free Lift. Toyota 50-8FGU20 offers 105 mm more free lift than the next model in this comparison.
- Fuel Tank Capacity. Toyota 50-8FGU20 offers 20.1 L more fuel tank capacity than the next model in this comparison.
- Operating Weight. These differ: Hyster H2.0A 3,613 kg, Toyota 50-8FGU20 3,210 kg. Neither figure is better in itself - it depends on the application.
- Mast Height Lowered. Toyota 50-8FGU20 offers 425 mm less mast height lowered than the next model in this comparison.
| Specification | Hyster H2.0A | Toyota 50-8FGU20 |
|---|---|---|
| Capacity & Load | ||
| Rated Lift Capacity ↑ | 2,000 kg (4,409 lb) (leads on this specification) | 1,800 kg (3,968 lb) |
| Load Centre | 500 mm (19.7 in) | 600 mm (23.6 in) |
| Maximum Lift Height ↑ | 3,900 mm (12.8 ft) (leads on this specification) | 3,340 mm (11.0 ft) |
| Free Lift ↑ | 50 mm (2.0 in) | 155 mm (6.1 in) (leads on this specification) |
| Mast & Forks | ||
| Mast Type | 2-stage limited free lift | Wide-view 2-stage (V) |
| Mast Height Lowered ↓ | 2,570 mm (8.4 ft) | 2,145 mm (7.0 ft) (leads on this specification) |
| Mast Height Extended | 4,500 mm (14.8 ft) | 4,560 mm (15.0 ft) |
| Mast Tilt Forward | 6deg | 6deg |
| Mast Tilt Backward | 6deg | 11deg |
| Fork Length | 1,000 mm (39.4 in) | 1,070 mm (42.1 in) |
| Fork Width | 100 mm (3.9 in) | 125 mm (4.9 in) |
| Fork Thickness | 40 mm (1.6 in) | 40 mm (1.6 in) |
| Fork Carriage Class | II A | Not specified |
| Engine & Powertrain | ||
| Fuel Type | Diesel | LPG |
| Power Source | Internal Combustion | Internal Combustion |
| Engine Manufacturer | Yanmar | Toyota |
| Engine Model | 4TNV86CT (2.1 L) | 4Y-US (2.2 L) |
| Engine / Motor Power ↑ | 36.6 kW (49.1 hp) | 38.0 kW (51.0 hp) |
| Engine Displacement | 2,091 cc | 2,237 cc |
| Cylinders | 4 | 4 |
| Transmission | Electronic Powershift, 1-speed | Powershift, 1 forward / 1 reverse |
| Battery & Fuel | ||
| Fuel Tank Capacity ↑ | 39.9 L (10.5 gal) | 60.0 L (15.9 gal) (leads on this specification) |
| Dimensions | ||
| Overall Length (with forks) ↓ | 3,534 mm (11.6 ft) | Not specified |
| Length to Fork Face ↓ | 2,516 mm (8.3 ft) | 2,575 mm (8.4 ft) |
| Overall Width ↓ | 1,160 mm (45.7 in) | 1,150 mm (45.3 in) |
| Height to Overhead Guard ↓ | 2,160 mm (7.1 ft) | 2,110 mm (6.9 ft) |
| Wheelbase | 1,650 mm (65.0 in) | 1,650 mm (65.0 in) |
| Ground Clearance ↑ | 160 mm (6.3 in) (leads on this specification) | 140 mm (5.5 in) |
| Outside Turning Radius ↓ | 2,191 mm (7.2 ft) | 2,150 mm (7.1 ft) |
| Right-Angle Stacking Aisle (incl. load) ↓ | 3,861 mm (12.7 ft) | Not specified |
| Right-Angle Stacking Aisle (excl. load) ↓ | Not specified | 2,620 mm (8.6 ft) |
| Weights | ||
| Operating Weight | 3,613 kg (7,965 lb) | 3,210 kg (7,077 lb) |
| Front Axle Load (laden) | 4,981 kg (10,981 lb) | 4,600 kg (10,141 lb) |
| Rear Axle Load (laden) | 632 kg (1,393 lb) | 610 kg (1,345 lb) |
| Performance | ||
| Travel Speed (laden) ↑ | 18.5 km/h (11.5 mph) (leads on this specification) | 17.5 km/h (10.9 mph) |
| Travel Speed (unladen) ↑ | 18.7 km/h (11.6 mph) | 18.0 km/h (11.2 mph) |
| Lift Speed (laden) ↑ | 610 mm/s (120.1 ft/min) | 600 mm/s (118.1 ft/min) |
| Lift Speed (unladen) ↑ | 650 mm/s (128.0 ft/min) | 640 mm/s (126.0 ft/min) |
| Lowering Speed (laden) | 580 mm/s (114.2 ft/min) | 500 mm/s (98.4 ft/min) |
| Gradeability (laden) ↑ | 30.0% | 33.0% (leads on this specification) |
| Drawbar Pull (laden) ↑ | 15,917 N (3,578 lbf) | Not specified |
| Tyres, Brakes & Chassis | ||
| Tyre Type | Solid Pneumatic | Pneumatic |
| Front Tyre Size | 7.00 x 12 | 7.00-12-12PR |
| Rear Tyre Size | 6.00 x 9 | 6.00-9-10PR |
| Wheels (front / rear) | 2x / 2 | 2x / 2 |
| Service Brake | Hydraulic, drum | Hydraulic |
| Operator Position | Seated | Seated |
| General | ||
| Noise Level at Operator Ear ↓ | 78 dB(A) | Not specified |
| Warranty | 24 months / 4,000 hours (manufacturer standard) | Not specified |
How to read this comparison
- A highlighted value means that model leads on that specification, and only where a higher or lower figure is objectively better. Capacity and lift height are marked; wheelbase and tyre size are not, because neither direction is universally better.
- A value is only marked when every model in the comparison published that figure. We never mark a leader against missing data.
- We do not name an overall winner. Which machine is right depends on your aisles, your shift pattern and your energy prices, which no specification table knows.
- Capacity figures are only comparable at the same load centre. Check the load centre row before comparing capacities directly.
Frequently asked questions
Which has the higher lift capacity, the Hyster H2.0A and Toyota 50-8FGU20?
Hyster H2.0A: 2,000 kg. Toyota 50-8FGU20: 1,800 kg.
What is the main difference between the Hyster H2.0A and Toyota 50-8FGU20?
Hyster H2.0A offers 560 mm more maximum lift height than the next model in this comparison. Hyster H2.0A offers 200 kg more rated lift capacity than the next model in this comparison. Toyota 50-8FGU20 offers 105 mm more free lift than the next model in this comparison.
Do the Hyster H2.0A and Toyota 50-8FGU20 use the same fuel type?
No. Hyster H2.0A: Diesel. Toyota 50-8FGU20: LPG. Running costs are therefore not directly comparable without entering your own energy prices.
People also compare
Other machines in this class
Compare something else
Build your own comparison with up to four models.
Start a new comparison