Hyster H4.0FT6 vs Toyota 50-8FGU32
Comparing 2 models on published specifications. 30 specifications are published for every model here.
Key differences
- Engine / Motor Power. Hyster H4.0FT6 offers 19.0 kW more engine / motor power than the next model in this comparison.
- Rated Lift Capacity. Hyster H4.0FT6 offers 1,000 kg more rated lift capacity than the next model in this comparison.
- Overall Width. Toyota 50-8FGU32 offers 162 mm less overall width than the next model in this comparison.
- Maximum Lift Height. Toyota 50-8FGU32 offers 345 mm more maximum lift height than the next model in this comparison.
- Outside Turning Radius. Toyota 50-8FGU32 offers 229 mm less outside turning radius than the next model in this comparison.
- Operating Weight. These differ: Hyster H4.0FT6 6,470 kg, Toyota 50-8FGU32 4,320 kg. Neither figure is better in itself - it depends on the application.
| Specification | Hyster H4.0FT6 | Toyota 50-8FGU32 |
|---|---|---|
| Capacity & Load | ||
| Rated Lift Capacity ↑ | 4,000 kg (8,818 lb) (leads on this specification) | 3,000 kg (6,614 lb) |
| Load Centre | 600 mm (23.6 in) | 600 mm (23.6 in) |
| Maximum Lift Height ↑ | 3,000 mm (9.8 ft) | 3,345 mm (11.0 ft) (leads on this specification) |
| Free Lift ↑ | 100 mm (3.9 in) | 135 mm (5.3 in) (leads on this specification) |
| Mast & Forks | ||
| Mast Type | 2-stage limited free lift | Wide-view 2-stage (V) |
| Mast Height Lowered ↓ | 2,171 mm (7.1 ft) | 2,165 mm (7.1 ft) |
| Mast Height Extended | 3,815 mm (12.5 ft) | 4,565 mm (15.0 ft) |
| Mast Tilt Forward | 6deg | 6deg |
| Mast Tilt Backward | 10deg | 11deg |
| Fork Length | 1,200 mm (47.2 in) | 1,070 mm (42.1 in) |
| Fork Width | 120 mm (4.7 in) | 125 mm (4.9 in) |
| Fork Thickness | 50 mm (2.0 in) | 45 mm (1.8 in) |
| Fork Carriage Class | III A | Not specified |
| Engine & Powertrain | ||
| Fuel Type | Diesel | LPG |
| Power Source | Internal Combustion | Internal Combustion |
| Engine Manufacturer | Kubota | Toyota |
| Engine Model | V3600 IDI-T (3.6 L) | 4Y-US (2.2 L) |
| Engine / Motor Power ↑ | 57.0 kW (76.4 hp) (leads on this specification) | 38.0 kW (51.0 hp) |
| Engine Displacement | 3,620 cc | 2,237 cc |
| Cylinders | 4 | 4 |
| Transmission | Electronic Powershift, 1-speed | Powershift, 1 forward / 1 reverse |
| Battery & Fuel | ||
| Fuel Tank Capacity ↑ | 79.0 L (20.9 gal) (leads on this specification) | 60.0 L (15.9 gal) |
| Dimensions | ||
| Overall Length (with forks) ↓ | 3,977 mm (13.0 ft) | Not specified |
| Length to Fork Face ↓ | 2,977 mm (9.8 ft) | 2,800 mm (9.2 ft) (leads on this specification) |
| Overall Width ↓ | 1,402 mm (55.2 in) | 1,240 mm (48.8 in) (leads on this specification) |
| Height to Overhead Guard ↓ | 2,258 mm (7.4 ft) | 2,170 mm (7.1 ft) |
| Wheelbase | 1,830 mm (72.0 in) | 1,700 mm (66.9 in) |
| Ground Clearance ↑ | 194 mm (7.6 in) | 185 mm (7.3 in) |
| Outside Turning Radius ↓ | 2,599 mm (8.5 ft) | 2,370 mm (7.8 ft) (leads on this specification) |
| Right-Angle Stacking Aisle (incl. load) ↓ | 4,522 mm (14.8 ft) | Not specified |
| Right-Angle Stacking Aisle (excl. load) ↓ | Not specified | 2,855 mm (9.4 ft) |
| Weights | ||
| Operating Weight | 6,470 kg (14,264 lb) | 4,320 kg (9,524 lb) |
| Front Axle Load (laden) | 9,133 kg (20,135 lb) | 6,670 kg (14,705 lb) |
| Rear Axle Load (laden) | 1,337 kg (2,948 lb) | 900 kg (1,984 lb) |
| Performance | ||
| Travel Speed (laden) ↑ | 17.9 km/h (11.1 mph) | 18.0 km/h (11.2 mph) |
| Travel Speed (unladen) ↑ | 18.8 km/h (11.7 mph) | 18.5 km/h (11.5 mph) |
| Lift Speed (laden) ↑ | 530 mm/s (104.3 ft/min) | 510 mm/s (100.4 ft/min) |
| Lift Speed (unladen) ↑ | 600 mm/s (118.1 ft/min) (leads on this specification) | 550 mm/s (108.3 ft/min) |
| Lowering Speed (laden) | 550 mm/s (108.3 ft/min) | 500 mm/s (98.4 ft/min) |
| Gradeability (laden) ↑ | 26.6% (leads on this specification) | 21.0% |
| Drawbar Pull (laden) ↑ | 25,933 N (5,830 lbf) | Not specified |
| Tyres, Brakes & Chassis | ||
| Tyre Type | Solid Pneumatic | Pneumatic |
| Front Tyre Size | 250 x 15 | 28 x 9-15-14PR |
| Rear Tyre Size | 7.00 x 12 | 6.50-10-10PR |
| Wheels (front / rear) | 2x / 2 | 2x / 2 |
| Service Brake | Hydraulic, oil-immersed | Hydraulic |
| Operator Position | Seated | Seated |
| General | ||
| Noise Level at Operator Ear ↓ | 81 dB(A) | Not specified |
How to read this comparison
- A highlighted value means that model leads on that specification, and only where a higher or lower figure is objectively better. Capacity and lift height are marked; wheelbase and tyre size are not, because neither direction is universally better.
- A value is only marked when every model in the comparison published that figure. We never mark a leader against missing data.
- We do not name an overall winner. Which machine is right depends on your aisles, your shift pattern and your energy prices, which no specification table knows.
- Capacity figures are only comparable at the same load centre. Check the load centre row before comparing capacities directly.
Frequently asked questions
Which has the higher lift capacity, the Hyster H4.0FT6 and Toyota 50-8FGU32?
Hyster H4.0FT6: 4,000 kg. Toyota 50-8FGU32: 3,000 kg.
What is the main difference between the Hyster H4.0FT6 and Toyota 50-8FGU32?
Hyster H4.0FT6 offers 19.0 kW more engine / motor power than the next model in this comparison. Hyster H4.0FT6 offers 1,000 kg more rated lift capacity than the next model in this comparison. Toyota 50-8FGU32 offers 162 mm less overall width than the next model in this comparison.
Do the Hyster H4.0FT6 and Toyota 50-8FGU32 use the same fuel type?
No. Hyster H4.0FT6: Diesel. Toyota 50-8FGU32: LPG. Running costs are therefore not directly comparable without entering your own energy prices.
People also compare
Other machines in this class
Compare something else
Build your own comparison with up to four models.
Start a new comparison