Hyster H3.5FT vs Toyota 40-8FGU32
Comparing 2 models on published specifications. 30 specifications are published for every model here.
Key differences
- Rated Lift Capacity. Hyster H3.5FT offers 500 kg more rated lift capacity than the next model in this comparison.
- Maximum Lift Height. Toyota 40-8FGU32 offers 290 mm more maximum lift height than the next model in this comparison.
- Operating Weight. These differ: Hyster H3.5FT 4,799 kg, Toyota 40-8FGU32 4,390 kg. Neither figure is better in itself - it depends on the application.
- Gradeability (laden). Toyota 40-8FGU32 offers 5.5% more gradeability (laden) than the next model in this comparison.
- Lift Speed (laden). Hyster H3.5FT offers 100 mm/s more lift speed (laden) than the next model in this comparison.
- Lift Speed (unladen). Hyster H3.5FT offers 80 mm/s more lift speed (unladen) than the next model in this comparison.
| Specification | Hyster H3.5FT | Toyota 40-8FGU32 |
|---|---|---|
| Capacity & Load | ||
| Rated Lift Capacity ↑ | 3,500 kg (7,716 lb) (leads on this specification) | 3,000 kg (6,614 lb) |
| Load Centre | 500 mm (19.7 in) | 600 mm (23.6 in) |
| Maximum Lift Height ↑ | 3,055 mm (10.0 ft) | 3,345 mm (11.0 ft) (leads on this specification) |
| Free Lift ↑ | 140 mm (5.5 in) | 135 mm (5.3 in) |
| Mast & Forks | ||
| Mast Type | 2-stage limited free lift | Wide-view 2-stage (V) |
| Mast Height Lowered ↓ | 2,195 mm (7.2 ft) | 2,165 mm (7.1 ft) |
| Mast Height Extended | 3,805 mm (12.5 ft) | 4,565 mm (15.0 ft) |
| Mast Tilt Forward | 6deg | 6deg |
| Mast Tilt Backward | 5deg | 11deg |
| Fork Length | 1,000 mm (39.4 in) | 1,070 mm (42.1 in) |
| Fork Width | 120 mm (4.7 in) | 125 mm (4.9 in) |
| Fork Thickness | 50 mm (2.0 in) | 45 mm (1.8 in) |
| Fork Carriage Class | III A | Not specified |
| Engine & Powertrain | ||
| Fuel Type | Diesel | Dual Fuel LPG/Petrol |
| Power Source | Internal Combustion | Internal Combustion |
| Engine Manufacturer | Yanmar | Kubota |
| Engine Model | 4TNE98 (3.3 L) | WG2503 (2.5 L) |
| Engine / Motor Power ↑ | 43.0 kW (57.7 hp) | 44.0 kW (59.0 hp) |
| Engine Displacement | 3,319 cc | 2,491 cc |
| Cylinders | 4 | 4 |
| Transmission | Electronic Powershift, 1-speed | Powershift, 1 forward / 1 reverse |
| Battery & Fuel | ||
| Fuel Tank Capacity ↑ | 52.8 L (13.9 gal) | 60.0 L (15.9 gal) (leads on this specification) |
| Dimensions | ||
| Overall Length (with forks) ↓ | 3,734 mm (12.3 ft) | Not specified |
| Length to Fork Face ↓ | 2,734 mm (9.0 ft) | 2,800 mm (9.2 ft) |
| Overall Width ↓ | 1,186 mm (46.7 in) | 1,240 mm (48.8 in) |
| Height to Overhead Guard ↓ | 2,185 mm (7.2 ft) | 2,170 mm (7.1 ft) |
| Wheelbase | 1,700 mm (66.9 in) | 1,700 mm (66.9 in) |
| Ground Clearance ↑ | 185 mm (7.3 in) | 185 mm (7.3 in) |
| Outside Turning Radius ↓ | 2,380 mm (7.8 ft) | 2,370 mm (7.8 ft) |
| Right-Angle Stacking Aisle (incl. load) ↓ | 4,063 mm (13.3 ft) | Not specified |
| Right-Angle Stacking Aisle (excl. load) ↓ | Not specified | 2,855 mm (9.4 ft) |
| Weights | ||
| Operating Weight | 4,799 kg (10,580 lb) | 4,390 kg (9,678 lb) |
| Front Axle Load (laden) | 7,319 kg (16,136 lb) | 6,700 kg (14,771 lb) |
| Rear Axle Load (laden) | 980 kg (2,161 lb) | 940 kg (2,072 lb) |
| Performance | ||
| Travel Speed (laden) ↑ | 20.0 km/h (12.4 mph) (leads on this specification) | 18.0 km/h (11.2 mph) |
| Travel Speed (unladen) ↑ | 21.1 km/h (13.1 mph) (leads on this specification) | 18.5 km/h (11.5 mph) |
| Lift Speed (laden) ↑ | 600 mm/s (118.1 ft/min) (leads on this specification) | 500 mm/s (98.4 ft/min) |
| Lift Speed (unladen) ↑ | 600 mm/s (118.1 ft/min) (leads on this specification) | 520 mm/s (102.4 ft/min) |
| Lowering Speed (laden) | 530 mm/s (104.3 ft/min) | 500 mm/s (98.4 ft/min) |
| Gradeability (laden) ↑ | 16.5% | 22.0% (leads on this specification) |
| Drawbar Pull (laden) ↑ | 17,450 N (3,923 lbf) | Not specified |
| Tyres, Brakes & Chassis | ||
| Tyre Type | Solid Pneumatic | Pneumatic |
| Front Tyre Size | 28 x 9-15 | 28 x 9-15-14PR |
| Rear Tyre Size | 6.50 x 10 | 6.50-10-10PR |
| Wheels (front / rear) | 2x / 2 | 2x / 2 |
| Service Brake | Hydraulic, drum | Hydraulic |
| Operator Position | Seated | Seated |
| General | ||
| Noise Level at Operator Ear ↓ | 79 dB(A) | Not specified |
| Warranty | 24 months / 4,000 hours (manufacturer standard) | Not specified |
How to read this comparison
- A highlighted value means that model leads on that specification, and only where a higher or lower figure is objectively better. Capacity and lift height are marked; wheelbase and tyre size are not, because neither direction is universally better.
- A value is only marked when every model in the comparison published that figure. We never mark a leader against missing data.
- We do not name an overall winner. Which machine is right depends on your aisles, your shift pattern and your energy prices, which no specification table knows.
- Capacity figures are only comparable at the same load centre. Check the load centre row before comparing capacities directly.
Frequently asked questions
Which has the higher lift capacity, the Hyster H3.5FT and Toyota 40-8FGU32?
Hyster H3.5FT: 3,500 kg. Toyota 40-8FGU32: 3,000 kg.
What is the main difference between the Hyster H3.5FT and Toyota 40-8FGU32?
Hyster H3.5FT offers 500 kg more rated lift capacity than the next model in this comparison. Toyota 40-8FGU32 offers 290 mm more maximum lift height than the next model in this comparison. These differ: Hyster H3.5FT 4,799 kg, Toyota 40-8FGU32 4,390 kg. Neither figure is better in itself - it depends on the application.
Do the Hyster H3.5FT and Toyota 40-8FGU32 use the same fuel type?
No. Hyster H3.5FT: Diesel. Toyota 40-8FGU32: Dual Fuel LPG/Petrol. Running costs are therefore not directly comparable without entering your own energy prices.
People also compare
Other machines in this class
Compare something else
Build your own comparison with up to four models.
Start a new comparison