Hyster H3.5A vs Toyota 50-8FGU32
Comparing 2 models on published specifications. 30 specifications are published for every model here.
Key differences
- Rated Lift Capacity. Hyster H3.5A offers 500 kg more rated lift capacity than the next model in this comparison.
- Maximum Lift Height. Hyster H3.5A offers 535 mm more maximum lift height than the next model in this comparison.
- Engine / Motor Power. Hyster H3.5A offers 6.0 kW more engine / motor power than the next model in this comparison.
- Free Lift. Toyota 50-8FGU32 offers 85 mm more free lift than the next model in this comparison.
- Operating Weight. These differ: Hyster H3.5A 4,910 kg, Toyota 50-8FGU32 4,320 kg. Neither figure is better in itself - it depends on the application.
- Fuel Tank Capacity. Toyota 50-8FGU32 offers 20.1 L more fuel tank capacity than the next model in this comparison.
| Specification | Hyster H3.5A | Toyota 50-8FGU32 |
|---|---|---|
| Capacity & Load | ||
| Rated Lift Capacity ↑ | 3,500 kg (7,716 lb) (leads on this specification) | 3,000 kg (6,614 lb) |
| Load Centre | 500 mm (19.7 in) | 600 mm (23.6 in) |
| Maximum Lift Height ↑ | 3,880 mm (12.7 ft) (leads on this specification) | 3,345 mm (11.0 ft) |
| Free Lift ↑ | 50 mm (2.0 in) | 135 mm (5.3 in) (leads on this specification) |
| Mast & Forks | ||
| Mast Type | 2-stage limited free lift | Wide-view 2-stage (V) |
| Mast Height Lowered ↓ | 2,692 mm (8.8 ft) | 2,165 mm (7.1 ft) (leads on this specification) |
| Mast Height Extended | 4,552 mm (14.9 ft) | 4,565 mm (15.0 ft) |
| Mast Tilt Forward | 6deg | 6deg |
| Mast Tilt Backward | 6deg | 11deg |
| Fork Length | 1,000 mm (39.4 in) | 1,070 mm (42.1 in) |
| Fork Width | 120 mm (4.7 in) | 125 mm (4.9 in) |
| Fork Thickness | 50 mm (2.0 in) | 45 mm (1.8 in) |
| Fork Carriage Class | III A | Not specified |
| Engine & Powertrain | ||
| Fuel Type | Diesel | LPG |
| Power Source | Internal Combustion | Internal Combustion |
| Engine Manufacturer | Yanmar | Toyota |
| Engine Model | 4TNV86CHT (2.1 L) | 4Y-US (2.2 L) |
| Engine / Motor Power ↑ | 44.0 kW (59.0 hp) (leads on this specification) | 38.0 kW (51.0 hp) |
| Engine Displacement | 2,091 cc | 2,237 cc |
| Cylinders | 4 | 4 |
| Transmission | Electronic Powershift, 1-speed | Powershift, 1 forward / 1 reverse |
| Battery & Fuel | ||
| Fuel Tank Capacity ↑ | 39.9 L (10.5 gal) | 60.0 L (15.9 gal) (leads on this specification) |
| Dimensions | ||
| Overall Length (with forks) ↓ | 3,813 mm (12.5 ft) | Not specified |
| Length to Fork Face ↓ | 2,781 mm (9.1 ft) | 2,800 mm (9.2 ft) |
| Overall Width ↓ | 1,186 mm (46.7 in) | 1,240 mm (48.8 in) |
| Height to Overhead Guard ↓ | 2,182 mm (7.2 ft) | 2,170 mm (7.1 ft) |
| Wheelbase | 1,700 mm (66.9 in) | 1,700 mm (66.9 in) |
| Ground Clearance ↑ | 182 mm (7.2 in) | 185 mm (7.3 in) |
| Outside Turning Radius ↓ | 2,449 mm (8.0 ft) | 2,370 mm (7.8 ft) |
| Right-Angle Stacking Aisle (incl. load) ↓ | 4,144 mm (13.6 ft) | Not specified |
| Right-Angle Stacking Aisle (excl. load) ↓ | Not specified | 2,855 mm (9.4 ft) |
| Weights | ||
| Operating Weight | 4,910 kg (10,825 lb) | 4,320 kg (9,524 lb) |
| Front Axle Load (laden) | 7,230 kg (15,939 lb) | 6,670 kg (14,705 lb) |
| Rear Axle Load (laden) | 1,180 kg (2,601 lb) | 900 kg (1,984 lb) |
| Performance | ||
| Travel Speed (laden) ↑ | 18.4 km/h (11.4 mph) | 18.0 km/h (11.2 mph) |
| Travel Speed (unladen) ↑ | 18.6 km/h (11.6 mph) | 18.5 km/h (11.5 mph) |
| Lift Speed (laden) ↑ | 560 mm/s (110.2 ft/min) (leads on this specification) | 510 mm/s (100.4 ft/min) |
| Lift Speed (unladen) ↑ | 610 mm/s (120.1 ft/min) (leads on this specification) | 550 mm/s (108.3 ft/min) |
| Lowering Speed (laden) | 580 mm/s (114.2 ft/min) | 500 mm/s (98.4 ft/min) |
| Gradeability (laden) ↑ | 24.0% (leads on this specification) | 21.0% |
| Drawbar Pull (laden) ↑ | 19,021 N (4,276 lbf) | Not specified |
| Tyres, Brakes & Chassis | ||
| Tyre Type | Solid Pneumatic | Pneumatic |
| Front Tyre Size | 28 x 9-15 | 28 x 9-15-14PR |
| Rear Tyre Size | 6.5 x 10 | 6.50-10-10PR |
| Wheels (front / rear) | 2x / 2 | 2x / 2 |
| Service Brake | Hydraulic, drum | Hydraulic |
| Operator Position | Seated | Seated |
| General | ||
| Noise Level at Operator Ear ↓ | 79 dB(A) | Not specified |
| Warranty | 24 months / 4,000 hours (manufacturer standard) | Not specified |
How to read this comparison
- A highlighted value means that model leads on that specification, and only where a higher or lower figure is objectively better. Capacity and lift height are marked; wheelbase and tyre size are not, because neither direction is universally better.
- A value is only marked when every model in the comparison published that figure. We never mark a leader against missing data.
- We do not name an overall winner. Which machine is right depends on your aisles, your shift pattern and your energy prices, which no specification table knows.
- Capacity figures are only comparable at the same load centre. Check the load centre row before comparing capacities directly.
Frequently asked questions
Which has the higher lift capacity, the Hyster H3.5A and Toyota 50-8FGU32?
Hyster H3.5A: 3,500 kg. Toyota 50-8FGU32: 3,000 kg.
What is the main difference between the Hyster H3.5A and Toyota 50-8FGU32?
Hyster H3.5A offers 500 kg more rated lift capacity than the next model in this comparison. Hyster H3.5A offers 535 mm more maximum lift height than the next model in this comparison. Hyster H3.5A offers 6.0 kW more engine / motor power than the next model in this comparison.
Do the Hyster H3.5A and Toyota 50-8FGU32 use the same fuel type?
No. Hyster H3.5A: Diesel. Toyota 50-8FGU32: LPG. Running costs are therefore not directly comparable without entering your own energy prices.
People also compare
Other machines in this class
Compare something else
Build your own comparison with up to four models.
Start a new comparison