Hyster R2.5 vs Linde X25

Key differences

  • Maximum Lift Height. The Hyster R2.5 offers 1,555 mm more maximum lift height than the Linde X25.
  • Outside Turning Radius. The Hyster R2.5 offers 441 mm less outside turning radius than the Linde X25.
  • Overall Width. The Linde X25 offers 89 mm less overall width than the Hyster R2.5.
  • Free Lift. The Hyster R2.5 offers 1,432 mm more free lift than the Linde X25.
  • Gradeability (laden). The Linde X25 offers 10.5% more gradeability (laden) than the Hyster R2.5.
  • Ground Clearance. The Linde X25 offers 88 mm more ground clearance than the Hyster R2.5.

On maximum lift height, Hyster R2.5 leads with the higher figure at 4,650 mm versus 3,095 mm for Linde X25. The measured gap is 1,555 mm, or 50.2% relative to the latter published value.

Linde X25 leads with the higher figure on travel speed (laden): its published 22.0 km/h compares with 11.0 km/h for Hyster R2.5. That is an absolute difference of 11.0 km/h (100.0% against the latter figure).

The lift speed (laden) figures separate Linde X25 and Hyster R2.5. Linde X25 leads with the higher figure with 570 mm/s; Hyster R2.5 records 300 mm/s, a gap of 270 mm/s or 90.0% of that second value.

On operating weight, Linde X25 has the higher published figure at 4,837 kg versus 4,230 kg for Hyster R2.5. The measured gap is 607 kg, or 14.3% relative to the latter published value.

Hyster R2.5 leads with the lower figure on outside turning radius: its published 1,911 mm compares with 2,352 mm for Linde X25. That is an absolute difference of 441 mm (18.8% against the latter figure).

The battery capacity figures separate Hyster R2.5 and Linde X25. Hyster R2.5 leads with the higher figure with 840 Ah; Linde X25 records 670 Ah, a gap of 170 Ah or 25.4% of that second value.

Highlighted values lead on that specification. An arrow indicates whether a higher or lower figure is preferred.

Specification Hyster R2.5 Linde X25
Capacity & Load
Rated Lift Capacity 2,500 kg (5,512 lb) (at 600 mm load centre) 2,500 kg (5,512 lb) (at 500 mm load centre)
Load Centre 600 mm (23.6 in) 500 mm (19.7 in)
Maximum Lift Height 4,650 mm (15.3 ft) 3,095 mm (10.2 ft)
Free Lift 1,582 mm (62.3 in) 150 mm (5.9 in)
Mast & Forks
Mast Type 3-stage full free lift Standard mast
Mast Height Lowered 2,195 mm (7.2 ft) 2,220 mm (7.3 ft)
Mast Height Extended 5,263 mm (17.3 ft) 3,852 mm (12.6 ft)
Mast Tilt Forward 2deg 5deg
Mast Tilt Backward 4deg 8deg
Fork Length 1,150 mm (45.3 in) 1,000 mm (39.4 in)
Fork Width 120 mm (4.7 in) 100 mm (3.9 in)
Fork Thickness 45 mm (1.8 in) 45 mm (1.8 in)
Fork Carriage Class II A 2A
Engine & Powertrain
Fuel Type Electric Electric
Power Source Electric (battery) Battery Electric
Engine / Motor Power Not specified 24.8 kW (33.3 hp)
Drive Motor Power 9.6 kW (12.9 hp) 12.4 kW (16.6 hp)
Lift Motor Power 14.0 kW (18.8 hp) 20.0 kW (26.8 hp)
Transmission Not specified Synchronous reluctance motors, stepless digital control
Battery & Fuel
Battery Voltage 48 V 90 V
Battery Capacity 840 Ah 670 Ah
Battery Energy Not specified 60.3 kWh
Battery Type Lead-acid Lithium-ion
Minimum Battery Weight 1,306 kg (2,879 lb) Not specified
Dimensions
Overall Length (with forks) 2,615 mm (8.6 ft) 3,671 mm (12.0 ft)
Length to Fork Face 1,465 mm (57.7 in) 2,671 mm (8.8 ft)
Overall Width 1,345 mm (53.0 in) 1,256 mm (49.4 in)
Height to Overhead Guard 2,175 mm (7.1 ft) 2,225 mm (7.3 ft)
Wheelbase 1,650 mm (65.0 in) 1,853 mm (73.0 in)
Ground Clearance 85 mm (3.3 in) 173 mm (6.8 in)
Outside Turning Radius 1,911 mm (75.2 in) 2,352 mm (7.7 ft)
Right-Angle Stacking Aisle (incl. load) 2,949 mm (9.7 ft) 4,008 mm (13.1 ft)
Working Aisle (VDI 4.34), 1000x1200 Crossways 2,949 mm (9.7 ft) 4,008 mm (13.1 ft)
Working Aisle (VDI 4.34), 800x1200 Lengthwise 2,992 mm (9.8 ft) 4,208 mm (13.8 ft)
Load Distance (x) 416 mm (16.4 in) 455 mm (17.9 in)
Internal Turning Radius (b13) Not specified 655 mm (25.8 in)
Weights
Operating Weight 4,230 kg (9,326 lb) 4,837 kg (10,664 lb)
Front Axle Load (laden) 2,306 kg (5,084 lb) 6,315 kg (13,922 lb)
Rear Axle Load (laden) 4,424 kg (9,753 lb) 1,022 kg (2,253 lb)
Performance
Travel Speed (laden) 11.0 km/h (6.8 mph) 22.0 km/h (13.7 mph)
Travel Speed (unladen) 11.0 km/h (6.8 mph) 22.0 km/h (13.7 mph)
Lift Speed (laden) 300 mm/s (59.1 ft/min) 570 mm/s (112.2 ft/min)
Lift Speed (unladen) 640 mm/s (126.0 ft/min) 580 mm/s (114.2 ft/min)
Lowering Speed (laden) 550 mm/s (108.3 ft/min) 580 mm/s (114.2 ft/min)
Gradeability (laden) 10.0% 20.5%
Drawbar Pull (laden) Not specified 7,600 N (1,709 lbf)
Tyres, Brakes & Chassis
Tyre Type Vulkollan Solid Pneumatic
Front Tyre Size 343 x 140 250/75-12 (27 x 10-12)
Rear Tyre Size 285 x 140 6.50-10
Wheels (front / rear) 1x / 2 2x / 2
Service Brake Electric Hydraulic / mechanical
Operator Position Seated Seated
General
Noise Level at Operator Ear 70 dB(A) Not specified
Warranty 24 months / 4,000 hours (manufacturer standard) Not specified

What the numbers say

This is a cross-brand comparison: Hyster R2.5 (R Series (D435)), Linde X25 (X Series 1252).

Hyster R2.5: 2,500 kg (at 600 mm load centre); Linde X25: 2,500 kg (at 500 mm load centre). Load centres differ or are not specified; these capacity ratings are not directly comparable and do not establish a capacity winner. Check the manufacturer's load chart for the exact mast, lift height and attachment configuration before selecting a truck.

For racking, the Hyster R2.5 reaches 4,650 mm while the Linde X25 tops out at 3,095 mm, a difference of 1,555 mm.

Running cost

Frequently asked questions

How do the lift heights of the Hyster R2.5 and Linde X25 compare?

Hyster R2.5: 4,650 mm. Linde X25: 3,095 mm.

How do the turning radii of the Hyster R2.5 and Linde X25 compare?

Hyster R2.5: 1,911 mm. Linde X25: 2,352 mm.

How do the operating weights of the Hyster R2.5 and Linde X25 compare?

Hyster R2.5: 4,230 kg. Linde X25: 4,837 kg.

What is the main difference between the Hyster R2.5 and Linde X25?

The Hyster R2.5 offers 1,555 mm more maximum lift height than the Linde X25. The Hyster R2.5 offers 441 mm less outside turning radius than the Linde X25. The Linde X25 offers 89 mm less overall width than the Hyster R2.5.

People also compare

Other machines in this class

Toyota

8FBC28U

  • Capacity2,490 kg
  • Lift height3,345 mm
  • FuelElectric

72%

Toyota

8FBC30U

  • Capacity2,720 kg
  • Lift height3,345 mm
  • FuelElectric

72%

Toyota

8FBC25U

  • Capacity2,270 kg
  • Lift height3,340 mm
  • FuelElectric

72%

Toyota

8FBC25U-COMP

  • Capacity2,270 kg
  • Lift height3,340 mm
  • FuelElectric

72%

Toyota

8FBCH25U

  • Capacity2,270 kg
  • Lift height3,340 mm
  • FuelElectric

72%

Hyster

J2.5A

  • Capacity2,500 kg
  • Lift height3,371 mm
  • FuelElectric

78%

Compare something else

Start a new comparison