Hyster J2.2A vs Toyota 40-8FGU25
Comparing 2 models on published specifications. 27 specifications are published for every model here.
Key differences
- Engine / Motor Power. Toyota 40-8FGU25 offers 26.0 kW more engine / motor power than the next model in this comparison.
- Outside Turning Radius. Hyster J2.2A offers 262 mm less outside turning radius than the next model in this comparison.
- Rated Lift Capacity. Toyota 40-8FGU25 offers 250 kg more rated lift capacity than the next model in this comparison.
- Gradeability (laden). Toyota 40-8FGU25 offers 13.0% more gradeability (laden) than the next model in this comparison.
- Operating Weight. These differ: Hyster J2.2A 4,531 kg, Toyota 40-8FGU25 3,640 kg. Neither figure is better in itself - it depends on the application.
- Free Lift. Toyota 40-8FGU25 offers 55 mm more free lift than the next model in this comparison.
| Specification | Hyster J2.2A | Toyota 40-8FGU25 |
|---|---|---|
| Capacity & Load | ||
| Rated Lift Capacity ↑ | 2,000 kg (4,409 lb) | 2,250 kg (4,960 lb) (leads on this specification) |
| Load Centre | 500 mm (19.7 in) | 600 mm (23.6 in) |
| Maximum Lift Height ↑ | 3,371 mm (11.1 ft) | 3,340 mm (11.0 ft) |
| Free Lift ↑ | 100 mm (3.9 in) | 155 mm (6.1 in) (leads on this specification) |
| Mast & Forks | ||
| Mast Type | 2-stage limited free lift | Wide-view 2-stage (V) |
| Mast Height Lowered ↓ | 2,140 mm (7.0 ft) | 2,145 mm (7.0 ft) |
| Mast Height Extended | 4,480 mm (14.7 ft) | 4,560 mm (15.0 ft) |
| Mast Tilt Forward | 5deg | 6deg |
| Mast Tilt Backward | 5deg | 11deg |
| Fork Length | 1,000 mm (39.4 in) | 1,070 mm (42.1 in) |
| Fork Width | 100 mm (3.9 in) | 125 mm (4.9 in) |
| Fork Thickness | 40 mm (1.6 in) | 40 mm (1.6 in) |
| Fork Carriage Class | II A | Not specified |
| Engine & Powertrain | ||
| Fuel Type | Electric | Dual Fuel LPG/Petrol |
| Power Source | Battery Electric | Internal Combustion |
| Engine Manufacturer | Not specified | Kubota |
| Engine Model | Not specified | WG2503 (2.5 L) |
| Engine / Motor Power ↑ | 18.0 kW (24.1 hp) | 44.0 kW (59.0 hp) (leads on this specification) |
| Engine Displacement | Not specified | 2,491 cc |
| Cylinders | Not specified | 4 |
| Drive Motor Power ↑ | 9.0 kW (12.1 hp) | Not specified |
| Lift Motor Power ↑ | 20.7 kW (27.8 hp) | Not specified |
| Transmission | Induction drive control | Powershift, 1 forward / 1 reverse |
| Battery & Fuel | ||
| Battery Voltage | 80 V | Not specified |
| Battery Capacity ↑ | 560 Ah | Not specified |
| Battery Type | Lead-acid | Not specified |
| Minimum Battery Weight | 1,480 kg (3,263 lb) | Not specified |
| Fuel Tank Capacity ↑ | Not specified | 60.0 L (15.9 gal) |
| Dimensions | ||
| Overall Length (with forks) ↓ | 3,371 mm (11.1 ft) | Not specified |
| Length to Fork Face ↓ | 2,371 mm (7.8 ft) (leads on this specification) | 2,640 mm (8.7 ft) |
| Overall Width ↓ | 1,185 mm (46.7 in) | 1,150 mm (45.3 in) |
| Height to Overhead Guard ↓ | 2,193 mm (7.2 ft) | 2,110 mm (6.9 ft) |
| Wheelbase | 1,636 mm (64.4 in) | 1,650 mm (65.0 in) |
| Ground Clearance ↑ | 137 mm (5.4 in) | 140 mm (5.5 in) |
| Outside Turning Radius ↓ | 1,958 mm (77.1 in) (leads on this specification) | 2,220 mm (7.3 ft) |
| Right-Angle Stacking Aisle (incl. load) ↓ | 3,654 mm (12.0 ft) | Not specified |
| Right-Angle Stacking Aisle (excl. load) ↓ | Not specified | 2,690 mm (8.8 ft) |
| Weights | ||
| Operating Weight | 4,531 kg (9,989 lb) | 3,640 kg (8,025 lb) |
| Front Axle Load (laden) | 5,558 kg (12,253 lb) | 5,360 kg (11,817 lb) |
| Rear Axle Load (laden) | 973 kg (2,145 lb) | 770 kg (1,698 lb) |
| Performance | ||
| Travel Speed (laden) ↑ | 18.0 km/h (11.2 mph) | 17.5 km/h (10.9 mph) |
| Travel Speed (unladen) ↑ | 18.0 km/h (11.2 mph) | 18.0 km/h (11.2 mph) |
| Lift Speed (laden) ↑ | 570 mm/s (112.2 ft/min) | 600 mm/s (118.1 ft/min) (leads on this specification) |
| Lift Speed (unladen) ↑ | 630 mm/s (124.0 ft/min) | 630 mm/s (124.0 ft/min) |
| Lowering Speed (laden) | 680 mm/s (133.9 ft/min) | 500 mm/s (98.4 ft/min) |
| Gradeability (laden) ↑ | 13.0% | 26.0% (leads on this specification) |
| Drawbar Pull (laden) ↑ | 7,720 N (1,736 lbf) | Not specified |
| Tyres, Brakes & Chassis | ||
| Tyre Type | Solid Pneumatic | Pneumatic |
| Front Tyre Size | 23 x 9-10 | 7.00-12-12PR |
| Rear Tyre Size | 18 x 7-8 | 6.00-9-10PR |
| Wheels (front / rear) | 2x / 2 | 2x / 2 |
| Service Brake | Hydraulic | Hydraulic |
| Operator Position | Seated | Seated |
| General | ||
| Noise Level at Operator Ear ↓ | 67 dB(A) | Not specified |
| Warranty | 24 months / 4,000 hours (manufacturer standard) | Not specified |
How to read this comparison
- A highlighted value means that model leads on that specification, and only where a higher or lower figure is objectively better. Capacity and lift height are marked; wheelbase and tyre size are not, because neither direction is universally better.
- A value is only marked when every model in the comparison published that figure. We never mark a leader against missing data.
- We do not name an overall winner. Which machine is right depends on your aisles, your shift pattern and your energy prices, which no specification table knows.
- Capacity figures are only comparable at the same load centre. Check the load centre row before comparing capacities directly.
Frequently asked questions
Which has the higher lift capacity, the Hyster J2.2A and Toyota 40-8FGU25?
Hyster J2.2A: 2,000 kg. Toyota 40-8FGU25: 2,250 kg.
What is the main difference between the Hyster J2.2A and Toyota 40-8FGU25?
Toyota 40-8FGU25 offers 26.0 kW more engine / motor power than the next model in this comparison. Hyster J2.2A offers 262 mm less outside turning radius than the next model in this comparison. Toyota 40-8FGU25 offers 250 kg more rated lift capacity than the next model in this comparison.
Do the Hyster J2.2A and Toyota 40-8FGU25 use the same fuel type?
No. Hyster J2.2A: Electric. Toyota 40-8FGU25: Dual Fuel LPG/Petrol. Running costs are therefore not directly comparable without entering your own energy prices.
People also compare
Other machines in this class
Compare something else
Build your own comparison with up to four models.
Start a new comparison