Hyster H3.5FT vs Yale GLP35VX
Comparing 2 models on published specifications. 34 specifications are published for every model here.
Key differences
- Lift Speed (laden). Hyster H3.5FT offers 70 mm/s more lift speed (laden) than the next model in this comparison.
- Gradeability (laden). Hyster H3.5FT offers 1.5% more gradeability (laden) than the next model in this comparison.
- Lift Speed (unladen). Hyster H3.5FT offers 50 mm/s more lift speed (unladen) than the next model in this comparison.
- Engine Displacement. These differ: Hyster H3.5FT 3,319 cc, Yale GLP35VX 2,351 cc. Neither figure is better in itself - it depends on the application.
| Specification | Hyster H3.5FT | Yale GLP35VX |
|---|---|---|
| Capacity & Load | ||
| Rated Lift Capacity ↑ | 3,500 kg (7,716 lb) | 3,500 kg (7,716 lb) |
| Load Centre | 500 mm (19.7 in) | 500 mm (19.7 in) |
| Maximum Lift Height ↑ | 3,055 mm (10.0 ft) | 3,055 mm (10.0 ft) |
| Free Lift ↑ | 140 mm (5.5 in) | 140 mm (5.5 in) |
| Mast & Forks | ||
| Mast Type | 2-stage limited free lift | 2-stage limited free lift |
| Mast Height Lowered ↓ | 2,195 mm (7.2 ft) | 2,195 mm (7.2 ft) |
| Mast Height Extended | 3,805 mm (12.5 ft) | 3,809 mm (12.5 ft) |
| Mast Tilt Forward | 6deg | 6deg |
| Mast Tilt Backward | 5deg | 5deg |
| Fork Length | 1,000 mm (39.4 in) | 1,000 mm (39.4 in) |
| Fork Width | 120 mm (4.7 in) | 120 mm (4.7 in) |
| Fork Thickness | 50 mm (2.0 in) | 50 mm (2.0 in) |
| Fork Carriage Class | III A | III A |
| Engine & Powertrain | ||
| Fuel Type | Diesel | LPG |
| Power Source | Internal Combustion | Internal Combustion |
| Engine Manufacturer | Yanmar | PSI |
| Engine Model | 4TNE98 (3.3 L) | 2.4 L LPG |
| Engine / Motor Power ↑ | 43.0 kW (57.7 hp) | 44.0 kW (59.0 hp) |
| Engine Displacement | 3,319 cc | 2,351 cc |
| Cylinders | 4 | 4 |
| Transmission | Electronic Powershift, 1-speed | Electronic Powershift |
| Battery & Fuel | ||
| Fuel Tank Capacity ↑ | 52.8 L (13.9 gal) | 52.8 L (13.9 gal) |
| Dimensions | ||
| Overall Length (with forks) ↓ | 3,734 mm (12.3 ft) | 3,734 mm (12.3 ft) |
| Length to Fork Face ↓ | 2,734 mm (9.0 ft) | 2,734 mm (9.0 ft) |
| Overall Width ↓ | 1,186 mm (46.7 in) | 1,186 mm (46.7 in) |
| Height to Overhead Guard ↓ | 2,185 mm (7.2 ft) | 2,185 mm (7.2 ft) |
| Wheelbase | 1,700 mm (66.9 in) | 1,700 mm (66.9 in) |
| Ground Clearance ↑ | 185 mm (7.3 in) | 185 mm (7.3 in) |
| Outside Turning Radius ↓ | 2,380 mm (7.8 ft) | 2,380 mm (7.8 ft) |
| Right-Angle Stacking Aisle (incl. load) ↓ | 4,063 mm (13.3 ft) | 4,058 mm (13.3 ft) |
| Weights | ||
| Operating Weight | 4,799 kg (10,580 lb) | 4,799 kg (10,580 lb) |
| Front Axle Load (laden) | 7,319 kg (16,136 lb) | 7,319 kg (16,136 lb) |
| Rear Axle Load (laden) | 980 kg (2,161 lb) | 980 kg (2,161 lb) |
| Performance | ||
| Travel Speed (laden) ↑ | 20.0 km/h (12.4 mph) | 19.1 km/h (11.9 mph) |
| Travel Speed (unladen) ↑ | 21.1 km/h (13.1 mph) | 20.3 km/h (12.6 mph) |
| Lift Speed (laden) ↑ | 600 mm/s (118.1 ft/min) (leads on this specification) | 530 mm/s (104.3 ft/min) |
| Lift Speed (unladen) ↑ | 600 mm/s (118.1 ft/min) (leads on this specification) | 550 mm/s (108.3 ft/min) |
| Lowering Speed (laden) | 530 mm/s (104.3 ft/min) | 530 mm/s (104.3 ft/min) |
| Gradeability (laden) ↑ | 16.5% (leads on this specification) | 15.0% |
| Drawbar Pull (laden) ↑ | 17,450 N (3,923 lbf) | 16,905 N (3,800 lbf) |
| Tyres, Brakes & Chassis | ||
| Tyre Type | Solid Pneumatic | Solid Pneumatic |
| Front Tyre Size | 28 x 9-15 | 28 x 9-15 |
| Rear Tyre Size | 6.50 x 10 | 6.50 x 10 |
| Wheels (front / rear) | 2x / 2 | 2x / 2 |
| Service Brake | Hydraulic, drum | Hydraulic, drum |
| Operator Position | Seated | Seated |
| General | ||
| Noise Level at Operator Ear ↓ | 79 dB(A) | 77 dB(A) |
| Warranty | 24 months / 4,000 hours (manufacturer standard) | Not specified |
How to read this comparison
- A highlighted value means that model leads on that specification, and only where a higher or lower figure is objectively better. Capacity and lift height are marked; wheelbase and tyre size are not, because neither direction is universally better.
- A value is only marked when every model in the comparison published that figure. We never mark a leader against missing data.
- We do not name an overall winner. Which machine is right depends on your aisles, your shift pattern and your energy prices, which no specification table knows.
- Capacity figures are only comparable at the same load centre. Check the load centre row before comparing capacities directly.
Frequently asked questions
Which has the higher lift capacity, the Hyster H3.5FT and Yale GLP35VX?
Hyster H3.5FT: 3,500 kg. Yale GLP35VX: 3,500 kg.
What is the main difference between the Hyster H3.5FT and Yale GLP35VX?
Hyster H3.5FT offers 70 mm/s more lift speed (laden) than the next model in this comparison. Hyster H3.5FT offers 1.5% more gradeability (laden) than the next model in this comparison. Hyster H3.5FT offers 50 mm/s more lift speed (unladen) than the next model in this comparison.
Do the Hyster H3.5FT and Yale GLP35VX use the same fuel type?
No. Hyster H3.5FT: Diesel. Yale GLP35VX: LPG. Running costs are therefore not directly comparable without entering your own energy prices.
People also compare
Other machines in this class
Compare something else
Build your own comparison with up to four models.
Start a new comparison