Hyster R2.0 vs Toyota 8FBCH25U
Key differences
- Maximum Lift Height. The Hyster R2.0 offers 1,310 mm more maximum lift height than the Toyota 8FBCH25U.
- Overall Width. The Toyota 8FBCH25U offers 200 mm less overall width than the Hyster R2.0.
- Rated Lift Capacity. The Toyota 8FBCH25U offers 270 kg more rated lift capacity than the Hyster R2.0. Hyster R2.0: 2,000 kg (at 600 mm load centre) · Toyota 8FBCH25U: 2,270 kg (at 600 mm load centre). These are published ratings at the same load centre. Check the manufacturer's load chart for the exact mast, lift height and attachment configuration before selecting a truck.
- Outside Turning Radius. The Hyster R2.0 offers 173 mm less outside turning radius than the Toyota 8FBCH25U.
- Free Lift. The Hyster R2.0 offers 1,427 mm more free lift than the Toyota 8FBCH25U.
- Travel Speed (laden). The Toyota 8FBCH25U offers 8.5 km/h more travel speed (laden) than the Hyster R2.0.
On rated lift capacity, Toyota 8FBCH25U leads with the higher figure at 2,270 kg versus 2,000 kg for Hyster R2.0. The measured gap is 270 kg, or 13.5% relative to the latter published value. Hyster R2.0: 2,000 kg (at 600 mm load centre) · Toyota 8FBCH25U: 2,270 kg (at 600 mm load centre). These are published ratings at the same load centre. Check the manufacturer's load chart for the exact mast, lift height and attachment configuration before selecting a truck.
Hyster R2.0 leads with the higher figure on maximum lift height: its published 4,650 mm compares with 3,340 mm for Toyota 8FBCH25U. That is an absolute difference of 1,310 mm (39.2% against the latter figure).
The travel speed (laden) figures separate Toyota 8FBCH25U and Hyster R2.0. Toyota 8FBCH25U leads with the higher figure with 19.5 km/h; Hyster R2.0 records 11.0 km/h, a gap of 8.5 km/h or 77.3% of that second value.
On lift speed (laden), Toyota 8FBCH25U leads with the higher figure at 520 mm/s versus 370 mm/s for Hyster R2.0. The measured gap is 150 mm/s, or 40.5% relative to the latter published value.
Hyster R2.0 leads with the lower figure on outside turning radius: its published 1,767 mm compares with 1,940 mm for Toyota 8FBCH25U. That is an absolute difference of 173 mm (8.9% against the latter figure).
The battery capacity figures separate Toyota 8FBCH25U and Hyster R2.0. Toyota 8FBCH25U leads with the higher figure with 850 Ah; Hyster R2.0 records 700 Ah, a gap of 150 Ah or 21.4% of that second value.
Highlighted values lead on that specification. An arrow indicates whether a higher or lower figure is preferred.
| Specification | Hyster R2.0 | Toyota 8FBCH25U |
|---|---|---|
| Capacity & Load | ||
| Rated Lift Capacity | 2,000 kg (4,409 lb) (at 600 mm load centre) | 2,270 kg (5,004 lb) (at 600 mm load centre) |
| Load Centre | 600 mm (23.6 in) | 600 mm (23.6 in) |
| Maximum Lift Height | 4,650 mm (15.3 ft) | 3,340 mm (11.0 ft) |
| Free Lift | 1,582 mm (62.3 in) | 155 mm (6.1 in) |
| Mast & Forks | ||
| Mast Type | 3-stage full free lift | Wide-view 2-stage (V) |
| Mast Height Lowered | 2,195 mm (7.2 ft) | 2,110 mm (6.9 ft) |
| Mast Height Extended | 5,263 mm (17.3 ft) | 4,560 mm (15.0 ft) |
| Mast Tilt Forward | 2deg | 6deg |
| Mast Tilt Backward | 4deg | 8deg |
| Fork Length | 1,150 mm (45.3 in) | 1,070 mm (42.1 in) |
| Fork Width | 120 mm (4.7 in) | 125 mm (4.9 in) |
| Fork Thickness | 40 mm (1.6 in) | 40 mm (1.6 in) |
| Fork Carriage Class | II A | Not specified |
| Engine & Powertrain | ||
| Fuel Type | Electric | Electric |
| Power Source | Electric (battery) | Battery Electric |
| Engine / Motor Power | Not specified | 14.8 kW (19.8 hp) |
| Drive Motor Power | 9.6 kW (12.9 hp) | 14.8 kW (19.8 hp) |
| Lift Motor Power | 14.0 kW (18.8 hp) | 21.5 kW (28.8 hp) |
| Transmission | Not specified | AC drive, transistor inverter |
| Battery & Fuel | ||
| Battery Voltage | 48 V | 48 V |
| Battery Capacity | 700 Ah | 850 Ah |
| Battery Type | Lead-acid | Lead-acid |
| Minimum Battery Weight | 1,119 kg (2,467 lb) | Not specified |
| Dimensions | ||
| Overall Length (with forks) | 2,538 mm (8.3 ft) | Not specified |
| Length to Fork Face | 1,388 mm (54.6 in) | 2,170 mm (7.1 ft) |
| Overall Width | 1,265 mm (49.8 in) | 1,065 mm (41.9 in) |
| Height to Overhead Guard | 2,175 mm (7.1 ft) | 2,235 mm (7.3 ft) |
| Wheelbase | 1,500 mm (59.1 in) | 1,390 mm (54.7 in) |
| Ground Clearance | 85 mm (3.3 in) | 100 mm (3.9 in) |
| Outside Turning Radius | 1,767 mm (69.6 in) | 1,940 mm (76.4 in) |
| Right-Angle Stacking Aisle (incl. load) | 2,857 mm (9.4 ft) | Not specified |
| Right-Angle Stacking Aisle (excl. load) | Not specified | 2,365 mm (7.8 ft) |
| Working Aisle (VDI 4.34), 1000x1200 Crossways | 2,857 mm (9.4 ft) | Not specified |
| Working Aisle (VDI 4.34), 800x1200 Lengthwise | 2,913 mm (9.6 ft) | Not specified |
| Load Distance (x) | 343 mm (13.5 in) | 425 mm (16.7 in) |
| Weights | ||
| Operating Weight | 3,801 kg (8,380 lb) | Not specified |
| Front Axle Load (laden) | 1,971 kg (4,345 lb) | Not specified |
| Rear Axle Load (laden) | 3,829 kg (8,442 lb) | Not specified |
| Performance | ||
| Travel Speed (laden) | 11.0 km/h (6.8 mph) | 19.5 km/h (12.1 mph) |
| Travel Speed (unladen) | 11.0 km/h (6.8 mph) | 19.0 km/h (11.8 mph) |
| Lift Speed (laden) | 370 mm/s (72.8 ft/min) | 520 mm/s (102.4 ft/min) |
| Lift Speed (unladen) | 640 mm/s (126.0 ft/min) | 660 mm/s (129.9 ft/min) |
| Lowering Speed (laden) | 550 mm/s (108.3 ft/min) | 500 mm/s (98.4 ft/min) |
| Gradeability (laden) | 12.0% | 21.0% |
| Tyres, Brakes & Chassis | ||
| Tyre Type | Vulkollan | Cushion |
| Front Tyre Size | 343 x 140 | 21 x 7 x 15 |
| Rear Tyre Size | 285 x 100 | 16 x 5 x 10.5 |
| Wheels (front / rear) | 1x / 2 | 2x / 2 |
| Service Brake | Electric | Hydraulic |
| Operator Position | Seated | Seated |
| General | ||
| Noise Level at Operator Ear | 70 dB(A) | Not specified |
| Warranty | 24 months / 4,000 hours (manufacturer standard) | Not specified |
What the numbers say
This is a cross-brand comparison: Hyster R2.0 (R Series (D435)), Toyota 8FBCH25U (Core Electric 8FBC).
Hyster R2.0: 2,000 kg (at 600 mm load centre); Toyota 8FBCH25U: 2,270 kg (at 600 mm load centre). These are published ratings at the same load centre. Check the manufacturer's load chart for the exact mast, lift height and attachment configuration before selecting a truck.
The Toyota 8FBCH25U has the highest published rating at 2,270 kg, 14% more than the Hyster R2.0 at 2,000 kg.
For racking, the Hyster R2.0 reaches 4,650 mm while the Toyota 8FBCH25U tops out at 3,340 mm, a difference of 1,310 mm.
Frequently asked questions
How do the published lift capacity ratings of the Hyster R2.0 and Toyota 8FBCH25U compare?
Hyster R2.0: 2,000 kg (at 600 mm load centre). Toyota 8FBCH25U: 2,270 kg (at 600 mm load centre). These are published ratings at the same load centre. Check the manufacturer's load chart for the exact mast, lift height and attachment configuration before selecting a truck.
How do the lift heights of the Hyster R2.0 and Toyota 8FBCH25U compare?
Hyster R2.0: 4,650 mm. Toyota 8FBCH25U: 3,340 mm.
How do the turning radii of the Hyster R2.0 and Toyota 8FBCH25U compare?
Hyster R2.0: 1,767 mm. Toyota 8FBCH25U: 1,940 mm.
What is the main difference between the Hyster R2.0 and Toyota 8FBCH25U?
The Hyster R2.0 offers 1,310 mm more maximum lift height than the Toyota 8FBCH25U. The Toyota 8FBCH25U offers 200 mm less overall width than the Hyster R2.0. The Toyota 8FBCH25U offers 270 kg more rated lift capacity than the Hyster R2.0. Hyster R2.0: 2,000 kg (at 600 mm load centre) · Toyota 8FBCH25U: 2,270 kg (at 600 mm load centre). These are published ratings at the same load centre. Check the manufacturer's load chart for the exact mast, lift height and attachment configuration before selecting a truck.