Hyster H2.5FT vs Toyota 8FBC30U
Key differences
- Engine / Motor Power. The Hyster H2.5FT offers 15.9 kW more engine / motor power than the Toyota 8FBC30U.
- Outside Turning Radius. The Toyota 8FBC30U offers 256 mm less outside turning radius than the Hyster H2.5FT.
- Ground Clearance. The Hyster H2.5FT offers 60 mm more ground clearance than the Toyota 8FBC30U.
- Lift Speed (laden). The Hyster H2.5FT offers 157 mm/s more lift speed (laden) than the Toyota 8FBC30U.
- Rated Lift Capacity. Hyster H2.5FT: 2,500 kg (at 500 mm load centre) · Toyota 8FBC30U: 2,720 kg (at 600 mm load centre). Load centres differ or are not specified; these capacity ratings are not directly comparable and do not establish a capacity winner. Check the manufacturer's load chart for the exact mast, lift height and attachment configuration before selecting a truck.
- Gradeability (laden). The Hyster H2.5FT offers 4.0% more gradeability (laden) than the Toyota 8FBC30U.
Hyster H2.5FT: 2,500 kg (at 500 mm load centre) · Toyota 8FBC30U: 2,720 kg (at 600 mm load centre). Load centres differ or are not specified; these capacity ratings are not directly comparable and do not establish a capacity winner. Check the manufacturer's load chart for the exact mast, lift height and attachment configuration before selecting a truck.
Toyota 8FBC30U leads with the higher figure on maximum lift height: its published 3,345 mm compares with 3,250 mm for Hyster H2.5FT. That is an absolute difference of 95 mm (2.9% against the latter figure).
The travel speed (laden) figures separate Toyota 8FBC30U and Hyster H2.5FT. Toyota 8FBC30U leads with the higher figure with 19.2 km/h; Hyster H2.5FT records 16.9 km/h, a gap of 2.3 km/h or 13.6% of that second value.
On lift speed (laden), Hyster H2.5FT leads with the higher figure at 610 mm/s versus 453 mm/s for Toyota 8FBC30U. The measured gap is 157 mm/s, or 34.7% relative to the latter published value.
Toyota 8FBC30U leads with the lower figure on outside turning radius: its published 1,960 mm compares with 2,216 mm for Hyster H2.5FT. That is an absolute difference of 256 mm (11.6% against the latter figure).
The engine / motor power figures separate Hyster H2.5FT and Toyota 8FBC30U. Hyster H2.5FT leads with the higher figure with 33.9 kW; Toyota 8FBC30U records 18.0 kW, a gap of 15.9 kW or 88.3% of that second value.
Highlighted values lead on that specification. An arrow indicates whether a higher or lower figure is preferred.
| Specification | Hyster H2.5FT | Toyota 8FBC30U |
|---|---|---|
| Capacity & Load | ||
| Rated Lift Capacity | 2,500 kg (5,512 lb) (at 500 mm load centre) | 2,720 kg (5,997 lb) (at 600 mm load centre) |
| Load Centre | 500 mm (19.7 in) | 600 mm (23.6 in) |
| Maximum Lift Height | 3,250 mm (10.7 ft) | 3,345 mm (11.0 ft) |
| Free Lift | 140 mm (5.5 in) | 135 mm (5.3 in) |
| Mast & Forks | ||
| Mast Type | 2-stage limited free lift | Wide-view 2-stage (V) |
| Mast Height Lowered | 2,170 mm (7.1 ft) | 2,110 mm (6.9 ft) |
| Mast Height Extended | 3,900 mm (12.8 ft) | 4,565 mm (15.0 ft) |
| Mast Tilt Forward | 6deg | 6deg |
| Mast Tilt Backward | 5deg | 8deg |
| Fork Length | 1,000 mm (39.4 in) | 1,070 mm (42.1 in) |
| Fork Width | 100 mm (3.9 in) | 125 mm (4.9 in) |
| Fork Thickness | 40 mm (1.6 in) | 45 mm (1.8 in) |
| Fork Carriage Class | II A | Not specified |
| Engine & Powertrain | ||
| Fuel Type | Diesel | Electric |
| Power Source | Internal Combustion | Battery Electric |
| Engine Manufacturer | Yanmar | Not specified |
| Engine Model | 4TNE92 (2.6 L) | Not specified |
| Engine / Motor Power | 33.9 kW (45.5 hp) | 18.0 kW (24.1 hp) |
| Engine Displacement | 2,659 cc | Not specified |
| Cylinders | 4 | Not specified |
| Drive Motor Power | Not specified | 18.0 kW (24.1 hp) |
| Lift Motor Power | Not specified | 21.5 kW (28.8 hp) |
| Transmission | Electronic Powershift, 1-speed | AC drive, transistor inverter |
| Battery & Fuel | ||
| Battery Voltage | Not specified | 48 V |
| Battery Capacity | Not specified | 850 Ah |
| Battery Type | Not specified | Lead-acid |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 52.8 L (13.9 gal) | Not specified |
| Dimensions | ||
| Overall Length (with forks) | 3,559 mm (11.7 ft) | Not specified |
| Length to Fork Face | 2,559 mm (8.4 ft) | 2,275 mm (7.5 ft) |
| Overall Width | 1,157 mm (45.6 in) | 1,110 mm (43.7 in) |
| Height to Overhead Guard | 2,160 mm (7.1 ft) | 2,235 mm (7.3 ft) |
| Wheelbase | 1,623 mm (63.9 in) | 1,390 mm (54.7 in) |
| Ground Clearance | 160 mm (6.3 in) | 100 mm (3.9 in) |
| Outside Turning Radius | 2,216 mm (7.3 ft) | 1,960 mm (77.2 in) |
| Right-Angle Stacking Aisle (incl. load) | 3,887 mm (12.8 ft) | Not specified |
| Right-Angle Stacking Aisle (excl. load) | Not specified | 2,410 mm (7.9 ft) |
| Working Aisle (VDI 4.34), 1000x1200 Crossways | 3,887 mm (12.8 ft) | Not specified |
| Working Aisle (VDI 4.34), 800x1200 Lengthwise | 4,087 mm (13.4 ft) | Not specified |
| Load Distance (x) | 471 mm (18.5 in) | 450 mm (17.7 in) |
| Internal Turning Radius (b13) | 629 mm (24.8 in) | Not specified |
| Weights | ||
| Operating Weight | 3,902 kg (8,602 lb) | Not specified |
| Front Axle Load (laden) | 5,778 kg (12,738 lb) | Not specified |
| Rear Axle Load (laden) | 624 kg (1,376 lb) | Not specified |
| Performance | ||
| Travel Speed (laden) | 16.9 km/h (10.5 mph) | 19.2 km/h (11.9 mph) |
| Travel Speed (unladen) | 18.0 km/h (11.2 mph) | 18.5 km/h (11.5 mph) |
| Lift Speed (laden) | 610 mm/s (120.1 ft/min) | 453 mm/s (89.2 ft/min) |
| Lift Speed (unladen) | 710 mm/s (139.8 ft/min) | 595 mm/s (117.1 ft/min) |
| Lowering Speed (laden) | 580 mm/s (114.2 ft/min) | 500 mm/s (98.4 ft/min) |
| Gradeability (laden) | 21.0% | 17.0% |
| Drawbar Pull (laden) | 17,440 N (3,921 lbf) | Not specified |
| Tyres, Brakes & Chassis | ||
| Tyre Type | Solid Pneumatic | Cushion |
| Front Tyre Size | 7.00 x 12-12 | 21 x 8 x 15 |
| Rear Tyre Size | 6.00 x 9 | 16 x 6 x 10.5 |
| Wheels (front / rear) | 2x / 2 | 2x / 2 |
| Service Brake | Hydraulic, drum | Hydraulic |
| Operator Position | Seated | Seated |
| General | ||
| Noise Level at Operator Ear | 79 dB(A) | Not specified |
| Warranty | 24 months / 4,000 hours (manufacturer standard) | Not specified |
What the numbers say
This is a cross-brand comparison: Hyster H2.5FT (Fortens FT), Toyota 8FBC30U (Core Electric 8FBC).
Hyster H2.5FT: 2,500 kg (at 500 mm load centre); Toyota 8FBC30U: 2,720 kg (at 600 mm load centre). Load centres differ or are not specified; these capacity ratings are not directly comparable and do not establish a capacity winner. Check the manufacturer's load chart for the exact mast, lift height and attachment configuration before selecting a truck.
For racking, the Toyota 8FBC30U reaches 3,345 mm while the Hyster H2.5FT tops out at 3,250 mm, a difference of 95 mm.
Frequently asked questions
How do the published lift capacity ratings of the Hyster H2.5FT and Toyota 8FBC30U compare?
Hyster H2.5FT: 2,500 kg (at 500 mm load centre). Toyota 8FBC30U: 2,720 kg (at 600 mm load centre). Load centres differ or are not specified; these capacity ratings are not directly comparable and do not establish a capacity winner. Check the manufacturer's load chart for the exact mast, lift height and attachment configuration before selecting a truck.
How do the lift heights of the Hyster H2.5FT and Toyota 8FBC30U compare?
Hyster H2.5FT: 3,250 mm. Toyota 8FBC30U: 3,345 mm.
How do the turning radii of the Hyster H2.5FT and Toyota 8FBC30U compare?
Hyster H2.5FT: 2,216 mm. Toyota 8FBC30U: 1,960 mm.
What is the main difference between the Hyster H2.5FT and Toyota 8FBC30U?
The Hyster H2.5FT offers 15.9 kW more engine / motor power than the Toyota 8FBC30U. The Toyota 8FBC30U offers 256 mm less outside turning radius than the Hyster H2.5FT. The Hyster H2.5FT offers 60 mm more ground clearance than the Toyota 8FBC30U.
Do the Hyster H2.5FT and Toyota 8FBC30U use the same fuel type?
No. Hyster H2.5FT: Diesel. Toyota 8FBC30U: Electric.